[NTG-context] ConTeXt-mode and AUCTeX

[rb]

I recently switched from context.el to AUCTeX 11.55, with "built in
context-mode".

One feature from the original which I am unable to find within the
AUCTeX version is the automatic prompt (open square bracket) for
arguments with every \start... \stop... pair.

In original I used C-c C-o (tex-context-block), in AUCTeX, I'm using C-c
C-e (to insert any \start \stop pair), not the same command, but the
original doesn't seem to be available.

Is there a way to get the automatic prompt for arguments?

Thank you
-- 
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context

Re: [NTG-context] Re: cygwin/tetex or miktex?

[rb]

"Patrick Gundlach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hello rb,
>
>> Is one of these two preferable when running ConTeXt on windows?
>
> please don't use the subject alone, it is confusing.

Hello Patrick,

Good point, thanks for the reminder and thanks for the suggestions.

> You can also use fptex (or texlive). I'd prefer fptex over miktex over
> tetex/cygwin. But I am not the person to ask, since I haven't seen a
> windows system in a while. Just my impression from reading some
> mailing lists and news groups. You might think of posting your
> experience to this list.

If I have any experiences worth sharing, I shall certainly do so.

Thank-you
-- 
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context

[NTG-context] cygwin/tetex or miktex?

[rb]

Is one of these two preferable when running ConTeXt on windows?

Thank you
-- 
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context

Re: [NTG-context] (can be better done global) ???

[rb]

Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> At 14:22 01/10/2003, you wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>when defining an unusual size for my footnotes
>>
>>\setupfootnotes[bodyfont=8.5pt, ... ]
>>
>>I get an amazing amount of messages
>>
>>bodyfont: bodyfont XXpt is defined (can be better done global)
>>
>>with XX being various sizes. Which makes processing real slow...
>>
>>What is meant by "global defining"?
>>Where should I write a "global" definition and how does it look like?
>>
>>Sorry, but I really have now idea.
>
> \setupbodyfont   [...] : global settings, document level, main text as
> well as headers footers etc
> \switchtobodyfont[...] : local, inside a box or in page stream, but no
> headers etc  ___

i regularly use:

\setupbodyfont[9.5pt], 

i still get 

bodyfont   : bodyfont 6.6pt is defined (can better be done global)
bodyfont   : bodyfont 6.6pt is defined (can better be done global)
bodyfont   : bodyfont 4.7pt is defined (can better be done global)
bodyfont   : bodyfont 4.7pt is defined (can better be done global)
bodyfont   : bodyfont 7.6pt is defined (can better be done global)
bodyfont   : bodyfont 7.6pt is defined (can better be done global)
bodyfont   : bodyfont 5.7pt is defined (can better be done global)
bodyfont   : bodyfont 5.7pt is defined (can better be done global)
bodyfont   : bodyfont 11.3pt is defined (can better be done global)
bodyfont   : bodyfont 11.3pt is defined (can better be done global)
bodyfont   : bodyfont 9.5pt is defined (can better be done global)
bodyfont   : bodyfont 9.5pt is defined (can better be done global)
systems: begin file 030423_scope at line 33

messages during a texexec run.

is this an incorrect way to specify type size?

thanks,

rb
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context