Re: [NTG-context] new upload / more math

2022-04-01 Thread Willi Egger via ntg-context
Hi Hans,

congrats for this new society! — At this date it is specially hilarious :-)

Happy CMS!

Willi

> On 1 Apr 2022, at 16:30, jdh via ntg-context  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Wrong.  The imperial measurement system, may give Europeans a headache, but 
> is NOT obsolete, by any means.  A good chunk of the world use the imperial 
> measurment system and may be required in certain books, depending on a 
> country's standards.
> 
> dh
> 
> -
> 
> 
> Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context  wrote:
> 
>> Oh, great work, thank you! (While I keep working with WebCMS and avoid
>> math...)
>> 
>> And I guess you forgot to mention that you discontinued the support
>> for non-metric measures like the obsolete inch, except Potrzebie, of
>> course.
>> 
>> Hraban
>> 
>> Am 01.04.22 um 10:02 schrieb Hans Hagen via ntg-context:
>>> Hi,
>>> As most of you know by now, Mikael and I are working on a math
>>> support upgrade. In order to let users keep up we uploaded a new
>>> version. We have been revisioning some of the more obscure
>>> constructs where we have   no clue of usage, like pmod, bmod,
>>> bordermatrix etc, commands that we   took (and reimplemented)
>>> decades ago from plain TeX or AMS TeX, assuming that these are
>>> standards.
>>> In this release, encouraged by the positive response we received
>>> from users regarding the new simplealignment construction, and in
>>> particular regarding the self-explaining sesac, we have decided to
>>> introduced some new constructs. First out is
>>> \startformula
>>> \startxıɹʇɐɯ
>>> \NC a_1 \NC b_1 \NC c_1 \NR
>>> \NC a_2 \NC b_2 \NC c_2 \NR
>>> \NC a_3 \NC b_3 \NC c_3 \NR
>>> \stopxıɹʇɐɯ
>>> \stopformula
>>> for rotation matrices. This was demanded for some advanced math
>>> courses that Mikael teaches. It might inspire users to come up with
>>> demands that suits their own obscure but nevertheless interesting
>>> math.
>>> At some point we realized that, with (also) scientific publishers
>>> (of math journals) moving to MS Word and Indesign, we operate in a
>>> rather peculiar niche and the fact that we use an upgraded and more
>>> granular math engine, made us wonder how to communicate all these
>>> new features and standards that we set. It is for that reason that
>>> from now on we will operate under the CMS umbrella. That
>>> abbreviation stands for ConTeXt Math Society. It has no funny swirly
>>> TeX logo which itself is a statement: in Unicode math script and
>>> calligraphic alphabets are so messed up that it is impossible to
>>> have a reliable and predictable rendering. We go for Dutch and
>>> Swedish simplicity in the spirit of W.N. Lansburgh: back to the
>>> times before TeX was written (1964). There will be no limits and
>>> boundaries set. (Talking math limits and boundaries: these can
>>> already go everywhere anyway, as can fences.)
>>> So, when we mention CMS, we mean serious math business, but
>>> kindergarten math is also embraced! There are no consequences for
>>> users: ConTeXt users with a proven math track record are
>>> automatically a member, but we are not too picky, everyone is
>>> welcome. We don't have honorary members but Taco (the first ConTeXt
>>> math user) and Aditya (the most experienced   one) might consider
>>> themselves as such. Mikael Sundqvist is the chairman, which is a
>>> livelong appointment. (A nice side effect is that with Arthur living
>>> in Sweden too, that gives us a very strong position in the TeX
>>> landscape there.)
>>> So, today's upload is sort of special: welcome CMS (ConTeXt Math 
>>> Shines), goodbye AMS (American Math Second). Of course we're open
>>> for suggestions and it being an open society all voices will be
>>> heard, but only proper (retro) math cf Lansburgh will be honored. Of
>>> course we only listen to ConTeXt users and, as that package is not
>>> supposed to be used for serious math, we don't bother about the few
>>> publishers left that still do math.
>>> Are we done? Not yet. We're in the middle of (colorful and graphic) 
>>> alignment ornaments and after that we're going to expand and improve
>>> multi-line display formulas and equation numbering.
>>> It will be no coincidence that the cover of Landburghs book about
>>> math typesetting has a prominent 'AWE' embedded in a logo with a
>>> lion on top: we hope all users are in awe about what the TeX lion
>>> can do.
>>> Mikael S & Hans H
>>> 
>> ___
>> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to 
>> the Wiki!
>> 
>> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / 
>> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
>> archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
>> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
>> ___
> ___

Re: [NTG-context] mkiv

2022-04-01 Thread Denis Maier via ntg-context
Same here... I haven't managed to run mkiv for months. Not a huge deal, but 
anyway.

