there is no mention
about this problem in the list, I think that it is my only problem,
Should I do something special for this?
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula\startalign[align={middle, left}]
\NC x \NC = n\times r, \NR[+]
\NC y \NC = {{n-1}\choose {r-1}}, \NR[+]
\NC z \NC = (n-1)\times
, don't need) the
sub numbering per-line, just a regular number would do.
Minimal example:
\starttext
My equation \in[eq:equation] and my other equation \in[eq:other-equation].
\placeformula[eq:equation]
\startformula
E = mc^2
\stopformula
\placeformula[eq:equation]
Typo \placeformula
example:
\starttext
My equation \in[eq:equation] and my other equation \in[eq:other-equation].
\placeformula[eq:equation]
\startformula
E = mc^2
\stopformula
\placeformula[eq:equation]
Typo \placeformula[eq:other-equation]. Still doesn't work.
\startformula
\startcases
\NC E = mc^2 \NC
even get recorded. I precise that I don't want (well, don't need) the
sub numbering per-line, just a regular number would do.
Minimal example:
\starttext
My equation \in[eq:equation] and my other equation \in[eq:other-equation].
\placeformula[eq:equation]
\startformula
E = mc^2
per-line, just a regular number would do.
Minimal example:
\starttext
My equation \in[eq:equation] and my other equation \in[eq:other-equation].
\placeformula[eq:equation]
\startformula
E = mc^2
\stopformula
\placeformula[eq:equation]
\startformula
\startcases
\NC E = mc^2 \NC some text
On 11-12-2010 1:58, views63 wrote:
Hi all,
cross reference is not worked in latest beta (MkIV)
example:
\starttext
\placeformula[f]
\startformula
{\bf d}(t)=(1-t)^2{\bf b}_{0,0}+2(1-t)t\Big[\frac{1}{2}{\bf
b}_{0,1}+\frac{1}{2}{\bf b}_{1,0}\Big]+t^2{\bf b}_{1,1}.
\stopformula
see (\in[f
Thank you. It works well now.
--
Best regards,
Huang Ze
2010/12/13 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl:
On 11-12-2010 1:58, views63 wrote:
Hi all,
cross reference is not worked in latest beta (MkIV)
example:
\starttext
\placeformula[f]
\startformula
{\bf d}(t)=(1-t)^2{\bf b}_{0,0}+2(1-t)t
Hi all,
cross reference is not worked in latest beta (MkIV)
example:
\starttext
\placeformula[f]
\startformula
{\bf d}(t)=(1-t)^2{\bf b}_{0,0}+2(1-t)t\Big[\frac{1}{2}{\bf
b}_{0,1}+\frac{1}{2}{\bf b}_{1,0}\Big]+t^2{\bf b}_{1,1}.
\stopformula
see (\in[f])
\stoptext
--
Best regards,
Huang
On 30-11-2010 8:10, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hi Hans,
a fix for strc-mat.mkiv
\unexpanded\def\placeformula
- {\doglobal\settrue\insideplaceformula
+ {\global\settrue\insideplaceformula
\settrue\incrementformulanumber
\dodoubleempty\doplaceformula}
\unexpanded\def\placesubformula
Hi Hans,
a fix for strc-mat.mkiv
\unexpanded\def\placeformula
- {\doglobal\settrue\insideplaceformula
+ {\global\settrue\insideplaceformula
\settrue\incrementformulanumber
\dodoubleempty\doplaceformula}
\unexpanded\def\placesubformula
- {\doglobal\settrue\insideplacesubformula
+ {\global
Hi,
since mkiv (last updated 19.11.) \placeformua causes a bug regarding the
placing of inner- and outermargins.
If you remove the \placeformula in the following example the placing of
inner- and outermargins is right. But as soon there is a \placeformula from
that point on inner
an issues with number of formula in latest beta (MkIV)
example：
\setupenumerations
[formula]
[way=bysection,
prefix=yes,
prefixsegments=chapter:section]
\starttext
\chapter{one}
\section{one}
See formula \in[eq:3]
\section{two}
\placeformula[eq:3]
\startformula
f(x)=x^3
[dummy]}
\placeformula[for:1]
\startformula
a+b
\stopformula
\in{picture}[pic:1]
\in{formula}[for:1]
\stoptext
New beta. Can you check again? Keep in mind that pic: and fig: are also
checked as prefix.
