Wolfgang Schuster a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Morgan Brassel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
The \digits command is really great when it comes to typeset numbers in
different languages. However, I miss one functionality from the numprint
package in latex: when you
Hi everyone,
The \digits command is really great when it comes to typeset numbers in
different languages. However, I miss one functionality from the numprint
package in latex: when you type for example $e-5$, you get 10^{-5} (with
no dot in front of it).
Would it be possible to add an option
Hi everyone,
In the following example:
\define[1]\com{com\ #1}
\starttext
\com{1} $\com{1}$
\stoptext
the second call to \com (the one in math mode) seems to stop the
compilation of the file. Is it a bug? It wasn't happening before. I'm
using the latest minimals.
Best regards,
Morgan
Hi everyone,
I noticed what seems to be a lack of coherence when typesetting references
with interaction enabled. Look at the example below:
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\starttext
See \in{figure}[fig:a]. {\it See \in{figure}[fig:a].}
\placefigure
[][fig:a]
{A caption.}
{HELLO}
On Sun, 6 Apr 2008, Hans Hagen wrote:
Morgan Brassel wrote:
Hi everyone,
I noticed what seems to be a lack of coherence when typesetting references
with interaction enabled. Look at the example below:
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\starttext
See \in{figure}[fig:a]. {\it See \in{figure
Hi everyone, Hi Mojca,
I finally compiled gnuplot with support for the context terminal. It was
really easy in the end, I should not have been afraid...
I have two questions however (see example below):
* Does the option 'solid' work with the context terminal? I still get
dashed lines
You can use
\setupGNUPLOTterminal
[context]
[dashed=no,
textscale=0.9]
Thank you, Mojca!
The dashed option is ok, but I didn't manage to have 'textscale' work:
adding these lines in my previous example still gives 12pt font... Am I
missing something?
* ' and quotes do not give
Hi everyone,
I'm currently learning how to use the gnuplot module (thank you Mojca, and
all the others, for this great tool!). I stick for now with the metapost
terminal, as I'm not sure I'd be able to recompile gnuplot in order to add
the context terminal.
It seems that accents are not
?
- Is there a way to get UTF-8 accented latin characters out of plain
metapost files when using mptopdf?
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Morgan Brassel wrote:
Hi everyone,
Hello Morgan,
I'm currently learning how to use the gnuplot module (thank you Mojca, and
all the others, for this great tool!). I
Hi everyone,
I am wondering about the effects of the 'margin=yes' option in itemize
environments. It seems to be incompatible with the 'packed' option.
In the following example, the third itemize doesn't get packed, even if
the 'packed' option is present. Is it a feature? In this case, how can
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hi Morgan,
I am wondering about the effects of the 'margin=yes' option in itemize
environments. It seems to be incompatible with the 'packed' option.
you can't use assignments and commands in the same argument.
D'oh! Now I feel terribly sorry
Does this do what you want?
%\TracingFormats=1
\starttable[|b{\digits}r|]
\NC 1.@@ \NC \AR
\NC 1.1@ \NC \AR
\NC 1.11 \NC \AR
\NC 11.11 \NC \AR
\stoptable
Aditya
Hi Aditya,
Thank you for this solution. I saw it on the wiki before I sent my first
e-mail: it is actually less
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:
Does this do what you want?
%\TracingFormats=1
\starttable[|b{\digits}r|]
\NC 1.@@ \NC \AR
\NC 1.1@ \NC \AR
\NC 1.11 \NC \AR
\NC 11.11 \NC \AR
\stoptable
Aditya
Hi Aditya,
Thank you
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:
3) Aditya, I saw your remark in your 'My Way' concerning the 'multline'
environment. I must admit I would really be glad to see it appear in
ConTeXt! I'm afraid I'm not able to implement it myself... I use
'?
Best wishes,
Morgan
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently trying to typeset tables of digits. I read in This Way #3
that the tabulate environment has digits support with \NN. Would it be
possible to had the same feature in the table environment?
By the way, I'd like
What exactly are you trying to achieve? I do not completely know all the
features of digits. But table has a numerical columns n and q, see
http://www.tug.org/TUGboat/Articles/tb29-1/tb91mahajan.pdf. There are also
\HC (hook column) which can do certain things. Can you give an example of
a
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Morgan Brassel wrote:
Hi,
I think I discovered a bug in the 'num' alternative of the bib module. It
seems to be incompatible with the prefix=+ option of referencing.
