Re: [NTG-context] newbie questions
Interested in computer typesetting a Bible. Sent from my iPad ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] formatting verse
I've looked on the wiki and in the manuals for an equivalent to
LaTeX's \begin{verse} environment. I found a macro in a file on the
wiki, but the definition of it seems to be obsolete.
What I'm working on is converting a wedding service set using LaTeX
and the booklet package over to ConTeX and its built-in Imposition
features.
-Gary Tucker
Dr. Gary A. Tucker
Associate Professor, Computer Science Mathematics
Averett University
420 West Main St., Danville, VA 24541
434/791-5709
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Re: Tutorial
Patrick Gundlach wrote: I am currently working in a Windows (XP) environment but if it makes a difference and Linux is more suitable for a Tex environment I move to a Unix based one then. Thanks for the reply. No problem, there are several windows users on this list. But I don't know which distribution is currently preferred. MikTeX? I can't speak for any other distribution, but MikTeX is practically mindlessly easy to install and maintain. And it seems to work. http://www.miktex.org/ You should be able to produce ConTeXt documents out of the box when installed properly. Hope this helps, Patrick ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] newbie question about fonts
Ciro A. Soto wrote: Okay, this business of fonts/files/names/encoding/etc is really difficult to understand for me. You and 95% of all users, so don't feel bad. I've given up. I use whatever comes out, which I guess is computer modern. (I can use Postscript Times Roman, but no other Postscript font works for me. Which is ok, since I use a lot of math and math comes out in cm no matter what font you use.) ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] can I upgrade yet?
Hans Hagen wrote: Gary wrote: Hans Hagen wrote: Gary wrote: [...] 3.) Is there some other way besides my traditional method of unzipping cont-tmf.zip file into /localtexmf ? Do I need to rebuild the file system? no, you can unzip, run textools --fixtexmf --force, regenerate the database, and cross your fingers ok, here's what I did: 1. Upgraded MikTeX 2. Unzipped the latest cont-tmf.zip (from pragma-ade.com) into c:\tex\localtexmf 3. ran textools --fixtexmf --force (what does that do?) if needed it moves you rlocal enc/map files to their new locations, not needed if you have no commercial fonts 4. checked c:\tex\localtex\context\config. texexec.ini is newer than texexec.rme, so I left it alone. 5. ran texexec --make en nl (do I need nl? I'm exclusively English. I guess it can't hurt.) 6. noticed that cont-en.efmt was automatically relocated to c:\tex\localtex\miktex\fmt but cont-nl was not. 7. moved cont-nl.efmt to c:\tex\localtex\miktex\fmt 8. renamed them both to *.fmt (per a note in the contextgarden wiki. Is this necessary?) 9. ran texexec --make metafun 10. moved metefun.mem to c:\tex\localtex\miktex\mem 11. ran mktexlsr texexec --make (--all if you want all patterns) is normally enough, apart from moving the fmt and mem files (aren't those put at the right spot by miktex?) Hans Hmm. I normally open a command line window, and execute texexec --make en nl in some random directory. The result appears to be cont-en.efmt in the correct place, and cont-nl.efmt in the current directory. It's possible that I did not look closely enough, and something entirely different happened. I can't see why MikTeX would have any say in the matter of what texexec does. Anyway, thanks for commenting. I wasn't sure I was doing the right thing. -g ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] can I upgrade yet?
Some months ago I stopped upgrading ConTeXt. Here and there I saw references to new file hierarchies, and something about installation scripts ... if I remember correctly. I didn't want to break my system, so I just stopped upgrading, and stopped reading those messages (which I didn't understand, anyway). I'm currently using MikTeX. 1.) Concerning file hierarchy: did something monumental indeed ocurr that I ignored? 2.) If so, is it safe to upgrade? 3.) Is there some other way besides my traditional method of unzipping cont-tmf.zip file into /localtexmf ? Do I need to rebuild the file system? 4.) Have I misinterpreted, and nothing much has changed? Sorry about this. I really want to avoid getting my system into some strange state, and spending hours unraveling the mystery. Done that too many times in my life. -gary ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] can I upgrade yet?
Hans Hagen wrote: Gary wrote: [...] Sorry about this. I really want to avoid getting my system into some strange state, and spending hours unraveling the mystery. Done that too many times in my life. i do my best to avoid problem sfo rusers, but some things are out of my control Hans Understood and appreciated. I am *not* annoyed, and I apologize if I sounded annoyed. Thanks for the upgrade tips. -gary ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] can I upgrade yet?