I see from looking at the source code that prefixes are used
:1]{caption}{\externalfigure[dummy]}
\placeformula[for:1]
\startformula
a+b
\stopformula
\in{picture}[pic:1]
\in{formula}[for:1]
\stoptext
New beta. Can you check again? Keep in mind that pic: and fig: are also
checked as prefix.
I see from looking at the source code that prefixes
Hi all,
can someone confirm that picture- and formula-references are broken with the
current beta. Here is a test file:
\starttext
\placefigure[auto][pic:1]{caption}{\externalfigure[dummy]}
\placeformula[for:1]
\startformula
a+b
\stopformula
\in{picture}[pic:1]
\in{formula}[for:1]
\stoptext
On 22-9-2010 11:50, Andreas Harder wrote:
Hi all,
can someone confirm that picture- and formula-references are broken with the
current beta. Here is a test file:
\starttext
\placefigure[auto][pic:1]{caption}{\externalfigure[dummy]}
\placeformula[for:1]
\startformula
a+b
\stopformula
]}
\placeformula[for:1]
\startformula
a+b
\stopformula
\in{picture}[pic:1]
\in{formula}[for:1]
\stoptext
New beta. Can you check again? Keep in mind that pic: and fig: are also
checked as prefix.
Thank you Hans, it works again!
Andreas
.
\placenamedformula[one]{Der einfache Test}
\startformula
c^2 = a^2 + b^2.
\stopformula
\subject{math - subformula}
This works fine.
\startsubformulas[eq:1]
\placeformula[eq:first]
\startformula
PM \xrightarrow R_{PM} \xrightarrow PM
\stopformula
\placeformula[eq:second]
\startformula
R_{PM} = \{ K, F, Z, U, I
Hi,
I also ran into a problem with placeformula and margins. The attached
example runs fine with the margins. But as soon the placeformula is
uncommented the left and right margins are messed up. And if not all
paragraphs have at both side a marginnote is get worse. Is there a way to
solve
in mkii
\placesubformula \NR[+] - mkii mkiv, but (1.name) as number
\placeformula \NR[+] - works in mkii and mkiv, but (1.name) as number
I have a real problem to transform my formula from mkii to mkiv. In mkii I
had following:
\placesubformulawithnumber[gleichung1]
\startformula
\startalign[n=3
in mkii
\placenamedsubformula - works only in mkii
\placesubformula \NR[+] - mkii mkiv, but (1.name) as number
\placeformula \NR[+] - works in mkii and mkiv, but (1.name) as number
- can you post your examples (so that they can be added to the test suite)
- can you also test
Hello,
I am a bit lost. I am using this format for an equation:
-
\placeformula[nohair]
\startformula
\leqalignno{
- M^{}_{\bullet}a^{2}_{\bullet} = M^{}_{2} = -
\frac{J^{2}_{1}}{M^{}_{0}} \,, \cr
- M^{}_{\bullet}a^{3}_{\bullet
Hi Pau,
You should not use \leqaligno, but rather setup the location of the formulas'
numbers to the left and then use \eqalign: the following works fine:
%%-
\setupformulas[location=left]
\define[1]\eqref{(\in[#1])} % this definition is optional…
\starttext
\placeformula[nohair
] [left=(,right=),label=figure]
\placeformula[x]\startformula a \stopformula
\starttabulate[|]
\NC \in [x] \NC \in {left}[x] \NC \in {}{right}[x] \NC \in
{left}{right}[x] \NC \NR
\NC \intesta[x] \NC \intesta{left}[x] \NC \intesta{}{right}[x] \NC
\intesta{left}{right}[x] \NC \NR
Hi everybody,
I'm new to ConTeXt and need a little expert help. When I'm running the
following 'test.tex' file
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformulas
\startformula
\startalign
\NC A \NC = B \NR[+]
\NC C \NC = D \NR[+]
\stopalign
\stopformula
\startformula E \stopformula
on the subject, in TeX, LaTeX and ConTeXt we have:
$$ displayed math $$
and additionally in LaTeX, we have:
\begin*{equation}
displayed math
\end{equation}
while in ConTeXt we have
\placeformula [-]
$$ displayed math $$
or, alternately (to get spacing right)
\placeformula
taco wrote:
Hi,
Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Another problem fixed by my patch:
\definereferenceformat[ineq][text=equation]
\starttext
\placeformula[first]
\startformula 1=1\stopformula
\ineq[first]
\stoptext
printed 1, not equation 1.
