### [NTG-context] Defining \qed (was: Bug with \wordright...)

ees that \placeformula \startformula a^2 + b^2 = c^2 \stopformula which is the Pythagoras theorem. \qed Another proof of Pythagors theorem is based on the figure below in which one sees that: \placeformula \startformula (a+b)^2 = c^2 + 2ab \quad \imply \quad a^2 + b^2 = c^2. \qed \stopformula \stoptext %%

### Re: [NTG-context] Referencing formulas doesn't work?

Schuster < wolfgang.schuster.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 05:58:50 +0800 > Jon Wong wrote: > > > MWE: > > > > \starttext > > > > The famous result (and again) is given by > > \placeformula[formulalabel] > > \startformula

### Re: [NTG-context] Referencing formulas doesn't work?

On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 05:58:50 +0800 Jon Wong wrote: > MWE: > > \starttext > > The famous result (and again) is given by > \placeformula[formulalabel] > \startformula > c^2 = a^2 + b^2. > \stopformula > And now we can refer to formula \ref[][formulalabel]. >

### [NTG-context] Referencing formulas doesn't work?

MWE: \starttext The famous result (and again) is given by \placeformula[formulalabel] \startformula c^2 = a^2 + b^2. \stopformula And now we can refer to formula \ref[][formulalabel]. \stoptext There is a blank where the formula label should be at “now we can refer to formula ---“. Regards

### [NTG-context] Some questions regarding math typesetting

://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/518262/context-number-formulas-side-by-side \placeformula \startformulas \startformula \startalign[number=auto] \NC a \NC= b \NR \stopalign \stopformula \startformula \startalign[number=auto] \NC a \NC= b \NR \stopalign \stopformula

### Re: [NTG-context] Referencing equation, missing dot

FILE \definereferenceformat[eqref][left=(,right=)] \starttext \chapter[title=Foo] \placeformula[eq:bar] \startformula 1+1=2 \stopformula We see in \eqref[eq:bar]. \stoptext fixed in next beta

### [NTG-context] Referencing equation, missing dot

=)] \starttext \chapter[title=Foo] \placeformula[eq:bar] \startformula 1+1=2 \stopformula We see in \eqref[eq:bar]. \stoptext ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist

### Re: [NTG-context] List of Symbols/Abbreviations/Glosses with more then two entries

ection[title=List of Tables] \placelistoftables \stopsection \startsection[title=List of Symbols] \placelistofsymbols \stopsection \stopfrontmatter \startbodymatter \startsection[title=Symbols] \startsubsection[title=Using the Symbols] \placeformula \startsubformulas \startformula \startalign \NC \frac{d

### Re: [NTG-context] Subformula numbering

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 8:40 AM adrien Licari wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I can't get cases subformula to work properly. My MWE, inspired from the > wiki and the My Way "Using \startalign and friends" by Aditya Mahajan, is : > > \starttext\placeformula\startformula >

### [NTG-context] Subformula numbering

Hi everyone, I can't get cases subformula to work properly. My MWE, inspired from the wiki and the My Way "Using \startalign and friends" by Aditya Mahajan, is : \starttext\placeformula\startformula \startcases \NC x = a \NR[+] \NC y = b \NR[+] \stopcases\stopformul

### [NTG-context] referencing is broken in version: 2018.08.15 18:45

With this example code from the wiki (slightly modified for use here): \setuppapersize[A5] \starttext \placeformula[eq:pythagoras] \startformula   a^2+b^2=c^2 \stopformula This is explained in \in{Equation}{.}[eq:pythagoras] \stoptext The following output is obtained

### Re: [NTG-context] referencing the equation

I usually define my own reference formats, “ineq” for equations, “infig” for figures: \definereferenceformat[ineq][left=(,right=)] \definereferenceformat[infig][left=\labeltext{figure}] \starttext \starttext \placeformula \startformula \startalign \NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[eq:1] \NC

### Re: [NTG-context] referencing the equation

Schuster > 작성: > > When you look at the first example in section 4.1 you can see that the > parentheses are inserted by hand. > > %% > \starttext > > \placeformula > \startformula \startalign > \NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[eq:1] > \NC a_