Yes, indeed. It is doubtful that it ever will be compatible with
prefixes
Hi,
I'm currently trying to typeset tables of digits. I read in This Way #3
that the tabulate environment has digits support with \NN. Would it be
possible to had the same feature in the table environment?
By the way, I'd like to congratulate Hans for the \digits command: it
really saved me
Hi everyone,
In LaTeX, the numprint package provides the \numprint command, and is
pretty useful when typing numbers. It is quite similar to the \digits
ConTeXt command.
However, the two commands differ when it comes to this example:
\numprint{e-1}
\digits e-1
In this case, the \numprint
Hi everyone,
I'm experiencing problems with the xetex engine on debian sid. I'm using the
official packages context and texlive-xetex. Maybe one of you has the same
setup and has a hint... When I try to compile a simple hello world!
document, I get the following message:
This is XeTeXk,
Le Saturday 15 March 2008 17:01:41 Peter Münster, vous avez écrit :
On Sat, Mar 15 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:
I'm experiencing problems with the xetex engine on debian sid. I'm using
the official packages context and texlive-xetex. Maybe one of you has the
same setup and has a hint... When
Hi,
I think I discovered a bug in the 'num' alternative of the bib module. It
seems to be incompatible with the prefix=+ option of referencing. The
following example gives an unknow reference:
% tex file
\usemodule[bib]
\setupbibtex[database=biblio]
\setuppublications[alternative=num]
Le Saturday 15 March 2008 19:26:06 Peter Münster, vous avez écrit :
On Sat, Mar 15 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:
get the following error:
kpathsea: Running mktextfm lmromanslant10-regular
mktextfm: Running mf-nowin -progname=mf \mode:=ljfour; mag:=1;
nonstopmode; input lmromanslant10
Le Friday 14 March 2008 09:00:49 Wolfgang Schuster, vous avez écrit :
What do you want seems to be not possible but you could use the
following solution although it is better to define a new command.
\let\normalin\in
\definereferenceformat
[figref]
[left=\normal,
text=\normal
Hi everyone,
I'm looking for an easy way to typeset all references produced by the \in
command in upshape format (even in an italic paragraph for example). I
tried with the 'left' option of \definereferenceformat, but without good
results.
I would also like to typeset all formulae numbers in
Hi everyone,
I read carefully the two 'My Way' from Aditya regarding math alignment
(thank you for those, they were extremely useful to me, and should maybe get
even
more visibility on the wiki), and I have some questions about it:
1) Is there a way to modify interline spacing in 'cases'
Le Thursday 13 March 2008 13:03:22 Aditya Mahajan, vous avez écrit :
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm looking for an easy way to typeset all references produced by the \in
command in upshape format (even in an italic paragraph for example). I
tried
Le Thursday 13 March 2008 13:23:06 Aditya Mahajan, vous avez écrit :
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:
Hi everyone,
I read carefully the two 'My Way' from Aditya regarding math alignment
(thank you for those, they were extremely useful to me, and should maybe
get even more
Le Thursday 13 March 2008 19:16:02 Wolfgang Schuster, vous avez écrit :
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:03:22 -0400 (EDT)
Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm looking for an easy way to typeset all references produced
Le Friday 14 March 2008 00:48:55 Aditya Mahajan, vous avez écrit :
So, will this user interface be enough:
\startformula \startmultline
\NC line 1 \FR
\NC line 2 \MR
\NC line 3 \LR
\stopmultline \stopformula
Lines with \FR are flush left, lines with \MR are centered, and lines
\definereferenceformat
[eqref]
[left=\bgroup\normal(,
right=)\egroup]
This was my first attempt, but it gave some trouble. I need to go back and
check.