Hans Hagen wrote: Gary wrote: [...] 3.) Is there some other way besides my traditional method of unzipping cont-tmf.zip file into /localtexmf ? Do I need to rebuild the file system? no, you can unzip, run textools --fixtexmf --force, regenerate the database, and cross your fingers ok, here's what I did: 1. Upgraded MikTeX 2. Unzipped the latest cont-tmf.zip (from pragma-ade.com) into c:\tex\localtexmf 3. ran textools --fixtexmf --force (what does that do?) 4. checked c:\tex\localtex\context\config. texexec.ini is newer than texexec.rme, so I left it alone. 5. ran texexec --make en nl (do I need nl? I'm exclusively English. I guess it can't hurt.) 6. noticed that cont-en.efmt was automatically relocated to c:\tex\localtex\miktex\fmt but cont-nl was not. 7. moved cont-nl.efmt to c:\tex\localtex\miktex\fmt 8. renamed them both to *.fmt (per a note in the contextgarden wiki. Is this necessary?) 9. ran texexec --make metafun 10. moved metefun.mem to c:\tex\localtex\miktex\mem 11. ran mktexlsr So far, everything seems to be fine. Are all of these steps necessary? or advisable? Did I forget anything? Is there an shorter method that I've missed? (not that this is long or difficult) Thanks again, -gary ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Best source of ConTeXt documentation?
I would guess that it boils down to the fact that Hans, despite a staggeringly remarkable likeness in appearance, is not Superman. But I, and others, share your pain.The efforts of Hans and the regulars on this group make up for it in large measure. (BTW, Thank You to all the regulars) and the Wiki and Texshow-web have great potential to help ... if they really catch fire. -gary - Original Message - From: Brooks Moses [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ConTeXt users list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2004 6:23 PM Subject: [NTG-context] Best source of ConTeXt documentation? In my efforts to learn ConTeXt, I'm continually getting stuck by a lack of having complete documentation. For example, consider the \definestartstop command, which I was recently looking at. * In the cont-enp.pdf manual, it's not mentioned. * In the mp-cp-en.pdf manual, there's an example of it, but it's not really very clear what the difference is between what the commands= and before= options do. In addition, there's no indication whether these are all the possible options or not, or whether there's any way to define a start/stop pair that takes an argument. * In the source, I can find the definitions, but for that particular one there seems to be very little commentary, and I also suspect I'd need to be rather familiar with the ConTeXt core before I could understand it -- I certainly can't see where the before= goes in, for instance. And that's about all I know about, other than doing a Google search on the mailing-list archives, which rarely addresses the general stuff. Is this all due to an actual lack of documentation for ConTeXt itself, or is there something large and important that I'm missing? Thanks, - Brooks ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Re: itemize
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Me stupid! Willi, this message made my day. I've been using ConTeXt
for more than a year now, but I was never able to figure out what
setupitemize [.1.] .1. number each meant. So it's the level of
itemization. Thanks, that should make things easier. And many thanks
to Patrick and to you for pointing out the left= option. ConTeXt and
the number of options it gives never cease to amaze me!
since we're back on the topic of itemize, I'll repost a question that
I've posted here before:
-
It seems to me that the 'before' and 'after' keywords used in the third
argument of \setupitemize are operative only if 'columns' are also
specified. In the example below, the hairlines disappear if the 'columns'
keyword is eliminated.
Feature, bug, or misunderstanding?
BTW: can the lengths of the two hairlines in this example be made to be
the same length? What's causing the indentation of the first hairline?
Regards,
Gary
-
\setupitemize[2][a,packed,columns][before={\hairline},after={\hairline}]
\setupitemize[1][n]
\starttext
\startitemize
%
\item Level One
%
\startitemize
\item first
\item second
\item third
\stopitemize
%
\item Level two
%
\startitemize
\item here's one
\item here's another
\item finally this
\stopitemize
%
\stopitemize
%
\stoptext
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: Re[6]: [NTG-context] Known nath bugs?