### Re: [NTG-context] referencing the equation

When you look at the first example in section 4.1 you can see that the parentheses are inserted by hand. %% \starttext \placeformula \startformula \startalign \NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[eq:1] \NC a_2 x + b_2 y \NC = c_2 \NR[eq:2] \stopalign \stopformula As seen from (\in[eq:1

### Re: [NTG-context] Word and character count excluding TeX-directives

[     location=bottom,     title={Residual plot with time $t$ on the x-axis and     residuals $e_{jt}$ on the y-axis},     reference={fig:subject-residual}] \externalfigure[residuals][height=.242\textheight] \stopplacefigure And some more text with $x$ and $y$ and $z$, and \placeformula \startformula

### [NTG-context] Word and character count excluding TeX-directives

and residuals $e_{jt}$ on the y-axis}, reference={fig:subject-residual}] \externalfigure[residuals][height=.242\textheight] \stopplacefigure And some more text with $x$ and $y$ and $z$, and \placeformula \startformula \startalign \NC a =\NC b \NR \NC c =\NC d \NR \stopalign \stopformula

### Re: [NTG-context] Arbitrary tag of displayed formula

r\star},{\star\star\star}] > \defineformula[star][numberconversion=myset] > > \starttext > \placeformula > \startstarformula > a^4 + b^4 = c^4. > \stopstarformula > > \placeformula > \startstarformula > a^5 + b^5 = c^5. > \stopstarformula > > \placeformula > \startsta

### Re: [NTG-context] Arbitrary tag of displayed formula

Hi Mikael, I learned the following from Aditya some time ago, on his website Random Determinism: maybe you can adapt it to your needs. \defineconversion[myset][\star,{\star\star},{\star\star\star}] \defineformula[star][numberconversion=myset] \starttext \placeformula \startstarformula a^4 + b

### Re: [NTG-context] mathmatrix vs substack

Dear Hans, Thanks for the patch.  It runs without errors again.  However, another problem surfaced.  In the MWE below the second column of the matrix is no longer centred as it should be. current version: 2017.09.08 17:24 Cheers, Henri --- \starttext \placeformula \startformula

### Re: [NTG-context] mathmatrix vs substack

--- \starttext \placeformula \startformula   \sum_{\startsubstack \NC k \NR \NC \omega_n \NR   \stopsubstack} \stopformula \placeformula \startformula   \startmathmatrix[left=\left|,right=\right|] \NC 0 \NC 1 \NR \NC 1 \NC 0 \NR   \stopmathmatrix   = -1 . \stopformula \stoptext

### [NTG-context] mathmatrix vs substack

Dear devs, Thank you very much for fixing this one https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2017/089790.html Unfortunately it seems like you broke substack and mathmatrix on the way.  MWE below fails with version 2017.09.08 17:24 Cheers, Henri --- \starttext \placeformula \startformula

### Re: [NTG-context] mathalignment vs mathmatrix

re detailed example where you see the problem? > > Best regards: OK > > > > > On 8 Sep 2017, at 06:51, Henri <henrime...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > \define\Up{\mathord\Uparrow} > > \define\Dn{\mathord\Downarrow} > > > > \starttext

### Re: [NTG-context] mathalignment vs mathmatrix

ver: 2017.09.05 15:10 MKIV beta). Can you please give a more detailed example where you see the problem? Best regards: OK > On 8 Sep 2017, at 06:51, Henri <henrime...@gmail.com> wrote: > > \define\Up{\mathord\Uparrow} > \define\Dn{\mathord\Downarrow} > > \star

### [NTG-context] mathalignment vs mathmatrix

} \define\Dn{\mathord\Downarrow} \starttext \placeformula \startformula   \startmathalignment \NC \psi_{+,\Up} ... \startmathmatrix \stopmathmatrix \NR \NC \psi_{+,\Dn} ... \NR   \stopmathalignment \stopformula \stoptext

### Re: [NTG-context] next beta

(or is that maybe included in the new mechanism)? Best Mathias > Am 12.06.2017 um 17:25 schrieb Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl>: > > Hi, > > experimental in next beta: > > \starttext > > test > > \startbuffer > \placeformula > \startformula >x\dorecu

