Marcin Borkowski schrieb:
What is the difference between the above?
In particular, do I get this correctly:
(*) 2SIDE just puts 2 pages onto one sheet, in the following order:
1 2
3 4
...
(*) 2UP prepares a booklet
BTW: I just wanted to say „Thank You!“ for the 2*2*4 arranging
On 9/24/2008 11:01 PM, Peter Daum wrote:
Hi all
I'm using Taco's Bibtex module and got some problems with it.
\setupbibtex[database=xx,sort=author]
\setuppublications[alternative=apa-de,refcommand=authoryear,monthconversion=month]
\placepublications[criterium=all]
... works fine.
minimum source:
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\starttext
\useURL[u][http://www.x.com/]
see \from[u].
\stoptext
It works:
• in MKⅡ
• in MKⅣ only if the first line is commented, i.e. without
setupinteraction.
It doesn't work in MKⅣ, no change by updating to latest.
Are there any known
On 9/24/2008 1:03 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Matthias Wächter wrote:
Are there any known workarounds? It makes my bibliography
undeliverable …
Works for me. What versions are you running?
Thanks for checking. I'm running Win32 here and executed a simple
texexec texmfstart --luatex test
I
On 9/24/2008 5:31 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hmm indeed. But there will be a new luatex in just a few more days,
maybe you can wait for that?
I'd like to, but I can't. Tomorrow is the day for the thesis to get
lasered and processed by the bookbinder. :-)
Thanks for your support, I am lucky that
Folks,
Just wanted to send the following patch, requesting inclusion to
ConTeXt. It adds support for headstyle option in \setupsynonyms by
passing it to \definedescription.
Maybe the \style option of \definedescription could be set by an
additional option for \setupsynonyms as well, but as
Hans,
Do you know how this can be fixed? Is the descripion descriptive enough?
Thanks,
- Matthias
On 7/30/2008 10:23 AM, Matthias Wächter wrote:
On 7/29/2008 11:22 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Matthias Wächter wrote:
Hans, do you feel something about the issue?
only if i get a test file
On 8/5/2008 6:37 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Matthias Wächter wrote:
Do you know how this can be fixed? Is the descripion descriptive enough?
will be fixed in the next release (tomorrow we plan to do a formal release)
Thanks! I am looking forward to the change as I am curious what’s the proper
On 8/5/2008 6:48 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Matthias Wächter wrote:
On 8/5/2008 6:37 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Matthias Wächter wrote:
Do you know how this can be fixed? Is the descripion descriptive enough?
will be fixed in the next release (tomorrow we plan to do a formal release)
Thanks! I am
On 7/29/2008 11:22 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Matthias Wächter wrote:
Hans, do you feel something about the issue?
only if i get a test file and a description of expected behaviour
Sure, here it is. removing the comment on the \word version works only in MKIV,
i.e. LuaTeX, but that’s
On 7/25/2008 11:30 AM, Matthias Wächter wrote:
On 7/24/2008 9:49 PM, Peter Münster wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24 2008, Matthias Wächter wrote:
What am I doing wrong? \Word, \Words and \WORDS cannot be applied to
synonyms, they are displayed unmodified which is a pity as these words
should
On 7/24/2008 9:49 PM, Peter Münster wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24 2008, Matthias Wächter wrote:
What am I doing wrong? \Word, \Words and \WORDS cannot be applied to
synonyms, they are displayed unmodified which is a pity as these words
should be capitalized at the beginning of a sentence
Hi list!
What am I doing wrong? \Word, \Words and \WORDS cannot be applied to synonyms,
they are displayed unmodified which is a pity as these words should be
capitalized at the beginning of a sentence. Is there a solution?
\starttext
\definesynonyms[term][terms]
Hans,
Hans Hagen schrieb:
Matthias Wächter wrote:
I really wonder why this is not implemented. It's so easy to do in
LaTeX, and we _really_ need it for our review process. I will never
convince my boss to change to ConTeXt without document-wide line numbers
:/
afaik in latex they tweak
Hi!
Just wondering how I can manage to number all the lines of my document.
Thought that this would work but it actually doesn't.
\starttext
\startlinenumbering
\chapter{First}
A paragraph
Another paragraph.
\chapter{Second}
Wait and see---nothing.
\stoplinenumbering
\stoptext
Is there a
Hi Taco, any progress?
- Matthias
On 24.10.2006 15:13, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi Matthias,
I goofed somewhere, that's for sure. Are you in a real hurry, or can
I take a day or two staring at it?
Taco
Matthias Wächter wrote:
Hi Taco,
I ran into the following problems:
1. see
Hi Taco,
I ran into the following problems:
1. see attached files. Three bib entries with different authors, but the resulting references are the same for two of them (!).
Appearantly, without sorting the bib entries, the extra label numbering does not work correctly. Changing \setupbibtex to
On 24.10.2006 15:13, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
I goofed somewhere, that's for sure. Are you in a real hurry, or can
I take a day or two staring at it?
No hurry, please. :) Thanks for taking care.
- Matthias
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
On 17.07.2006 21:35, Hans Hagen wrote:
Matthias Wächter wrote:
Naively, I thought that the --tempdir option would allow the 'temporary'
files created/updated at a run of texexec be written to whatever is given as
--tempdir=/dir/, but it doesn't work, the files remain in the current
On 18.07.2006 10:29, Hans Hagen wrote:
if it's because of the temp files. you can run with --purge and get them
removed
Well, then Context could not benefit from incremental builds with just one
run instead of 4 to 5 runs. But I get the idea.
eh ... the tuo file is kept
Appearantly, only
Hi,
Naively, I thought that the --tempdir option would allow the 'temporary' files
created/updated at a run of texexec be written to whatever is given as
--tempdir=/dir/, but it doesn't work, the files remain in the current
directory. Additionally, --output seems to disallow the output be put
Hi!
Pardon me for requesting more support from pragma-ade prior to ever using the
mailing list for general support questions. Maybe I should post this one
directly to Hans but others might be interested in this issue as well.
Despite my little but growing knowledge of Context I am currently
Taco Hoekwater schrieb:
Matthias Wächter wrote:
Is there a strong motivation against having versioned package file names,
possibly with some months/years of history?
Or is this archive available but I am unable to find it? ;)
There is an archive of old releases and file versions on-line
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Matthias Wächter wrote:
https://foundry.supelec.fr/frs/?group_id=14 gives me quite some versions of
Context, but the download paths for each precise version is not related to
the
release date or the SVN revision,
Correct. SVN release ids have numbers, not dates
24 matches
Mail list logo