Aditya
I now realize that my first question was not very clear: what I need in fact
is to typeset *all* references obtained by
Selon Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
\defineenumeration[theorem][indenting=always]
This is actually easier to find, because it actually is documented
in texshow: http://texshow.contextgarden.net/
You're right. I found it there just after I sent the mail... Thank you, and
sorry I didn't
Selon Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, misunderstood. You want
\setupformulae[indentnext=auto]
Thank you, Taco! And may I ask the difference with the 'yes' option? Is it
documented somewhere? I'm having a real hard time understanding all the
Selon Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Selon Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I need to typeset theorems with ConTeXt, and I would like to get your
advice
before I begin. I read an interesting
Selon Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, it's clearer to me now. Then I've got one last question on the subject:
I
didn't manage to have paragraph indented inside an 'enumeration' block, is
there
an option to do that? Thank you for your patience!
It is
Hi,
I need to typeset theorems with ConTeXt, and I would like to get your advice
before I begin. I read an interesting post about it on the dev list:
Enhancements to core-des for theorems
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20070601.055815.50e07e4d.en.html
But I was unable to understand
Hi,
Sorry to bother you with this question again, but I didn't get any definitive
answer in the previous discussion: wouldn't it be useful to have a new option in
\setupindenting that indents EVERY paragraph? I mean even after floats,
formulae, heads, etc.
It would be easier than to set every
Selon Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Sorry to bother you with this question again, but I didn't get any
definitive
answer in the previous discussion: wouldn't it be useful to have a new
option in
\setupindenting that indents EVERY paragraph? I mean
Selon Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I need to typeset theorems with ConTeXt, and I would like to get your
advice
before I begin. I read an interesting post about it on the dev list:
Enhancements to core-des for theorems
Hi,
Sorry but I'm going to talk about indenting again. This time, it seems to me
that there is really something wrong with the indentnext=yes option. Look at the
following example, it speaks for itself (or at least I hope so).
\setupindenting[yes,medium]
\setupformulae[indentnext=yes]
\starttext
Selon Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The option indentnext=yes does not handle properly the first situation.
What do
you think?
That works for me as it should. My context: 2008.01.28, pdftex 1.40.5
What are your versions?
I'm using the context package in
Selon Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Selon Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The option indentnext=yes does not handle properly the first situation.
What do
you think?
That works for me as it should. My context: 2008.01.28,
Hi,
It seems that a paragraph after a formula never gets indented, even with the
option \setupindenting[yes,medium]. Is it a feature or a bug? Look at the
following example:
\setupindenting[yes,medium]
\starttext
Indented OK
\startformula
x = 0.
\stopformula
Not indented = bug?
Indented OK
Selon Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We had similar problems with indenting after floats (figures and
tables) and after headings. Paragraphs after these kind of objects
seem to refuse indenting. We tried several options including always
or next with
Hi,
Is there a way in ConTeXt to define new math operators as with
\DeclareMathOperators of AMSlatex?
Thanks for your answers,
Morgan
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Selon Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way in ConTeXt to define new math operators as with
\DeclareMathOperators of AMSlatex?
If I understand correctly, you want to use this command:
\definemathcommand [det] [limop] {\mfunction{det}}
Best
Selon Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Selon Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The superscript in expressions like $R^N$ seems to be typeset with a
bigger
font
size in ConTeXt
Hi,
I'm very new to ConTeXt and I've got some (probably naive) questions about
indenting.
1. According to the ConTeXt Excursion, using \setupindenting[medium] should lead
to indented paragraph. And actually, at least for me, it doesn't... I saw
examples on the wiki with
Hi,
The superscript in expressions like $R^N$ seems to be typeset with a bigger font
size in ConTeXt than in LaTeX. Is it the wanted behaviour? From the typographic
point of view, which is the best of the two renderings?
Thanks for your advice,
Morgan
Hi,
The simple example:
\starttext
\placefigure[][]{$x \to 0$}{My figure}
\stoptext
does not compile, whether it's on my installation or on the live interface.
It seems that there is a problem with using \to in captions... Or maybe I'm
missing something...
Morgan
Selon Wolfgang Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Morgan,
On Jan 21, 2008 2:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm very new to ConTeXt and I've got some (probably naive) questions about
indenting.
1. According to the ConTeXt Excursion, using \setupindenting[medium] should
lead
to
Selon Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The superscript in expressions like $R^N$ seems to be typeset with a bigger
font
size in ConTeXt than in LaTeX. Is it the wanted behaviour? From the
typographic
point of view, which is the best
52 matches
Mail list logo