This problem is still there and needs fixing
important numbers appear:
\placeformula
\startformula
{\rm e}^{{\rm i}\pi} + 1 = 0.
\stopformula
By the way, $\int_{0}^{2\pi} \sin(x)dx = 0$, while
\startformula
\int_{0}^{2\pi} \sin^2(x)dx = \pi.
\stopformula
\startitemize[r]
\item Testing items and footnotes\footnote{This is a silly remark\dots}
\item
Hi!
I try the following with current beta:
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\starttext
\placeformula[eq:test]
\startformula
1=1
\stopformula
\pagebreak
\in[eq:test]
\stoptext
When I click on the link, nothing happens. The links generated by
LaTeX+hyperref work in the same viewer (okular
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Yury G. Kudryashov ur...@ya.ru wrote:
Hi!
I try the following with current beta:
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\starttext
\placeformula[eq:test]
\startformula
1=1
\stopformula
\pagebreak
\in[eq:test]
\stoptext
When I click on the link, nothing
luigi scarso wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Yury G. Kudryashov ur...@ya.ru wrote:
Hi!
I try the following with current beta:
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\starttext
\placeformula[eq:test]
\startformula
1=1
\stopformula
\pagebreak
\in[eq:test]
\stoptext
When I click
Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hi!
I try the following:
\definereferenceformat[ineq][left=(,right=),text=Equation]
\starttext
\placeformula[first]
\startformula
2=2
\stopformula
In \in[first] ineq \ineq[first] in \in[first].
\stoptext
The result is:
2 = 2 (1)
In 1 ineq (1) in (1
patch:
\definereferenceformat[ineq][text=equation]
\starttext
\placeformula[first]
\startformula 1=1\stopformula
\ineq[first]
\stoptext
printed 1, not equation 1.
This problem is still there and needs fixing, but I think your patch
has a bug (possibly because of the already done other bugfix
this beta will be published.
Another problem fixed by my patch:
\definereferenceformat[ineq][text=equation]
\starttext
\placeformula[first]
\startformula 1=1\stopformula
\ineq[first]
\stoptext
printed 1, not equation 1.
This problem is still there and needs fixing, but I think your patch
Hi!
I try the following:
\definereferenceformat[ineq][left=(,right=),text=Equation]
\starttext
\placeformula[first]
\startformula
2=2
\stopformula
In \in[first] ineq \ineq[first] in \in[first].
\stoptext
The result is:
2 = 2 (1)
In 1 ineq (1) in (1).
It seems that \ineq doesn't clear some
Hi!
The following example from http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math/Display#Sub-
Formula_Numbering doesn't work in MKIV:
\startsubformulas[eq:1]
\placeformula[eq:first]
\startformula
c^2 = a^2 + b^2
\stopformula
\placeformula[eq:second]
\startformula
c^2 = a^2 + b^2
\stopformula
\stopsubformulas
On 15-5-2010 4:55, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hi!
The following example from http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math/Display#Sub-
Formula_Numbering doesn't work in MKIV:
\startsubformulas[eq:1]
\placeformula[eq:first]
\startformula
c^2 = a^2 + b^2
\stopformula
\placeformula[eq:second
][fig:Circle]{A circle}{\useMPgraphic{Circle}}
\placeformula[eq:pythag]
\startformula
c^2
= a^2 + b^2
\stopformula
\section{Second section}
See \in{Figure}[fig:Circle] on \at{page}[fig:Circle].