Best,
Denis

Von: ntg-context  im Auftrag von Pablo Rodriguez 
via ntg-context 
Gesendet: Freitag, 1. April 2022 20:37:30
An: Hans Hagen via ntg-context
Cc: Pablo Rodriguez
Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] mkiv

On 4/1/22 18:20, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
> [...]
> So, today is the day we kind of formally freeze MKIV.

Just a comment on MkIV.

I don’t remember exactly, but I’m afraid that "context --luatex
document" hasn’t been working on my computers (either running Linux or
Windows) for months now.

This isn’t important for me, but just in case it may be relevant for you.

If I run "context --luatex document", I get a new directory
'$HOME/.texlive2021/texmf-var' created (which includes a "luatex-cache"
directory inside)

When I run "mtxrun --generate", all required files are generated in
"$HOME/context/tex/texmf-cache/luametatex-cache".

I wonder why "mtrun --generate" doesn’t generate a "luatex-cache"
directory in the same directory containing "luametatex-cache".

BTW, the '$HOME/.texlive2021/texmf-var/luatex-cache/" directory only
contains an empty 'context/d10b607aa0e9d13dde6602f491b76cbc/trees/' path.

Just in case it may be relevant and many thanks for ConTeXt,

Pablo
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] mkiv

2022-04-01 Thread Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context
On 4/1/22 18:20, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
> [...]
> So, today is the day we kind of formally freeze MKIV.

Just a comment on MkIV.

I don’t remember exactly, but I’m afraid that "context --luatex
document" hasn’t been working on my computers (either running Linux or
Windows) for months now.

This isn’t important for me, but just in case it may be relevant for you.

If I run "context --luatex document", I get a new directory
'$HOME/.texlive2021/texmf-var' created (which includes a "luatex-cache"
directory inside)

When I run "mtxrun --generate", all required files are generated in
"$HOME/context/tex/texmf-cache/luametatex-cache".

I wonder why "mtrun --generate" doesn’t generate a "luatex-cache"
directory in the same directory containing "luametatex-cache".

BTW, the '$HOME/.texlive2021/texmf-var/luatex-cache/" directory only
contains an empty 'context/d10b607aa0e9d13dde6602f491b76cbc/trees/' path.

Just in case it may be relevant and many thanks for ConTeXt,

Pablo
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] mkiv

2022-04-01 Thread Rik Kabel via ntg-context


On 2022-04-01 12:20, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:

Hi,

Normally when we're in the 2022 TeXlive code freeze period, there is a 
snapshot release but because there hasn't been that many changes, 
maybe a few patches, in MKIV there is no real snapshot this year. But 
for the sake of consistency we can consider today's version that 
snapshot.


It basically means that MKIV has been frozen and is even more frozen 
now. All new stuff goes in MKXL (aka LMTX) and I suppose that next 
year we let that end up in TeXlive alongside frozen MKII and MKIV. Of 
course bugs will be fixed as usual.


So, today is the day we kind of formally freeze MKIV.

Hans


With the freeze of MKIV, how will modules be managed? LMTX still ships 
without. A while back 
(https://www.mail-archive.com/ntg-context@ntg.nl/msg100179.html) it was 
suggest that this would, at some point, change.


--
Rik

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


[NTG-context] mkiv

2022-04-01 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context

Hi,

Normally when we're in the 2022 TeXlive code freeze period, there is a 
snapshot release but because there hasn't been that many changes, maybe 
a few patches, in MKIV there is no real snapshot this year. But for the 
sake of consistency we can consider today's version that snapshot.


It basically means that MKIV has been frozen and is even more frozen 
now. All new stuff goes in MKXL (aka LMTX) and I suppose that next year 
we let that end up in TeXlive alongside frozen MKII and MKIV. Of course 
bugs will be fixed as usual.


So, today is the day we kind of formally freeze MKIV.

Hans


-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
   tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] new upload / more math

2022-04-01 Thread jdh via ntg-context


Wrong.  The imperial measurement system, may give Europeans a headache, but is 
NOT obsolete, by any means.  A good chunk of the world use the imperial 
measurment system and may be required in certain books, depending on a 
country's standards.

dh

-


Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context  wrote:

