Hans Hagen said:
makes me wonder if we should have
\chr{e"a'}
producing
ëá
(using real combinings is ok already) which is trivial to implement so
for the fun of it i might as well add that
I think that it would be useful. I use Unicode characters extensively in
my ConTeXt input, but only because I edit it in Emacs and can set up
keymaps that map to the Unicode characters in a way that I can actually
remember. I think that this would add an easily remembered way for people
to add combining characters to their documents. Sometimes a slightly more
verbose way to do something is helpful when it is more easily remembered.
(Honestly, I can't remember the hex codes for any Unicode characters after
you get out of the range that maps to plain ASCII
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 5:29 PM Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 2/5/2021 6:19 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> >
> > On 2/5/21 5:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> >> etc ... the ones that make 'composed characters'. I think that anyone
> >> who needs them uses utf . They can be in (say) m-oldschool.mkxl or so.
> >>
> >> Objections? Hurt feelings? Sentiments?
> >
> > No hurt feelings, but I know that in my bib files, there are a couple of
> > old entries that still have these weird composed characters. So I'm fine
> > with upgrading, but it would be nice if this could fail gracefully, with
> > a nice and informative error message...
> btw, something like that will never happen suddenly ... more a matter of
> declaring them obsolete, maybe move them so a module that we could still
> load by default and later maybe on demand
>
> concerning bibtex files, that's another story ... in order to deal well
> with sorting etc quite a bit of sanitizing already takes place there
> (alan and i spent quite a bit of time on that); also there are ways to
> define extra only-used-in-bibtex commands, so we could actually just
> define them for bib stuff only
>
> it's more about "what are the current habits" ... we have commands like
> \" (which is kind of intuitive) but \r and \v and such fall in the
> category, and there are more kind of accents than we currently have
> commands for anyway
>
> a similar discussion (and we already exchanged some mails about that)
> are named glyphs ... we have quite some for latin, greek, cyrillic (like
> \eacute) but how about the rest of unicode
>
> makes me wonder if we should have
>
>\chr{e"a'}
>
> producing
>
>ëá
>
> (using real combinings is ok already) which is trivial to implement so
> for the fun of it i might as well add that; i think most who deal with
> languages that have characters other than ascii will input in the most
> natural way so we're only talking of escapes for those who see accents
> and such as noise (yes we do have accents in dutch)
>
> (in mkii we already had utf so then we actually did much of the
> transition but mkii is stone age in terms of software)
>
> Hans
>
> -
>Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
>Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
> tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
> -
>
> ___
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
> the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
> archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
>
> ___
>
--
T. Kurt Bond, tkurtb...@gmail.com, https://tkurtbond.github.io
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