The latest nath (submitted to CTAN, you can retrieve it from there) works correctly on my MiKTeX installation, both inline and displayed obey the structure. Please try updating nath. If it still doesn't work: do you have the same ConTeXt version on the two system? -- Giuseppe Oblomov Bilotta Thank you very much, yes, the new version does work. Giuseppe, please note: I waited a few days to make sure CTAN was up to date. When I first looked for the file, there were different versions on different mirrors. One was dated 2003.12.07, the other 2003.12.08.The version that I downloaded today, and works properly, is dated 2003.12.08. Typo? -gary ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: Re[4]: [NTG-context] Known nath bugs?
Hi,
Nath is a very complex module, easily broken. If you can
privately send me your preamble we might be able to find what
was breaking it. Or you can try it yourself: move it up line by
line until delimiters don't work anymore: you'll find what
makes it bomb :)
OK, I'll try that. At the moment I'm having all kinds of issues with
Let me point out, mainly for the record, that ConTeXt / nath does not seem
to work properly under MikTeX.
The following script works fine with Linux / teTeX, but with MikTeX, the
in-line versions of the math is wrong.
-gary
--
\usemodule[nath]
\starttext
$ y = (1 + \frac{}{a}{b}) $
$ y = (1 + \frac{a}{b}) $
$ y = (1 + a\frac{b}{c}{d})$
$$ y = (1 + \frac{}{a}{b}) $$
$$ y = (1 + \frac{a}{b}) $$
$$ y = (1 + a\frac{b}{c}{d})$$
\stoptext
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Generalized \installcompoundcharacter
Aha. Now I get it. I withdraw my comment, and wait for more expert opinion. -Gary - Original Message - From: Matija Pretnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maybe I gave a bad example. Try this one. http://www.pretnar.info/compare.pdf On 15. apr 2004, at 16:38, Gary Pajer wrote: With the advent of UTF-8, there comes a great possibility to improve readability of the TeX code. For example: instead of \int_a^b, you could write S_a^b, where S is the character for integral. IMHO, this is less readable. ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] yet another question about itemize
I'll take this chance to point out a long-standing problem/misunderstanding
that's causing me some grief:
It seems to me that the 'before' and 'after' keywords used in the third
argument of \setupitemize are operative only if 'columns' are also
specified. In the example below, the hairlines disappear if the 'columns'
keyword is eliminated. [columns, one] almost does it, but the indentation
is
not as expected.
Feature, bug, or misunderstanding?
BTW: can the lengths of the two hairlines in this example be made to be
the same length? What's causing the indentation of the first hairline?
Regards,
Gary
\setupitemize[2][a,packed,columns][before={\hairline},after={\hairline}]
\setupitemize[1][n]
\starttext
\startitemize
%
\item Level One
%
\startitemize
\item first
\item second
\item third
\stopitemize
%
\item Forgot a level
%
\startitemize
\item one
\item two
\item three
\stopitemize
%
\item Level two
%
\startitemize
\item here's one
\item here's another
\item finally this
\stopitemize
%
\stopitemize
%
\stoptext
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] t-nath difficulty
Furthermore: in
\usemodule[nath]
\starttext
$ y = (1 + \frac{}{a}{b}) $
$ y = (1 + \frac{a}{b}) $
$ y = (1 + a\frac{b}{c}{d})$
$$ y = (1 + \frac{}{a}{b}) $$
$$ y = (1 + \frac{a}{b}) $$
$$ y = (1 + a\frac{b}{c}{d})$$
\stoptext
The displayed equation is correct, but the inline isn't.I'm probing this
in my spare time.
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] t-nath difficulty
- Original Message -
From: William D. Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Gary Pajer wrote:
In the following code, the first formula typesets as I want, and the
second doesn't. But the syntax in the second looks correct.
Bug or feature? or setup problem?
\usemodule[nath]
\starttext
$ y = (1 + \frac{}{a}{b}) $
$ y = (1 + \frac{a}{b}) $
\stoptext
What problem are you having? I tried this example and got the following
output (only typset nicely, of course):
y = (1 + (/a)b)
y = (1 + a/b)
Which appears to be the correct output. Are you using the current
t-nath/t-amsl (from december 2003, I believe)?
I have the dec 03 t-nath and version 2003.12.10 ConTeXt.
for the first line I get
y=(1 + a/b)
what I get for the second line is hard to type, but it's what you would
expect from
$y = (1 + a\frac{b}{)} $
so it's as if it's screwing up the arguments: looking for three of them,
putting the first in front of the fraction, the second in the numerator and
the third in the denom. I've tried several different examples. They all
behave exactly as if the arguments are munged in this way.