> Oh, great work, thank you! (While I keep working with WebCMS and avoid
> math...)
> 
> And I guess you forgot to mention that you discontinued the support
> for non-metric measures like the obsolete inch, except Potrzebie, of
> course.
> 
> Hraban
> 
> Am 01.04.22 um 10:02 schrieb Hans Hagen via ntg-context:
> > Hi,
> > As most of you know by now, Mikael and I are working on a math
> > support upgrade. In order to let users keep up we uploaded a new
> > version. We have been revisioning some of the more obscure
> > constructs where we have   no clue of usage, like pmod, bmod,
> > bordermatrix etc, commands that we   took (and reimplemented)
> > decades ago from plain TeX or AMS TeX, assuming that these are
> > standards.
> > In this release, encouraged by the positive response we received
> > from users regarding the new simplealignment construction, and in
> > particular regarding the self-explaining sesac, we have decided to
> > introduced some new constructs. First out is
> > \startformula
> > \startxıɹʇɐɯ
> >    \NC a_1 \NC b_1 \NC c_1 \NR
> >    \NC a_2 \NC b_2 \NC c_2 \NR
> >    \NC a_3 \NC b_3 \NC c_3 \NR
> > \stopxıɹʇɐɯ
> > \stopformula
> > for rotation matrices. This was demanded for some advanced math
> > courses that Mikael teaches. It might inspire users to come up with
> > demands that suits their own obscure but nevertheless interesting
> > math.
> > At some point we realized that, with (also) scientific publishers
> > (of math journals) moving to MS Word and Indesign, we operate in a
> > rather peculiar niche and the fact that we use an upgraded and more
> > granular math engine, made us wonder how to communicate all these
> > new features and standards that we set. It is for that reason that
> > from now on we will operate under the CMS umbrella. That
> > abbreviation stands for ConTeXt Math Society. It has no funny swirly
> > TeX logo which itself is a statement: in Unicode math script and
> > calligraphic alphabets are so messed up that it is impossible to
> > have a reliable and predictable rendering. We go for Dutch and
> > Swedish simplicity in the spirit of W.N. Lansburgh: back to the
> > times before TeX was written (1964). There will be no limits and
> > boundaries set. (Talking math limits and boundaries: these can
> > already go everywhere anyway, as can fences.)
> > So, when we mention CMS, we mean serious math business, but
> > kindergarten math is also embraced! There are no consequences for
> > users: ConTeXt users with a proven math track record are
> > automatically a member, but we are not too picky, everyone is
> > welcome. We don't have honorary members but Taco (the first ConTeXt
> > math user) and Aditya (the most experienced   one) might consider
> > themselves as such. Mikael Sundqvist is the chairman, which is a
> > livelong appointment. (A nice side effect is that with Arthur living
> > in Sweden too, that gives us a very strong position in the TeX
> > landscape there.)
> > So, today's upload is sort of special: welcome CMS (ConTeXt Math 
> > Shines), goodbye AMS (American Math Second). Of course we're open
> > for suggestions and it being an open society all voices will be
> > heard, but only proper (retro) math cf Lansburgh will be honored. Of
> > course we only listen to ConTeXt users and, as that package is not
> > supposed to be used for serious math, we don't bother about the few
> > publishers left that still do math.
> > Are we done? Not yet. We're in the middle of (colorful and graphic) 
> > alignment ornaments and after that we're going to expand and improve
> > multi-line display formulas and equation numbering.
> > It will be no coincidence that the cover of Landburghs book about
> > math typesetting has a prominent 'AWE' embedded in a logo with a
> > lion on top: we hope all users are in awe about what the TeX lion
> > can do.
> > Mikael S & Hans H
> > 
> ___
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
> Wiki!
> 
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
> archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
> ___
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / 

Re: [NTG-context] new upload / more math

2022-04-01 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context
Oh, great work, thank you! (While I keep working with WebCMS and avoid 
math...)


And I guess you forgot to mention that you discontinued the support for 
non-metric measures like the obsolete inch, except Potrzebie, of course.


Hraban

Am 01.04.22 um 10:02 schrieb Hans Hagen via ntg-context:

Hi,

As most of you know by now, Mikael and I are working on a math support 
upgrade. In order to let users keep up we uploaded a new version. We 
have been revisioning some of the more obscure constructs where we have 
  no clue of usage, like pmod, bmod, bordermatrix etc, commands that we 
  took (and reimplemented) decades ago from plain TeX or AMS TeX, 
assuming that these are standards.


In this release, encouraged by the positive response we received from 
users regarding the new simplealignment construction, and in particular 
regarding the self-explaining sesac, we have decided to introduced some 
new constructs. First out is


\startformula
\startxıɹʇɐɯ
   \NC a_1 \NC b_1 \NC c_1 \NR
   \NC a_2 \NC b_2 \NC c_2 \NR
   \NC a_3 \NC b_3 \NC c_3 \NR
\stopxıɹʇɐɯ
\stopformula

for rotation matrices. This was demanded for some advanced math courses 
that Mikael teaches. It might inspire users to come up with demands that 
suits their own obscure but nevertheless interesting math.


At some point we realized that, with (also) scientific publishers (of 
math journals) moving to MS Word and Indesign, we operate in a rather 
peculiar niche and the fact that we use an upgraded and more granular 
math engine, made us wonder how to communicate all these new features 
and standards that we set. It is for that reason that from now on we 
will operate under the CMS umbrella. That abbreviation stands for 
ConTeXt Math Society. It has no funny swirly TeX logo which itself is a 
statement: in Unicode math script and calligraphic alphabets are so 
messed up that it is impossible to have a reliable and predictable 
rendering. We go for Dutch and Swedish simplicity in the spirit of W.N. 
Lansburgh: back to the times before TeX was written (1964). There will 
be no limits and boundaries set. (Talking math limits and boundaries: 
these can already go everywhere anyway, as can fences.)


