Is there also a way how to achieve this in MkII ? (other than by hand)
Cheers
Carsten
Am 04.06.2009 um 16:34 schrieb richard.steph...@converteam.com:
Am 04.06.2009 um 14:56 schrieb richard.steph...@converteam.com:
I need all section heads to be in full-size capitals, so I tried:
On 18.02.2009 at 16:45 wrote Michael Bynum:
Yes, I think this will suit my needs. Thank you. I have one
additional question though. In the command
\definesynonyms[nomenclature][nomenclatures][\infull]
What does the [nomenclatures] field do? Looking at the manual it
seems to be the
Dear Mike
if something simple is what you had in mind for this, you might want
to try this:
\definesynonyms[nomenclature][nomenclatures][\infull]
\setupsynonyms[nomenclature] %[criterium=all]
\starttext
\completelistofnomenclatures
\section{Some section}
% these could be placed anywhere
Dear Peter and Wolfgang,
sorry for taking a bit longer to come back to you and your suggestions
here.
But I got some strange results and did some further testing and trying
on all this.
What got me a bit, was/is that your suggestion below works as is, but
fails with only slightly more
Dear ConTeXt experts,
I have setup a page layout where I use table in the page-head for
formatting quite a bit of stuff. (The example below is just a simple
as can be basic idea, to show the overall effect)
Now - as I can't prevent later users of this layout environment - to
not use
sorted out again in either case and everything
looks more or less as it should (i.e. like in the single-page table)
Am 20.01.2008 um 14:10 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:37:13 +0100
Carsten Fechtmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear ConTeXt experts,
I have setup a page
Dear Wolfgang,
first, I _really_ appreciate your effort. Unfortunately, for me
\framed is not likely to do the job, as the header is a bit more
complicated in real-life (I told you so ;-).
And yes, actually, using framed had been my very first approach as the
original LaTeX layout had been
Dear Peter,
please be aware that I am still a ConTeXt newbie, therefore, I am not
sure if this is really the way things should be done, only that it
seems to work with up to a 999 figures (tested) and probably more ;-)
Nonetheless, the following code probably does the trick you were
Hello everyone,
first off: I am new to ConTeXt (even if not so new to LaTeX)
and would like to transfer some of my old macros to ConTeXt...
I am well aware, that this means re-programming (most) of them.
So be it.
Furthermore, I am not sure if this is really the right way (read
ConTeXt Way)
Hi Aditya,
thanks for taking the time to answer this. And yes, I looked at what
ConTeXt has already built in.
On 12.01.2008 at 18:44 wrote Aditya Mahajan:
I haven't looked at your code below. First check if one the in-built
stuctural environments of ConTeXt do what you want.
As a matter
was actually fine. Now, without it (i.e. ~) it works!
...
{\expanded{\Issue[\IssueCounter]{Issue: \IssueCounter:}{\currentdate}}}
...
Thanks a lot, that had me seriously baffled ;-)
Carsten
On 12.01.2008 at 23:29 wrote Aditya Mahajan:
Hi Carsten,
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Carsten Fechtmann wrote
11 matches
Mail list logo