### [NTG-context] next beta

Hi, experimental in next beta: \starttext test \startbuffer \placeformula \startformula x\dorecurse{100}{+#1x^{#1x}}=10 \stopformula test \startformula x\dorecurse{100}{+#1x^{#1x}}=10 \stopformula test \stopbuffer \par \setupformula[split=no] \getbuffer \par \par \setupformula

### Re: [NTG-context] Strange interaction between mathalignment and mathmatrix

On 6/6/2017 1:06 AM, Henri Menke wrote: It seems that \NC in mathalignment is looking ahead for the next \NR, because when I wrap the matrix in an explicit brace group it works fine again: \definemathmatrix [pmatrix] [left=\left(,right=\right)] \starttext \placeformula \startformula

### Re: [NTG-context] Strange interaction between mathalignment and mathmatrix

On 6/6/2017 1:06 AM, Henri Menke wrote: It seems that \NC in mathalignment is looking ahead for the next \NR, because when I wrap the matrix in an explicit brace group it works fine again: \definemathmatrix [pmatrix] [left=\left(,right=\right)] \starttext \placeformula \startformula

### Re: [NTG-context] Strange interaction between mathalignment and mathmatrix

Wow, mathalignment is completely screwed in beta and TL2017.  Hans, please fix! --- \starttext \placeformula \startformula   \startmathalignment[m=2] \NC a^2 + b^2 \NC= c^2 \NC a^2 + b^2 \NC= c^2 \NR   \stopmathalignment \stopformula \stoptext On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 11:06 +1200, Henri

### Re: [NTG-context] Strange interaction between mathalignment and mathmatrix

It seems that \NC in mathalignment is looking ahead for the next \NR, because when I wrap the matrix in an explicit brace group it works fine again: \definemathmatrix   [pmatrix]   [left=\left(,right=\right)] \starttext \placeformula \startformula   \startmathalignment \NC \sigma_x \NC

### Re: [NTG-context] Formula numbers in RTL mode

sion, I want to bring attention to this > issue once again, in the hope of getting it resolved. > > Formula numbers are not placed at the far end when in RTL. Here is a MWE: > > > \starttext > > \input knuth > > \placeformula > \startformula > E = mc^2. > \stopfo

### [NTG-context] Formula numbers in RTL mode

numbers are not placed at the far end when in RTL. Here is a MWE: \starttext \input knuth \placeformula \startformula E = mc^2. \stopformula \righttoleft \placeformula \startformula E = mc^2. \stopformula \stoptext Attached is the result from context version 2017.05.14 19:09. Using

### Re: [NTG-context] eqalignno failin

I had this code: 99 \placeformula\startformula 100 \eqalignno{ 101 >> H(I,J) &= H(I) + H(J|I)\qquad&\hbox{\ineq[eq:equivoc]}\cr 102 W(I,J) &= H(J) - H(J|I)\qquad&\hbox{\ineq[eq:wedinfo]}\cr 103 } 104 \stopformula On 26 Apr 2017, at 16:38, Otared Kav

### Re: [NTG-context] eqalignno failing

Hi Hans, Since a few weeks (or months?…) ago the use of \eqno and \eqalignno has been changed in mkiv. It is better to use the construction such as: \placeformula \startformula \startalign \NC H(I,J) \NC = H(I) + H(J|I) \NR[eq:equivoc] \NC W(I,J) \NC = H(J) - H(J|I) \NR[eq:wedinfo] \stopalign

### [NTG-context] eqalignno failing

This code now fails where before contextbeta had no problems: tex error > tex error on line 101 in file Info/waarneming.tex: ! Misplaced alignment tab character & & l.101 H(I,J) & = H(I) + H(J|I)\qquad&\hbox{\ineq[eq:equivoc]}\cr 99 \placeformu

### Re: [NTG-context] Problem loading a DLL with the latest Ctx beta

rttext \placeformula \startformula j_1(2.387) = \startluacode local ffi = require("ffi") ffi.cdef[[ double _j1(double x); ]] tex.print(ffi.C._j1(2.387)) \stopluacode \stopformula \stoptext Best, Akira ___

