Re: [NTG-context] Wrong typesetting of pages in AMS-style, publication list

2010-06-22 Thread Warrence

Taco Hoekwater wrote:

Stefan M?ller wrote:

  Hi,

  I've encountered an issue with the AMS-style publication list (Mark
  IV). When the  bibliography items in my document are typeset in the
  publication list, the attribute pages (from the .bib file; a range
  of pages is specified, e.g. pages = {12--34}) is sometimes preceded
  by p. (e.g. for @incollection), sometimes by pp. (which I would
  think of being correct) and sometimes there is nothing (e.g. for
  @article): no pp./p. and not even a point afterwards ending the
  bib item. Is this behaviour intended?

Well, when bibl-ams.tex was written, there was no good specification
so I just implemented something based on some fuzzy examples. If you
(or anyone else for that matter) know how it should look, just send
a patch and it will be fixed.

Best wishes,
Taco


Okay, I had this problem, too. If I find a reliable and comprehensive 
source for how the AMS-style should look like, I'll try to implement it. 
But currently I am not able to make too much sense out of what I find in 
bibl-ams.tex. Maybe the reason for this is that I'm not much into 
(plain) tex. But anyhow, when I stumble over a specification I'll send 
it to the list.


Thank you,
Stefan.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Wrong spacing before and after commas in math(?)

2010-06-05 Thread Warrence

On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
 Does

 \setupmathematics[autopunctuation=no] % or yes

 give better result? (Are you using MKIV or MKII)?

 Aditya

\setupmathematics[autopunctuation=no] seems to fix the spaces before the 
x, but ..., is still bit ugly. I'm using MkIV, sorry for not 
mentioning it.



 the default setup is for coordinates

 eventually we will have layer that implements settings for specific
 fields as each demand their own rules (same for symbols)

 Hans

Do you mean coordinates like a vector (x,y,z)? I still think that the 
extra space before y and z would be appreciated. But nevertheless, 
different settings for different needs sounds like a good idea.


Thank you,
Stefan.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] some math symbols not working

2010-02-12 Thread Warrence


On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

In addition: \ncong is not aligned with = and \cong


I am not sure what \ncong should map to: 0x2246 or 0x2247? There is
inconsistency between the mappings in char-def and math-vfu which can be fixed
easily once I figure out what is the correct mapping.


My opinion is, that it should be 0x2247 (the whole glyph scored out), 
because that would be the clear negation of the sign (similar to what 
\not\cong should do). Maybe provide another command for 0x2246? \congneq 
or \simneq for example.


And many thanks for fixing this.

Stefan
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


[NTG-context] some math symbols not working

2010-02-08 Thread Warrence

Hi,
I was trying some math symbols and stumbled over the following commands, 
that do not work in my context documents (the comments say what's not 
working exactly). The pasted document works at 
http://live.contextgarden.net/ . I'm using the latest context-minimals 
as provided on the website. Is this a MkIV issue?

In addition: \ncong is not aligned with = and \cong
Thanks in advance!
Stefan

\starttext

\startformula
% the following give Undefined control sequence:
\gneq % \lneq works
\lhd
\rhd
\unlhd
\unrhd
\Diamond
% the following produce no symbol:
\mapsto
\hookleftarrow
\longleftarrow
\Longleftarrow
\longrightarrow
\Longrightarrow
\longleftrightarrow
\Longleftrightarrow
\longmapsto
\hookrightarrow
\Join
\blacksquare
\bowtie
\models
\ncong
% \cong produces the wrong symbol: it shows a dot on top of a plus, but 
there should be a ~ on top of =

\cong
\stopformula

\stoptext
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___