I must be doing something wrong. But I cut and pasted the code from the
e-mail I sent out and processed it, and I got the error I describe.
If I run it through LaTeX, I get what you describe (and what one would
expect).
It's odd that we get different results. FWIW I'm on WinXP using MikTeX but
with a ConTeXt from pragma-ade installed in localtexmf.
Oh ... I get the same wrong result on Mac OSX/teTeX/brand new ConTeXt.
I must be doing something wrong. Clues?
-gary
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] bfmath in nath
- Original Message - From: David Munger [EMAIL PROTECTED] bold omegas, so the problem has to be in t-nath.tex. Btw, this nath module is very useful to me. If I'd be able to do some debugging into it, I sure would. Could you please point me to some ConTeXt hacking references? Ditto. I'd be willing to do some debugging as well... maybe some of us could informally try to smooth it out. -gary ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] t-nath difficulty
I'm taking a look at nath (via t-nath). Here's the very first thing I
tried:
In the following code, the first formula typesets as I want, and the
second doesn't. But the syntax in the second looks correct.
Bug or feature? or setup problem?
\usemodule[nath]
\starttext
$ y = (1 + \frac{}{a}{b}) $
$ y = (1 + \frac{a}{b}) $
\stoptext
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] t-nath difficulty
Gary Pajer wrote:
I'm taking a look at nath (via t-nath). Here's the very first thing I
tried:
In the following code, the first formula typesets as I want, and the
second doesn't. But the syntax in the second looks correct.
Bug or feature? or setup problem?
\usemodule[nath]
\starttext
$ y = (1 + \frac{}{a}{b}) $
$ y = (1 + \frac{a}{b}) $
\stoptext
Furthermore: I tried the LaTeX version of nath. It works as expected
(i.e. the second line produces a fraction)
So, ... it's looking like a bug in t-nath, I think.
-gary
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Re: Editor questions: SciTE and Emacs
From: Patrick Gundlach [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gary Pajer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't know how to figure out how up to date my auctex is. C-h v AUCTeX-version RET I checked it out of CVS a while ago, and I haven't been able to update it ... the connection times out. Did you follow the new instruction on svannah.gnu.org? I was having trouble with that, but I finally got it working. My AUCTeX is now CVS-5.324 and emacs is 21.2.1 (cygwin) And I *still* get \stopitemize \startitemize Is there a better place than here to ask about this? -gary ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Editor questions: SciTE and Emacs
I've been working with auctex's context-mode for several weeks now, and I'm absolutely excited about it, it works wonderfully! When I do C-c C-e itemize, I get \start...\stop in the right order. What version of Emacs are you using? 21.1.2, on cygwin I don't know how to figure out how up to date my auctex is. I checked it out of CVS a while ago, and I haven't been able to update it ... the connection times out. Is the ConTeXt support still limited to the CVS version of auctex? -gary ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] Editor questions: SciTE and Emacs
I recall that Hans came up with a ConTeXt mode for SciTE, but I can't find it. Is it still available? I've been playing with the AucTeX ConTeXt mode, but I find that it gets \start and \stop backwards. e.g. if I type C-c C-e itemize I get \stopitemize \startitemize Can anyone comment about this? There are two ConTeXt modes available. How do they compare? Thanks, Gary ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] Text Editor for ConTeXt
I am looking for a text editor for use with ConTeXt that is comparable with those available for Latex (e.g. Kile (http://kile.sourceforge.net/) and TeXnicCenter(http://www.texniccenter.org/front_content.php)). The archives refer to ConTEXT, SciTE and Emacs. Only Emacs with the context.el plug-in appears to compare with Latex editors. However, context.el conflicts with my installation of Emacs (which includes the Auctex package) and will not load. Are there any other editors that are recommended? Any other suggestions? Thank you. Gary Hoffman -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Re: cont-doc module
Ik kan deze module niet vinden in de context download en ook niet op
de pragma site.
these files are now in theregular distribution, so
texexec --modu --pdf somedoc.tex
should work
Well, I now type texexec --modu --pdf font-ini.tex (one of the files
in the ConTeXt distribution)
[...]
! Argument of \next1 has an extra }.
inserted text
\par
to be read again
[...]
...
l.12 ...yright={PRAGMA / Hans Hagen \ Ton Otten}]
Ditto here, regardless of what file I try to process.
