Re: [NTG-context] presentation (simple-slides?) master-like feature?

2009-10-29 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: Bruce, very briefly: I'm very very short on time this week, so won't be able to look into this until middle of next week, but I just wanted to let you know that I find your

Re: [NTG-context] Seeking a Deeper ConTeXt: Questions f or Initializing

2009-05-26 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
Hans Hagen pragma at wxs.nl writes: ... in which case it keeps the input in xml and converts to other formats (coule be tex in the case of rendering print). As Hans says, if you're interesting in integrating XML and RDF in source documents, you need to think of ConTeXt as a lower-level

Re: [NTG-context] Seeking a Deeper ConTeXt: Questions for Initializing

2009-05-26 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
John Haltiwanger john.haltiwanger at gmail.com writes: [...] Markdown with RDFa on the side will suit quite nicely, thanks to pandoc. Actually, you can embed the RDFa within the markdown files if you like. div property=x:section # Introduction Test. /div Pandoc will just pass it on to

Re: [NTG-context] bibmodule (again)

2009-05-14 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
Taco Hoekwater taco at elvenkind.com writes: The new structure and referencing code is totally different from the old code and I understand less than half of it. What's worse: I seem to be really bad at explaining to Hans all the things that should happen wrt. references in the bib module.

Re: [NTG-context] New bib module

2009-04-01 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
Taco Hoekwater taco at elvenkind.com writes: Bruce D'Arcus wrote: Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfgang at googlemail.com writes: Am 31.03.2009 um 09:27 schrieb Taco Hoekwater: Will this new module also provide BibX support? Perhaps ;) On the input side, the new module will load

Re: [NTG-context] New bib module

2009-03-31 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfgang at googlemail.com writes: Am 31.03.2009 um 09:27 schrieb Taco Hoekwater: Will this new module also provide BibX support? Perhaps ;) On the input side, the new module will load bibliographies from disk into an internal XML structure and then use

Re: [NTG-context] typescript repository

2009-03-24 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfgang at googlemail.com writes: Am 23.03.2009 um 22:51 schrieb Mohamed Bana: I personally would like see a professionally done typescript for Minion and Warnock Pro with Myriad and Cronos Pro. I posted mine a while ago, but I got no feed back.

Re: [NTG-context] Bibliographic Databases

2008-04-20 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
Taco Hoekwater taco at elvenkind.com writes: Hi, Andreas Wagner wrote: Just out of curiosity: What are your reasons for preferring this over TEI: MODS was a logical choice mostly my background (scientific publishers = MARC databases = MODS), and that BruceD'Arcus liked it. Btw, his

Re: [NTG-context] bib amd mods

2006-06-20 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
Hi Hans, Hans Hagen pragma at wxs.nl writes: I wonder, is there any interest in the following: - support for http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/ as basic bibl format I think Ulf's conclusions are right. MODS is expressive, which is why I was originally attracted to it, but it's also more

Re: [NTG-context] crossref in bibtex

2006-03-23 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
Taco Hoekwater taco at elvenkind.com writes: [.. snip ...] The next major release of the module (but don't expect a release anywhere this year) will indeed support MODS through citeproc: http://xbiblio.sourceforge.net/citeproc/ As the author of citeproc (hi Taco!), let me just update

[NTG-context] Re: mag-0008

2004-12-16 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
On Dec 15, 2004, at 12:16 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: that was from the time that i played with schema's, nowadays i prefer relax ng Indeed! It may be worth noting that the next generation versions of both DocBook and TEI: - are developed in RELAX NG - are namespaced - are designed for

[NTG-context] Re: mag-0008 (was: XML formulas)

2004-12-13 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
On Dec 13, 2004, at 1:02 PM, Adam Lindsay wrote: What I propose is clearly a debatable XML-design issue, but it seemed strange that fx:definelayout and fx:p were put into the same namespace. Why do the formatting definitions share the same (theoretical) schema as markup? Your documents keep these

[NTG-context] Re: ConTeXt Switcher?

2003-12-14 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
someone (not sure who) said: I know XML source should work, but at least for me, creating XML source is unproductive. I work with a text editor and find writing this: ``Hello world,'' says HAL. much more productive than writing this: p#8220;Hello world#8221;/p, says HAL. Maybe I'm