See \in{equation}[eq:pythag] for Pythagoras.
\placefigure[here][fig:Circle2]{Another
circle
\getbuffer[gnu]
\stoptext
5.) Weird formula number placement when long equations are used in MKIV
\def\oklepaj#1{\left(#1\right)}
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
{\dot N}(t)=
A\oklepaj{\exp\oklepaj{-\frac{t-t_0}{τ_{\text{eksp.-\exp\oklepaj{-\frac{t-t_0}{τ_{\text{fast}+
B
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
5.) Weird formula number placement when long equations are used in MKIV
\def\oklepaj#1{\left(#1\right)}
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
{\dot N}(t)=
A\oklepaj{\exp\oklepaj{-\frac{t-t_0}{τ_{\text{eksp.-\exp\oklepaj{-\frac{t-t_0}{τ_{\text{fast}+
B
number placement when long equations are used in MKIV
\def\oklepaj#1{\left(#1\right)}
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
{\dot N}(t)=
A\oklepaj{\exp\oklepaj{-\frac{t-t_0}{τ_{\text{eksp.-\exp\oklepaj{-\frac{t-t_0}{τ_{\text{fast}+
B\oklepaj{\exp\oklepaj{-\frac{t-t_0}{τ_{\text{eksp
Dear list,
the following example gives me unexpected format of the last reference
to the section
\definereferenceformat[eqref][left={(},right={)}]
\starttext
\section[sec:test]{Test}
We are now in \in{Section}{}[sec:test].
\placeformula[eq:general]
\startformula
A=B
\stopformula
In~\eqref
On 3/15/2010 2:21 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Mehdi Omidali wrote:
Hi,
Finally, after reading source code of math-ali.mkiv, I found the best way to
typeset my multiline equation as follows
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
\startalign[n=3]
This means
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Mehdi Omidali wrote:
On 3/15/2010 2:21 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Mehdi Omidali wrote:
Hi,
Finally, after reading source code of math-ali.mkiv, I found the best way
to
typeset my multiline equation as follows
\starttext
\placeformula
On 3/15/2010 8:10 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Mehdi Omidali wrote:
ConTeXt does not support that directly, but you can fake it.
\def\NRtag{\global\let\doalignNC\dodoalignNC\doalignNRtag}%
\def\doalignNRtag[#1]%
{#1\crcr}
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
Hi,
Finally, after reading source code of math-ali.mkiv, I found the best
way to typeset my multiline equation as follows
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
\startalign[n=3]
\NC x^2 + y^2 \NC = z^2 \NC \NR[eq:1]
\NC\NC = w^2 \NC + u^2\NC \text{(by \in{Equation}[eq:2])} \cr
\NC\NC + v
[numbercolor=blue,numberstyle=bold]
\starttext
\chapter{Math formulae numbering}
\section{Does not work}
Numbering formulae by section
\placeformula
\startformula
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
\stopformula
\section{More ...}
\stoptext
Also tried the solution from Contextgarden (
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math/Display
=bysection] % --- this used to work, but does not
\setupformulas[numbercolor=blue,numberstyle=bold]
\starttext
\chapter{Math formulae numbering}
\section{Does not work}
Numbering formulae by section
\placeformula
\startformula
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
\stopformula
\section{More ...}
\stoptext
Also
are interested in the study of the following Schrödinger
system of equations: find an infinite sequence
$(\lambda_{m},\phi_{m})_{m\geq1}$ and a potential $V$ satisfying
\showeqref{Eigen, Potential}
\placeformula
\startformula
\startalign[n=3]
\NC {-1\over 2} \Delta \phi_{m} + V\phi_{m} \NC
pointers on how to fix this.
A cleaner way to achieve the same output is
\starttext
\startsubformulas[eq:sub]
\placesubformula
Sorry, this should have been \placeformula.
\startformula \startalign
\NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[eq:1]
\NC a_2 x + b_2 y \NC = c_2 \NR[eq:2]
\stopalign
, the \makesectionnumber and \rawreference macros have be
removed.
I wonder if anyone can give pointers on how to fix this.