Question: Generally do source files contain documentation that goes beyond
(or is more up to date) than the manual?
-gary
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Update failure: I'm losing my mind
Thursday, December 11, 2003 Gary Pajer wrote: MiKTeX. I've done this half a dozen times. This time it doesn't work. I feel stupid. What have I forgotten? Things were working perfectly. I decide to update, so I download cont-tmf.zip to \localtexmf. Then I unzip, overwritting all the old files. Then I update the database either using mktexlsr or the MiKTeX options wizard. But now texexec can't find texexec.ini. But it's there, in \localtexmf\context\config (as well as \texmf\context\config) BTW, if I execute kpsewhich texexec.ini it returns without an error, but also with no information. Is that right? Yes, and that's the problem. Recent ConTeXts are too strongly tied to fpTeX :\ One thing you can do: move your texexec.ini in the same folder as texexec.pl Thanks, but that didn't work. I still have a nagging feeling that I'm forgetting something simple. MiKTeX comes with a texexec.exe. Putting texexec.ini in the same directory doesn't do it either. Is there an environment variable that I can set to help texexec find its way? Or a command line switch? (I have not found mention of either in the docs) (Putting texexec.ini in the directory containing the ConTeXt .tex script works.) -gary ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] Update failure: I'm losing my mind
MiKTeX. I've done this half a dozen times. This time it doesn't work. I feel stupid. What have I forgotten? Things were working perfectly. I decide to update, so I download cont-tmf.zip to \localtexmf. Then I unzip, overwritting all the old files. Then I update the database either using mktexlsr or the MiKTeX options wizard. But now texexec can't find texexec.ini. But it's there, in \localtexmf\context\config (as well as \texmf\context\config) BTW, if I execute kpsewhich texexec.ini it returns without an error, but also with no information. Is that right? -gary ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Re: another itemize question
it is listed as \setupitemgroup are they synonyms? why two names? For those, who still wonder: \setupitemize is a command generated by \defineitemgroup. \defineitemgroup [\v!itemize] [\c!niveaus=6] in core-itm.tex Good idea to clear that up. Now back to our regularly scheduled thread... I'm reaching the conclusion that the behaviour I reported at the top of the thread is a bug. Is it? If so, is a workaround or fix possible? -gary ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: Re[2]: [NTG-context] resolution
Uh du... on Windows its ps2pdf, and it is in ..\gs\lib -gary - Original Message - From: Giuseppe Bilotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 6:29 AM Subject: Re[2]: [NTG-context] resolution Saturday, October 25, 2003 Severin Obertuefer wrote: i get an error when I try this: pstopdf can not be found ... I use MS Windows and Miktex. GS is installed Is it in the path? -- Giuseppe Oblomov Bilotta ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] itemize: before/after only with columns?
It seems to me that the 'before' and 'after' keywords used in the third
argument of \setupitemize are operative only if 'columns' are also
specified. In the example below, the hairlines disappear if the 'columns'
keyword is eliminated.
Feature or bug?
BTW: can the lengths of the two hairlines in this example be made to be
the same length? What's causing the indentation of the first hairline?
Regards,
Gary
-
\setupitemize[2][a,packed,columns][before={\hairline},after={\hairline}]
\setupitemize[1][n]
\starttext
\startitemize
%
\item Level One
%
\startitemize
\item first
\item second
\item third
\stopitemize
%
\item Forgot a level
%
\startitemize
\item one
\item two
\item three
\stopitemize
%
\item Level two
%
\startitemize
\item here's one
\item here's another
\item finally this
\stopitemize
%
\stopitemize
%
\stoptext
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] postscript math font ?
I'm relatively new at ConTeXt, and have been avoiding all issues related to fonts ... till now. I've struggled with the manuals, some source code, the list archives, and google, but I have to cry uncle. I have a MikTeX installation. (would I be better off with TeXLive?) I can use postscipt fonts hence: \setupbodyfont[pos,ber] or \usetypescipt[postscript] The first I got from a suggestion on this list, the second is in Fonts in ConTeXt. They both seem to work. But they both set math in computer modern. The example in Fonts in ConTeXt has math set in something that is *not* cm. And when I use LaTeX, my math fonts are not cm. So how can I get a better looking (IMHO) math font when using postscript? What's the difference between the two ways of setting postscipt fonts? tia, Gary ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
