Are you looking for an inline table? If so, here is the snippet of the
code that I had gotten from somewhere. Perhaps some examples from
Hans.
\starttext
\installframedlocator {table}
{}
{\hbox{\lower\dimexpr\dp\strutbox+.25ex+.4pt\relax\box\framebox}}
\defineframed
[inlinetable]
[locati
That is a pretty interesting ConTeXt question. I mean it makes a
laudable effort to bring ConTeXt into its context!!
On 8/9/07, Idris Samawi Hamid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear gang,
>
> To all you expert script writers and batch wizards on Windows, I have a
> question:
>
> I want to create a
right syntax but formats incorrectly.
-Hamid
On 8/9/07, Wolfgang Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/8/9, Hamid Kamrani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Aditya,
> >
> > In the example you give with CMID you have only two column preambles
> > whereas the tab
Aditya,
In the example you give with CMID you have only two column preambles
whereas the table has 3 columns and if one adds the missing preamble
then one gets an error. Some how your new code breaks the calculation
for number of columns.
-Hamid
On 8/8/07, Aditya Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Here is a minimal example of how this happens. I had posted it sometime back.
\starttext
\setupitemize[each][][stopper=:]
\bTABLE
\bTR
\bTD
\startitemize[a]
\item Bla
\item Blub
\item Bautz
\stopitemize
\eTD
\eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
On 7/27/07, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wolfgang Werne
Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/7/4, Hamid Kamrani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Not exactly. I only framed it in order to demonstrate my problem. You
> > may encounter it even when you don't explicitly frame the table. I
> > became aware of it when I notice
must put an invisible frame around the table.
On 7/4/07, Wolfgang Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/7/3, Hamid Kamrani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Got it. Thanks. I didn't know that the chars after setupTABLE could
> > disturb the alignment.
> >
&g
What does this have to do with ConTeXt? Is this Spam mail?
On 7/3/07, paul.kholer paul.kholer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Joe Merlo
>
>
>
> Powerit Holdings, Inc. the leading provider of intelligent, automated demand
> control & demand response systems for industrial and commercial buildings,
>
Got it. Thanks. I didn't know that the chars after setupTABLE could
disturb the alignment.
On 7/3/07, Wolfgang Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/7/2, Hamid Kamrani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > What's the reaosn for this behaviour?
> >
> > Try:
>
What's the reaosn for this behaviour?
Try:
\starttext
\startbuffer
\start
\setupTABLE[frame=on]
\bTABLE\bTR\bTD text \eTD\eTR\eTABLE
\stop
\stopbuffer
\framed[offset=overlay]{\getbuffer}
\startbuffer
\start
\setupTABLE[frame=on]
\setupTABLE[c][1][align=right]
\bTABLE\bTR\bTD text \eTD\eTR\eTABLE
This happens on live context too. Itemize starts with 0 in some
situations. You can create the problem with:
\starttext
\bTABLE
\bTR
\bTD
\startitemize[n]
\item one
\item two
\stopitemize
\eTD
\eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
On 7/1/07, Aditya Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, [EMA
And so you did. This is beautiful. Thank you Hans.
On 6/25/07, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> > Hamid Kamrani wrote:
> >>
> >> Taco, I very much appreciate your solution. It allows me to continue
> >> for now but I humbly
again,
-Hamid
On 6/25/07, Taco Hoekwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hamid Kamrani wrote:
> >
> > Taco, I very much appreciate your solution. It allows me to continue
> > for now but I humbly ask, in fact, beg to have a solution built in the
> > core of ConTeXt.
Thank you, Hans, for directing me to use streams. Not only it takes
care of this problem it also shows me how to do some other stuff that
I had struggled with.
-Hamid
On 6/24/07, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hamid Kamrani wrote:
> > Hi Wolfgang,
> >
> > Than
On 6/24/07, Hamid Kamrani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/24/07, Taco Hoekwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hamid Kamrani wrote:
> > > Taco and Wolfang,
> > >
> > > Thanks both for your responses.
> > > But:
> > > 1. The set
On 6/24/07, Taco Hoekwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hamid Kamrani wrote:
> > Taco and Wolfang,
> >
> > Thanks both for your responses.
> > But:
> > 1. The setup offered by Taco does not line up the numerals on the
> > dots. Maybe my problem
ROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 23:13:22 -0400
> "Hamid Kamrani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > At least in the U.S., it is the rule and a strict requirement to
> > typeset vertical lists in such a way that the numerals align on the
> > dot or pare
At least in the U.S., it is the rule and a strict requirement to
typeset vertical lists in such a way that the numerals align on the
dot or parenthesis following the numeral.
(even the daily violation of the rule by some of the most widely used
word processors such as MS Word has not changed this
yourself?
\startitemize[5, columns, two]
\item Excellent student \item Good student \item Mediocre student
\item Poor student
\stopitemize
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Thanks,
-Hamid
On 6/22/07, Wolfgang Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/6/21, Hamid Kamran
I am just wondering if this is a bug or feature or some lack of
understanding on my part. The horizontal list turns into a vertical
list inside a framedtext environment. The same happens in a background
environment.
\starttext
\startframedtext[width=\textwidth]
\startitemize[5, columns, fo
Is it possible to create and place a float in ConTeXt containing both
text and graphics?
In the following sample code a framedtext is created containing a
figuretext but when placing the framedtext as a float on a doublesided
page layout the placement at bottom of the odd page has extra white
spac
21 matches
Mail list logo