A cleaner way to achieve the same output is
\starttext
\startsubformulas[eq:sub]
\placesubformula
Sorry, this should have been \placeformula.
\startformula \startalign
\NC a_1 x + b_1 y
Hello,
thanks again for all answers regarding labelling. It has mostly worked but I am
now having a particular problem with leqalignno.
It turns out that the \placeformula[mylabel] works as expected but for
\leqalignno
This is an example:
--
\placeformula[Pflux
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009, Pau wrote:
Hello,
thanks again for all answers regarding labelling. It has mostly worked but I am
now having a particular problem with leqalignno.
It turns out that the \placeformula[mylabel] works as expected but for
\leqalignno
This is an example
Hi all,
I want to give the references in the appendix of my work a prefix A,
e.g. eq. (\in[eq:A-somewhat]) referencing to \placeformula[eq:A-somewhat]
should produce eq. (A-1) if this is the first equation in the appendix.
Does ConTeXt have this feature?
Thanks for any hint,
Albrecht
Albrecht Kauffmann wrote:
Hi all,
I want to give the references in the appendix of my work a prefix A,
e.g. eq. (\in[eq:A-somewhat]) referencing to \placeformula[eq:A-somewhat]
should produce eq. (A-1) if this is the first equation in the appendix.
Does ConTeXt have this feature?
If you
Hello!
I've tried the following example (from wiki):
\starttext
\startsubformulas[eq:1]
\placeformula[eq:first]
\startformula
c^2 = a^2 + b^2
\stopformula
\placeformula[eq:second]
\startformula
c^2 = a^2 + b^2
\stopformula
\stopsubformulas
Formula (\in[eq:1]) states
]
\starttext
\chapter{Test}
\section{Test}
\placeformula[eq:test]
\startformula
a + b
\stopformula
Eq \in[eq:test]
\section{Test 2}
\placeformula[eq:testtwo]
\startformula
a + b
\stopformula
Eq \in[eq:testtwo]
\stoptext
Hi all,
I got a strange unknown reference problem with the following simple
example:
%
\starttext
\placeformula[eq:haha]
\startformula
a^2 + d^2 = c^2
\stopformula
haha \in[eq:haha]
\stoptext
%
After 3 iterations, I saw this message in the log file:
references
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Chen Shenhashh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I got a strange unknown reference problem with the following simple
example:
%
\starttext
\placeformula[eq:haha]
\startformula
a^2 + d^2 = c^2
\stopformula
haha \in[eq:haha]
\stoptext
Hi,
I have
\placeformula[-]
\startformula
F(n) = \startdisplaycases
\NC F(0) + 2 \ln n!! - \frac{n}{2} \ln 2 \MC \text{si } n \text{
parell} \NR
\NC F(1) + 2 \ln n!! - \frac{n+1}{2} \ln 2 \MC \text{si } n \text{
senar} \NR
\stopdisplaycases
\stopformula
and I want to put
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Xan wrote:
Hi,
I have
\placeformula[-]
\startformula
F(n) = \startdisplaycases
\NC F(0) + 2 \ln n!! - \frac{n}{2} \ln 2 \MC \text{si } n \text{ parell}
\NR
\NC F(1) + 2 \ln n!! - \frac{n+1}{2} \ln 2 \MC \text{si } n \text{ senar}
\NR
\stopdisplaycases
\stopformula
,
distance=0.2em]
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula
\startGROUP
\NC E \NC = \NC mc^2 \NR
\NC \Delta \NC = \NC 3 \NR
\stopGROUP
\stopformula
\stoptext
Aditya
___
If your question
snippets):
Everything below works perfectly in mkii.
1) References to equations appear as '??' in the final document
\placeformula[eq:pythag]
\startformula
a^2 = b^2 + c^2
\stopformula
Pythagoras proposed \in{equation}[eq:pythag].