So, when we mention CMS, we mean serious math business, but kindergarten 
math is also embraced! There are no consequences for users: ConTeXt 
users with a proven math track record are automatically a member, but we 
are not too picky, everyone is welcome. We don't have honorary members 
but Taco (the first ConTeXt math user) and Aditya (the most experienced 
  one) might consider themselves as such. Mikael Sundqvist is the 
chairman, which is a livelong appointment. (A nice side effect is that 
with Arthur living in Sweden too, that gives us a very strong position 
in the TeX landscape there.)


So, today's upload is sort of special: welcome CMS (ConTeXt Math 
Shines), goodbye AMS (American Math Second). Of course we're open for 
suggestions and it being an open society all voices will be heard, but 
only proper (retro) math cf Lansburgh will be honored. Of course we only 
listen to ConTeXt users and, as that package is not supposed to be used 
for serious math, we don't bother about the few publishers left that 
still do math.


Are we done? Not yet. We're in the middle of (colorful and graphic) 
alignment ornaments and after that we're going to expand and improve 
multi-line display formulas and equation numbering.


It will be no coincidence that the cover of Landburghs book about math 
typesetting has a prominent 'AWE' embedded in a logo with a lion on top: 
we hope all users are in awe about what the TeX lion can do.


Mikael S & Hans H


___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


[NTG-context] new upload / more math

2022-04-01 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context

Hi,

As most of you know by now, Mikael and I are working on a math support 
upgrade. In order to let users keep up we uploaded a new version. We 
have been revisioning some of the more obscure constructs where we have 
 no clue of usage, like pmod, bmod, bordermatrix etc, commands that we 
 took (and reimplemented) decades ago from plain TeX or AMS TeX, 
assuming that these are standards.


In this release, encouraged by the positive response we received from 
users regarding the new simplealignment construction, and in particular 
regarding the self-explaining sesac, we have decided to introduced some 
new constructs. First out is


\startformula
\startxıɹʇɐɯ
  \NC a_1 \NC b_1 \NC c_1 \NR
  \NC a_2 \NC b_2 \NC c_2 \NR
  \NC a_3 \NC b_3 \NC c_3 \NR
\stopxıɹʇɐɯ
\stopformula

for rotation matrices. This was demanded for some advanced math courses 
that Mikael teaches. It might inspire users to come up with demands that 
suits their own obscure but nevertheless interesting math.


At some point we realized that, with (also) scientific publishers (of 
math journals) moving to MS Word and Indesign, we operate in a rather 
peculiar niche and the fact that we use an upgraded and more granular 
math engine, made us wonder how to communicate all these new features 
and standards that we set. It is for that reason that from now on we 
will operate under the CMS umbrella. That abbreviation stands for 
ConTeXt Math Society. It has no funny swirly TeX logo which itself is a 
statement: in Unicode math script and calligraphic alphabets are so 
messed up that it is impossible to have a reliable and predictable 
rendering. We go for Dutch and Swedish simplicity in the spirit of W.N. 
Lansburgh: back to the times before TeX was written (1964). There will 
be no limits and boundaries set. (Talking math limits and boundaries: 
these can already go everywhere anyway, as can fences.)


So, when we mention CMS, we mean serious math business, but kindergarten 
math is also embraced! There are no consequences for users: ConTeXt 
users with a proven math track record are automatically a member, but we 
are not too picky, everyone is welcome. We don't have honorary members 
but Taco (the first ConTeXt math user) and Aditya (the most experienced 
 one) might consider themselves as such. Mikael Sundqvist is the 
chairman, which is a livelong appointment. (A nice side effect is that 
with Arthur living in Sweden too, that gives us a very strong position 
in the TeX landscape there.)


So, today's upload is sort of special: welcome CMS (ConTeXt Math 
Shines), goodbye AMS (American Math Second). Of course we're open for 
suggestions and it being an open society all voices will be heard, but 
only proper (retro) math cf Lansburgh will be honored. Of course we only 
listen to ConTeXt users and, as that package is not supposed to be used 
for serious math, we don't bother about the few publishers left that 
still do math.


Are we done? Not yet. We're in the middle of (colorful and graphic) 
alignment ornaments and after that we're going to expand and improve 
multi-line display formulas and equation numbering.


It will be no coincidence that the cover of Landburghs book about math 
typesetting has a prominent 'AWE' embedded in a logo with a lion on top: 
we hope all users are in awe about what the TeX lion can do.


Mikael S & Hans H

-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
   tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___