### Re: [NTG-context] Problem loading a DLL with the latest Ctx beta

ll try it in the upcoming week. Thank you. Best regards, Lukas I hope that you can again load your lua DLL modules in a few days. Further, standard C functions can be used in ffi without loading a C DLL. For example, my previous example can be changed as follows: % % context test.tex % \starttext \placef

DLL. For example, my previous example can be changed as follows: % % context test.tex % \starttext \placeformula \startformula j_1(2.387) = \startluacode local ffi = require("ffi") ffi.cdef[[ double _j1(double x); ]] tex.print(ffi.C._j1(2.387)) \stopluacode \stopformula \stoptext B

ith context test.tex. % % context test.tex % \starttext \placeformula \startformula j_1(2.387) = \startluacode local ffi = require("ffi") ffi.cdef[[ double _j1(double x); ]] local mscrt = ffi.load("msvcrt") tex.print(mscrt._j1(2.387)) \stopluacode \stopformula \stoptext

### Re: [NTG-context] Formula numbering conversion

\defineconversion[dummyconversion][\dummyconversion] >> \setupformulas[conversion=dummyconversion] >> \placeformula[#1]} >> >> \starttext >> \placeformulatag[tag]{test} \startformula >>E = mc^2 >> \stopformula >> See \in formu

### Re: [NTG-context] Formula numbering conversion

ula] > \def\dummyconversion##1{#2} > \defineconversion[dummyconversion][\dummyconversion] > \setupformulas[conversion=dummyconversion] > \placeformula[#1]} > > \starttext > \placeformulatag[tag]{test} \startformula >E = mc^2 > \s

### Re: [NTG-context] Formula numbering conversion

merals for the equations. > > [...] > > Is this a bug ? Is it the correct way to change the numbering ? > > Hi Antoine, > > it’s numberconversion (as it reads in “ConTeXt Commands”): > > \setupformulas[numberconversion=greek] > \setupbodyfont[dejavu] > \star

### Re: [NTG-context] Formula numbering conversion

erconversion (as it reads in “ConTeXt Commands”): \setupformulas[numberconversion=greek] \setupbodyfont[dejavu] \starttext \placeformula[test] \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula \stoptext BTW, if this is wrong documented in the wiki, please correct it for future reference. Pa

### [NTG-context] Formula numbering conversion

The following code is documented to change the numbering of the equations. However, this still use numerals for the equations. \setupformulas[conversion=characters] \starttext \placeformula[test] \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula \stoptext Is this a bug ? Is it the correct way to change

### Re: [NTG-context] Chemical reaction...

t under the formula but as > text next to it. > > \starttext > \placeformula > \startformula > \chemical{(C_2H_5)_2Zn}{DEZ} > \chemical{PLUS} > % \chemical{2H^\oplus} {waterstof (zuur)} > \chemical{GIVES} > \chemical{Zn^{2\oplus}}{zi

### [NTG-context] Chemical reaction...

is, that the {DEZ} does not appear. Further the {zinkion} and {ethan} appear not as text under the formula but as text next to it. \starttext \placeformula \startformula \chemical{(C_2H_5)_2Zn}{DEZ} \chemical{PLUS} % \chemical{2H^\oplus} {waterstof (zuur)} \chemical{GIVES} \chemical

### [NTG-context] Side effect of leftmargin for formulas on \inright

] \starttext \inright{Text} Text \inright{0em} \placeformula[-]\startformula a^2+b^2=c^2 \stopformula \setupformulas[leftmargin=2em] \inright{2em} \placeformula[-]\startformula a^2+b^2=c^2 \stopformula \setupformulas[leftmargin=4em] \inright{4em} \placeformula[-]\startformula a^2+b^2=c^2

### [NTG-context] text–formula separation inside a frame

, and/or (even better) a possible fix? Thanks a lot! Florian MWE: \defineframed[Framed][width=\textwidth, height=5cm, align=normal] \starttext This formula is preceded by normal spacing: \placeformula[-]\startformula 1+1=2 \stopformula \Framed{ This formula somehow is preceded by too much spacing

### [NTG-context] text–formula separation inside a frame

=\textwidth, height=5cm, align=normal] \starttext This formula is preceded by normal spacing: \placeformula[-]\startformula 1+1=2 \stopformula \Framed{ This formula somehow is preceded by too much spacing: \placeformula[-]\startformula 1+1=2 \stopformula } \stoptext signature.asc Description: Message