2) References to footnotes appear as '??' inside
Hello,
References to formulas don't work in MKIV:
\placeformula[bla]
\startformula
a+b
\stopformula
\in[bla]
Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
References to formulas don't work in MKIV:
\placeformula[bla]
\startformula
a+b
\stopformula
\in[bla]
probably a few mire don't work; when i've released the new backend code
(in sync with new luatex version) i'll look into structure related
issues again
Hans
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 14:32, Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
References to formulas don't work in MKIV:
\placeformula[bla]
\startformula
a+b
\stopformula
\in[bla]
probably a few mire don't work; when i've released the new backend code (in
sync with new luatex version
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Willi Egger wrote:
Hi,
Hm, it looks like that the referencing mechanism is broken:
in context beta 2009-06-14 Luatex 0.40.5
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula \startalign
\NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[eq:1]
\NC a_2 x + b_2 y \NC = c_2 \NR[eq:2]
\stopalign
Hi,
Thanks Aditya for your reply, unfortunately I posted the wrong part
of my example, where indeed the \placeformula was absent. I have to
tell you that it does not work wit the \placeformula in place.
Sorry. KR
Willi
On Jun 26, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun
(I've included code snippets):
Everything below works perfectly in mkii.
1) References to equations appear as '??' in the final document
\placeformula[eq:pythag]
\startformula
a^2 = b^2 + c^2
\stopformula
Pythagoras proposed \in{equation}[eq:pythag].
2) References to footnotes appear
.
Can someone, PLEASE, tell me if they get any of the following problems with
mkiv (I've included code snippets):
Everything below works perfectly in mkii.
1) References to equations appear as '??' in the final document
\placeformula[eq:pythag]
\startformula
a^2 = b^2 + c^2
\stopformula
that one plus one equals two
How would you write that in ConTeXt?
\placeformula[label]
\startformula
.
\stopformula
And for a figure?
\placefigure
[here] % location
[fig.MyCaption
]
---
\begin{equation}
1 + 1 = 2
\label{eq.1}
\end{equation}
In Eq. \ref{eq.1}, we show that one plus one equals two
How would you write that in ConTeXt?
\placeformula[label
(A)$, $r_i, s_j \in R$, on aquestes igualtats són
dins el grup lliure $F(A)$. Com que $w = u v$ també dins el grup lliure, tenim
que
\placeformula[-] \startformula \startsplit
\NC w = u v \NC = \bigl( \prod_{i = 1}^N x_i^{-1} r_i x_i \bigr) \cdot \bigl(
\prod_{j=1}^M y_j^{-1} s_j y_j \bigr) \NR
\placeformula[eq:pythag]
\startformula
a^2 = b^2 + c^2
\stopformula
Pythagoras proposed \in{equation}[eq:pythag].
\stoptext
Best regards,
Richard
Converteam UK Ltd. Registration Number: 5571739 and Converteam Ltd.
Registration Number: 2416188
Registered in England and Wales.
Registered office
igualtats són dins el grup lliure $F(A)$. Com que $w = u v$ també dins
el grup lliure, tenim que
\placeformula[-] \startformula \startsplit
\NC w = u v \NC = \bigl( \prod_{i = 1}^N x_i^{-1} r_i x_i \bigr) \cdot
\bigl( \prod_{j=1}^M y_j^{-1} s_j y_j \bigr) \NR
\NC \NC = (x_1^{-1} r_1 x_1)\cdots
, s_j \in R$, on aquestes
igualtats són dins el grup lliure $F(A)$. Com que $w = u v$ també dins
el grup lliure, tenim que
\placeformula[-] \startformula \startsplit
\NC w = u v \NC = \bigl( \prod_{i = 1}^N x_i^{-1} r_i x_i \bigr)
\cdot \bigl( \prod_{j=1}^M y_j^{-1} s_j y_j \bigr) \NR
\NC \NC
setzt die
beiden letztgenannten Formate ein.
Hier ein Beispiel für den Mathematiksatz von \TeX{}:
\startlinecorrection
\vskip-.5\baselineskip
\placeformula
\startformula
\startmathalignment[m=2,distance=2em]%Notice distance=2em
\NC \nabla\cdot \bf E \NC= \frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0},
\NC \nabla
result. mkii can't.
