Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt-ifying Kile

2008-01-02 Thread Matija Ċ uklje
} # \loadmapfile \loadsorts \loadsynonyms # \localhsize \logfields \lohi[low]{text}{text} \low{text} # \LR \mainlanguage[language code] \mar[references]{text} \marginrule[number]{text} \margintext[+|-|low][reference]{text} \marking[name]{text} \markversion \mathematics{text} \mediaeval{text} \midaligned

Re: [NTG-context] mark ii/iv

2006-11-22 Thread Jano Kula
it clearer: not level of versioning, but axis of versioning. but still, how do we call it? mk version? and how we call the usual version then? i want to avoid confusion when speaking about version. guess which one ;) there is already a command \markversion, but it doesn't seem to have something

Re: [NTG-context] mark ii/iv

2006-11-22 Thread Hans Hagen
: date related version there is already a command \markversion, but it doesn't seem to have something in common with this versioning. no, mostly to do with auto mkii/iv suffix loading Hans