### Re: [NTG-context] Problem with \leqalignno

Hi Mingranina, For displayed aligned formulas it is better to use \startalign…\stopalign, instead of the plain TeX construction \leqalignno. Please have a look at the following: Best regards: OK %%% begin align-equations.tex \starttext \placeformula \startformula \startalign \NC c^2 \NC= a^2

### Re: [NTG-context] Problem with \leqalignno

On Sun, 11 Sep 2016, Mingranina Gingranina wrote: Hello All, I am trying to compile the following example (from http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math/Display) with context: \starttext \placeformula \startformula \leqalignno{c^2 &= a^2 + b^2 &\formulanumber{a} \cr a^2 + b^

### [NTG-context] Problem with \leqalignno

Hello All, I am trying to compile the following example (from http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math/Display) with context: \starttext \placeformula \startformula \leqalignno{c^2 &= a^2 + b^2 &\formulanumber{a} \cr a^2 + b^2 &= c^2 &\subformulanumber{b} \cr

### Re: [NTG-context] Placement of numbers in numbered equations on the left

[location=right]} one gets: \placeformula \startformula \startalign \NC \exp(t_1)\exp(t_2)\NC = x_1x_2=\exp(\log(x_1x_2))\NR[eq:explag0] \NC \NC =\exp(\log x_1+\log x_2) = \exp(t_1+t_2).\NR[eq:explag1] \stopalign \stopformula \placeformula \startformula 1+1=2 \stopformula \setupformulas[location

### [NTG-context] Placement of numbers in numbered equations on the left

of numbers in equations numbered in an aligned environment and those which are by themselves. Please have a look at the attached PDF which is the result of the following example (using ConTeXt ver: 2016.09.06 19:11 MKIV beta). Best regards: OK %%% begin math-align.tex \starttext \placeformula

### Re: [NTG-context] Bug in \placeformula

Hi Henri, Your are right there is an issue with \startmathcases…\stopmathcases: the equations are not numbered when using this structure. As a temporary solution you can use \startmatrix…\stopmatrix as in the following, or you can define your own \startalignedcases. \starttext \placeformula

### [NTG-context] Bug in \placeformula

Dear list, this formula is not numbered even though it should be. Please fix. \starttext \placeformula \startformula \startmathcases \NC 0 \NC $\mu > 2t$ \NR \NC \pi/2 \NC $\mu = 2t$ \NR \NC \pi \NC $\mu < 2t$ \NR \stopmathcases \stopformula \stoptext Cheers,

### Re: [NTG-context] \startalign \stopalign equation number placement seems wrong

P. Sundqvist <mic...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> The test file >> >> \starttext >> \placeformula >> \startformula >> \startalign >> \NC \exp(t_1)\exp(t_2)\NC =x_1x_2=\exp(\ln(x_1x_2))\NR >> \NC \NC =\exp(\ln x_1+\ln x_2)=\

### Re: [NTG-context] \startalign \stopalign equation number placement seems wrong

with startalign, and it seemed to me that Hans fixed it. But it appeared again with the beta 2016.08.11 13:56. Best regards: OK > On 17 Aug 2016, at 14:20, Mikael P. Sundqvist <mic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > The test file > > \starttext > \placeformula > \startfor

### [NTG-context] \startalign \stopalign equation number placement seems wrong

Hi, The test file \starttext \placeformula \startformula \startalign \NC \exp(t_1)\exp(t_2)\NC =x_1x_2=\exp(\ln(x_1x_2))\NR \NC \NC =\exp(\ln x_1+\ln x_2)=\exp(t_1+t_2).\NR[eq:explag1] \stopalign \stopformula \placeformula \startformula 1+1=2 \stopformula \stoptext gives the attached pdf

### Re: [NTG-context] Wrap figures and equations

Hi Hans, I was going to report a similar issue with \placeformula and floats in general, as in the example below. However the trick suggested by Wolfgang does not solve all the problems and in fact in my real size document it triggers an error message saying

### Re: [NTG-context] Bug in placeformula with framed text

Hi Hans, Thanks a lot for having fixed the issue I was reporting. Unfortunately I found another issue related to placeformula and alignment in math mode. In the following example the use of \startalign in a \placeformula triggers a weird behavior in the sense that the following instance