\definemathcommand[Prob][nolop]{\mfunction{Prob}}
\def\Pt{P_{\rm T}}
\def\Timp{\tau_{\rm imp}}
\def\Tp{\tau_{\rm p}}
\def\Wt{w_{\rm T}}
\def\Vp{V_{\rm p}^\prime}
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
\eqalign{
\Pt = \Prob \left( {\Timp\over\Tp}1 \right)\cr
=\Prob
}
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
\eqalign{
\Pt = \Prob \left( {\Timp\over\Tp}1 \right)\cr
=\Prob \bigg({\Wt\over\Vp} \Tp \bigg)\cr}
\stopformula
\stoptext
Yue Wang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well
T}}
\def\Vp{V_{\rm p}^\prime}
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
\eqalign{
\Pt = \Prob \left( {\Timp\over\Tp}1 \right)\cr
=\Prob \bigg({\Wt\over\Vp} \Tp \bigg)\cr}
\stopformula
\stoptext
Minimal example: In MkII 2009.04.17
\starttext
$\bigg($
\stoptext
gives
! Missing number, treated
.
Here
\starttext
$\ddot a$
\stoptext
works fine (see attached pdf). I am using
ConTeXt ver: 2009.04.13 14:45 MKII fmt: 2009.4.13 int: english/english
Can you create a minimal example that fails?
Aditya
Yes. I think I have found the problem:
\starttext
\placeformula
that update I only get an crossed a with an accent,
but no ä.
\starttext
\usetypescript[times][ec]
\setupbodyfont[times,11pt]
\placeformula
\startformula
Knappheit = \frac{Stimmen\ f \ddot{u}r\ erstplatzierte\ Partei -
Stimmen\ f\ddot{u}r\
zweitplatzierte\ Partei}{G\ddot{u}ltige\
Stimmen
,
indenting=first,
distance=0.5em,
way=bysection,
]
\subsubsection[ksec:paulitvad]{The Pauli operator in $\mathbb{R}^2$}
A charged spin $1/2$ particle is described by the Pauli Hamiltonian, which acts in $L_2(\mathbb{R}^2)\otimes \mathbb{C}^2$, and is formally defined as
\placeformula
Yue Wang wrote:
Oh, Hans, another bug report, pls test this (come from my thesis):
\usetypescript[palatino]
\setupbodyfont[palatino,rm]
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
P_{(i,j)}=\sum_{n=1}^{n_s} P_{{\rm straight},n} \sum_{n=1}^{n_b}
P_{{\rm bend},n}
\stopformula
\placeformula
On 1 mars 09, at 19:53, Hans Hagen wrote:
Yue Wang wrote:
Oh, Hans, another bug report, pls test this (come from my thesis):
\usetypescript[palatino]
\setupbodyfont[palatino,rm]
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
P_{(i,j)}=\sum_{n=1}^{n_s} P_{{\rm straight},n} \sum_{n=1}^{n_b}
P_{{\rm bend
Otared Kavian wrote:
On 1 mars 09, at 19:53, Hans Hagen wrote:
Yue Wang wrote:
Oh, Hans, another bug report, pls test this (come from my thesis):
\usetypescript[palatino]
\setupbodyfont[palatino,rm]
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
P_{(i,j)}=\sum_{n=1}^{n_s} P_{{\rm straight},n} \sum_{n
yep. thx.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Yue Wang wrote:
Oh, Hans, another bug report, pls test this (come from my thesis):
\usetypescript[palatino]
\setupbodyfont[palatino,rm]
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
P_{(i,j)}=\sum_{n=1}^{n_s} P_{{\rm
[palatino,rm]
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
P_{(i,j)}=\sum_{n=1}^{n_s} P_{{\rm straight},n} \sum_{n=1}^{n_b}
P_{{\rm bend},n}
\stopformula
\placeformula\startformula
{{\rm d} {\bf y}\over {\rm d} t} = f(t,{\bf y}) \quad {\bf y}(0)={\bf k}
\stopformula
\stoptext
i have no clue what you
, pls test this (come from my thesis):
\usetypescript[palatino]
\setupbodyfont[palatino,rm]
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
P_{(i,j)}=\sum_{n=1}^{n_s} P_{{\rm straight},n} \sum_{n=1}^{n_b}
P_{{\rm bend},n}
\stopformula
\placeformula\startformula
{{\rm d} {\bf y}\over {\rm d} t} = f(t
Oh, Hans, another bug report, pls test this (come from my thesis):
\usetypescript[palatino]
\setupbodyfont[palatino,rm]
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
P_{(i,j)}=\sum_{n=1}^{n_s} P_{{\rm straight},n} \sum_{n=1}^{n_b}
P_{{\rm bend},n}
\stopformula
\placeformula\startformula
{{\rm d} {\bf y
. Below is an example.