### Re: [NTG-context] Bug in placeformula with framed text

On 7/4/2016 11:11 AM, Otared Kavian wrote: Below is an example (sorry if it is not absolutely minimal: I ran into this bug when updating a lecture notes which uses a left frame around \proclaim stuff). I attach the PDF showing the problem. I wonder whether this is related to the new features

### [NTG-context] Bug in placeformula with framed text

Hi Hans, It seems that there is a bug in the latest beta (ConTeXt vesion: 2016.07.01 16:28) when using \placeformula with a framed text environment. The numbers for the formulas are placed incorrectly, on the left as well as on the right. Also, as one may see in the example below the numbering

### [NTG-context] Fonts inside eqno{}

expression \placeformula \startformula y = Z \beta_1 + Y \beta_2 + u \stopformula that changes to % \placeformula \startformula y = Z \beta_1 + Y \beta_2 + W_1\tau + u \eqno{ (1')} \stopformula \stoptext ​%%​ ​I would like the (1') ​keep the same kind of font than (1). Any

### Re: [NTG-context] Vim snippets

') || finish endif let st = g:snip_start_tag let et = g:snip_end_tag let cd = g:snip_elem_delim let bt = st.et let si = IMAP_GetPlaceHolderStart() let ei = IMAP_GetPlaceHolderEnd() exec "Snippet for \\startformula".st.et."\\stopformula".si.ei exec "Snippet pfor \\p

] \setuphead[section][number=no] \starttext \chapter{foo} \placeformula \startformula E=mc^2 \stopformula \section{bar} \placeformula \startformula a^2+b^2=c^2 \stopformula \stoptext The second formula has only the formula number 2. I would expect the formula number 1.2 (or at least I would

### Re: [NTG-context] Formula numbering

Mari Voipio <mailto:mari.voi...@iki.fi> 8. September 2015 13:40 Hello! I recently had to reformat a document that contains mathematical notation and I was surprised how easy it was once I got the hang of it. There's only one tiny problem: I have one equation inserted with \placef

### [NTG-context] Formula numbering

Hello! I recently had to reformat a document that contains mathematical notation and I was surprised how easy it was once I got the hang of it. There's only one tiny problem: I have one equation inserted with \placeformula. Currently this formula gets numbered as equation 2.1 as it is in chapter

### Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

-formulas by invoking (\in[mylabel]), but if one wishes to refer to any individual sub-formula one has to give a label inside the structure \start—\stop—subformulas, at the level of \placeformula for that sub-formula. Below is your example, with these remarks. Thanks for your attention and help: OK

### Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

\c_strc_formulas_inside_formulas_sub + \the\everyresetformulas % to be checked \dorechecknextindentation} % here ? begin example \usemodule[visual] \starttext \placeformula \startformula \fakeformula \stopformula %\startsubformulas[+] % These two options for \subformulas

### Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

{Cha1} \section{A} \placeformula\startformula\fakeformula\stopformula \section{B} \placeformula\startformula\fakeformula\stopformula \subsection{Ba} \placeformula\startformula\fakeformula\stopformula \stoptext gives numbers in form of (1.1), (1.2

### Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

, prefixsegments=part, way=bysection, %way=bytext, %location=right, ] \def\fakeformula{a^2 + b^2 = c^2} \starttext \part{P1} \chapter{Cha1} \section{A} \placeformula\startformula\fakeformula\stopformula % 1.1 | 1.1 be part 1, formula #1 in the part \section{B

### Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

} % here ? begin example \usemodule[visual] \starttext \placeformula \startformula \fakeformula \stopformula %\startsubformulas[+] % These two options for \subformulas %\startsubformulas[mylabel] % enable subnumbers for the formulas \startsubformulas \placeformula \startformula

### Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

] \placeformula \startformula \startalign \NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[eq:11] \NC a_2 x + b_2 y \NC = c_2 \NR[eq:12] \stopalign \stopformula \stopsubformulas \in{eq:11}[eq:11] \in{eq:12}[eq:12] \placeformula

### [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas broken?

Hello, the following example (based on http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math/Display#Automatic_Sub-Formula_Numbering ): \starttext \startsubformulas[eq:1] \placeformula[eq:1a] \startformula c^2 = a^2 + b^2 \stopformula \placeformula[eq:1b] \startformula

### [NTG-context] Math alignment

. %\def\equlb#1{\left\{ \startalign #1 \stopalign\right.} %\def\equlb#1{\left\{ \startmathalignment #1 \stopmathalignment\right.} \startformula \placeformula[JcoordDef] J^j:\equlb{ω^0 → 0 \cr ω^j → 0} \quad \equlb{ω^k → ω^l \cr ω^l → -ω^k} \stopformula \stoptext

### Re: [NTG-context] Weird position of equation numbers for long equations

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 7:07 PM, luigi scarso wrote: a patch is available in trunk, rev. 5244 (not in TeXLive 2015) . Thank you, but something seems wrong. \starttext \hsize=2cm \dorecurse{10}{hi } $$a\eqno(a)$$ \placeformula \startformula a \stopformula a^2+b^2=c^2\eqno(b

### [NTG-context] Weird position of equation numbers for long equations

problematic example: \starttext \placeformula \startformula \dorecurse{28}{a+} \stopformula \stoptext Thank you, Mojca ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg

### Re: [NTG-context] Weird position of equation numbers for long equations

that this positioning on the left is intentional: is there any way or setting to force the equation number to be moved to the right? This is a bug in luatex: http://tracker.luatex.org/view.php?id=807 Aditya isn't the the formula simply too long ? \starttext \placeformula \startformula 0

### [NTG-context] Changing coversion of formulas

Hi, How does one change the numberconversion for math formulas? The old method: \setupformulas[numberconversion=set 1] \starttext \placeformula \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula \stoptext does not appear to work. Thanks, Aditya

### Re: [NTG-context] Changing coversion of formulas

On 4/27/2015 11:24 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: Hi, How does one change the numberconversion for math formulas? The old method: \setupformulas[numberconversion=set 1] \starttext \placeformula \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula \stoptext does not appear to work. \setupcounter[formula

### Re: [NTG-context] Changing coversion of formulas

On Mon, 27 Apr 2015, Hans Hagen wrote: On 4/27/2015 11:24 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: Hi, How does one change the numberconversion for math formulas? The old method: \setupformulas[numberconversion=set 1] \starttext \placeformula \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula \stoptext does

### Re: [NTG-context] Changing coversion of formulas

\placeformula \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula \stoptext does not appear to work. \setupcounter[formula][numberconversion=set 1] Using characters as numberconversion works, but set 1 does not. Your original example with \setupformulas[numberconversion=set 1] works for me

### Re: [NTG-context] Changing coversion of formulas

[numberconversion=set 1] \starttext \placeformula \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula \stoptext does not appear to work. \setupcounter[formula][numberconversion=set 1] Using characters as numberconversion works, but set 1 does not. Your original example with \setupformulas

### Re: [NTG-context] Changing coversion of formulas

for math formulas? The old method: \setupformulas[numberconversion=set 1] \starttext \placeformula \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula \stoptext does not appear to work. \setupcounter[formula][numberconversion=set 1] Using characters as numberconversion works, but set 1 does not. Your

### [NTG-context] misalignment of equation numbers

in this example: \starttext bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla \placeformula \startformula K_1 \rightarrow E(f) = \frac {K_1(f)} { f}\,. \stopformula \placeformula \startformula K_1 \rightarrow \startmathcases \NC

### [NTG-context] Subformula numbering problem

No. Wolfgang This used to work, how is it possible that it does not work anymore? \starttext \startsubformulas[eq:equation] \placeformula[eq:first] \startformula c^2 = a^2 + b^2 \stopformula \placeformula[eq:second] \startformula c^2 = a^2 + b^2 \stopformula \stopsubformulas

### [NTG-context] Subformula numbering problem

The second formula has NO NUMBER (example taken from the ConTeXt Garden's Math/Display page): \starttext \startsubformulas[eq:1] \placeformula[eq:first] \startformula c^2 = a^2 + b^2 \stopformula \placeformula[eq:second] \startformula c^2 = a^2 + b^2 \stopformula \stopsubformulas Formula