Any ideas?
Thanks, Dave
\placeformula
\startformula \startalign
\NC \sigma_{L_s}^2
\NC= E\left\{ \eps_L^2 \right\} \NR
\NC \NC= \startmathlines
\NC E\left\{ \left( \frac{1}{L_{\ref}^2(\nu)}
\Re{\eps_{\pth}+\eps_{\off}}\,\cos\left(\phi(\nu)\right) +
\Im{\eps_{\pth
Hi, Hans
Using context=experimental, the following cross references all appear as ??
MKII works fine.
\placeformula \startformula \startalign
\NC v \NC = u + at \NR[eq:v]
\NC h \NC = ut + \frac12 gt^2 \NR[eq:h]
\stopalign \stopformula
Equation (\in[eq:v]) tells the final velocity after
time
appear as ??
MKII works fine.
\placeformula \startformula \startalign
\NC v \NC = u + at \NR[eq:v]
\NC h \NC = ut + \frac12 gt^2 \NR[eq:h]
\stopalign \stopformula
Equation (\in[eq:v]) tells the final velocity after
time $t$ and equation (\in[eq:h]) tells the distance
travelled in time $t$.
Yue
Is there any progress on this? I notice it is not yet in the core. I'm in
need of an AMSL split-like environment but the above doesn't work entirely
as expected. Below is an example.
Any ideas?
Thanks, Dave
\placeformula
\startformula \startalign
\NC \sigma_{L_s}^2
\NC= E\left\{ \eps_L
control sequence
(\currentformulassynchronize).
OK, in fact the whole file is just add \bye at the end of that piece of code.
This works well on both mkii and mkiv:
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula \startalign
\NC v \NC = u + at \NR[eq:v]
\NC h \NC = ut + \frac12 gt^2 \NR[eq:h]
\stopalign
ناب زیستن نتوانم
بی باده کشید بار تن نتوانم
\placeformula[Eq:eq1]$$x^2+2x$$
\stoppersiandocument
\stoptext
On 1/9/09, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Ilda Khaki wrote:
Is it possible to import functionalities of XePersian into ConTeXt.
Xepersian now is excellent in Persian typesetting
Hi,
this code
\setupformulas[location=left]
\placeformula \startformula
K = V + W(V) × S (Gleichung 1)
\stopformula
gives, as expected:
(1.1) K = V + W(V ) × S
But I need the following label (Gleichung means formula):
(Gleichung 1) K = V + W(V ) × S
How can this be done (in Mk II) ?
Thanks
Am 04.12.2008 um 12:46 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Hi,
this code
\setupformulas[location=left]
\placeformula \startformula
K = V + W(V) × S (Gleichung 1)
\stopformula
gives, as expected:
(1.1) K = V + W(V ) × S
But I need the following label (Gleichung means formula):
(Gleichung 1) K
Am 04.12.2008 um 14:28 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 04.12.2008 um 12:46 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Hi,
this code
\setupformulas[location=left]
\placeformula \startformula
K = V + W(V) × S (Gleichung 1)
\stopformula
gives, as expected:
(1.1) K = V + W(V ) × S
But I need
Am 04.12.2008 um 14:39 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Am 04.12.2008 um 14:28 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 04.12.2008 um 12:46 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Hi,
this code
\setupformulas[location=left]
\placeformula \startformula
K = V + W(V) × S (Gleichung 1)
\stopformula
gives, as expected
301 - 400 of 652 matches
Mail list logo
