On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Bruce D'Arcus bdarcus.li...@gmail.comwrote:
John Haltiwanger john.haltiwanger at gmail.com writes:
[...]
Markdown with RDFa on the side will suit quite nicely, thanks to pandoc.
Actually, you can embed the RDFa within the markdown files if you like.
div
In any case, I'd worry less about the technology, and more about what you
need
from it. That will make it easier to figure out which approach is best.
Bruce
Markdown with RDFa on the side will suit quite nicely, thanks to pandoc. The
desire for semantical documents sounds like it will be
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:26 PM, John Haltiwanger
john.haltiwan...@gmail.com wrote:
In any case, I'd worry less about the technology, and more about what you
need
from it. That will make it easier to figure out which approach is best.
Bruce
Markdown with RDFa on the side will suit
Am 25.05.2009 um 22:25 schrieb Mohamed Bana:
i tend to write in Markdown, as the syntax is very light weight,
then compile with pandoc (http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/).
$ pandoc --toc --smart --number-sections --standalone -H header.tex -
w context file.pdc -o file.tex
$ texexec
John Haltiwanger john.haltiwanger at gmail.com writes:
[...]
Markdown with RDFa on the side will suit quite nicely, thanks to pandoc.
Actually, you can embed the RDFa within the markdown files if you like.
div property=x:section
# Introduction
Test.
/div
Pandoc will just pass it on to
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm hra...@fiee.netwrote:
Am 2009-05-24 um 19:17 schrieb John Haltiwanger:
1) Can environment files be used across documents, or is it generally
understood that every ConTeXt document requires its own environment
formatting? (The latter is
John Haltiwanger wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm hra...@fiee.netwrote:
Am 2009-05-24 um 19:17 schrieb John Haltiwanger:
1) Can environment files be used across documents, or is it generally
understood that every ConTeXt document requires its own environment
Am 25.05.2009 um 18:30 schrieb John Haltiwanger:
I am not averse to rolling my own, I am just confused why, if
environments
are so powerful and flexible (flexible meaning one can easily change
things,
unlike document classes), there are no pre-rolled environments
available. I
am thinking
I am not averse to rolling my own, I am just confused why, if environments
are so powerful and flexible (flexible meaning one can easily change
things,
unlike document classes), there are no pre-rolled environments available.
I
am thinking here of standardized thesis environments for
John Haltiwanger wrote:
Okay, but that does imply that an organization can set up an environment and
expect its members to use it.
indeed, of seek help in doing so (not much different from setting up a
housestyle for word ro whatever)
I'm not sure what you mean by a representation of a
my personal favourite
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context/44368/focus=46254, beware
you might have trouble getting that to compile with a new version of LuaTeX.
John Haltiwanger wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com
These paragraphs seems to contradict. ConTeXt is useful if you use an
environment more than once, but there are no ready-to-use ConTeXt
environments.
You're probably confused by the term environment. It means
something very specific in ConTeXt, see for example section 2.3 of
John Haltiwanger wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 25.05.2009 um 18:30 schrieb John Haltiwanger:
I am not averse to rolling my own, I am just confused why, if environments
are so powerful and flexible (flexible meaning one
Since Arthur implies that an XML output might one day be
feasible,
Note that the final estimate for the stable release of LuaTeX is 2012,
but the backend features may be available sooner. Many people are looking
forward to using LuaTeX for producing XML-based and other formats
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Arthur Reutenauer
arthur.reutena...@normalesup.org wrote:
Since Arthur implies that an XML output might one day be
feasible,
Note that the final estimate for the stable release of LuaTeX is 2012,
but the backend features may be available
Nice, glad to hear it. Also of interest are new semantic tagging facilities
for PDF in the newest proposal for ISO 32000, mentioned by an Adobe engineer
in the comments of this blog entry
http://digitalcuration.blogspot.com/2009/04/semantically-richer-pdf.html
If you mean Leonard
Yes, that is the comment. Thank you for the heads up :)
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Arthur Reutenauer
arthur.reutena...@normalesup.org wrote:
Nice, glad to hear it. Also of interest are new semantic tagging
facilities
for PDF in the newest proposal for ISO 32000, mentioned by an Adobe
On Mon, 25 May 2009, John Haltiwanger wrote:
unlike document classes), there are no pre-rolled environments available. I
am thinking here of standardized thesis environments for universities, or a
There are no standardized thesis styles for universities mainly because
there are no consistent
Thank you Aditya. All that makes sense to me. It is quite clear from
everyone's responses that the person on c.t.t who claimed ConTeXt is only
for one-offs was not correct.
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2009, John Haltiwanger wrote:
John Haltiwanger wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Arthur Reutenauer
arthur.reutena...@normalesup.org wrote:
Since Arthur implies that an XML output might one day be
feasible,
Note that the final estimate for the stable release of LuaTeX is 2012,
but the backend
i tend to write in Markdown, as the syntax is very light weight, then
compile with pandoc (http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/).
$ pandoc --toc --smart --number-sections --standalone -H header.tex -w
context file.pdc -o file.tex
$ texexec file.tex
i think Aditya has some documents floating
Wow, that is handy! Thanks for the tip Modamed.
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Mohamed Bana mbana.li...@googlemail.comwrote:
i tend to write in Markdown, as the syntax is very light weight, then
compile with pandoc (http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/).
$ pandoc --toc --smart
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
John Haltiwanger wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Arthur Reutenauer
arthur.reutena...@normalesup.org wrote:
Since Arthur implies that an XML output might one day be
feasible,
Note that the final
luigi scarso wrote:
well , if you give us some hints maybe
someone will present an article at next context meeting ...
(1) wait for the rewritten backend (next year)
(2) wait till structure in mkiv is stable
but indeed we can discuss these things at the upcoming context meeting
Hans
well , if you give us some hints maybe
someone will present an article at next context meeting ...
If you're interested in Tagged PDF, you should really look into what
the River Valley guys are doing on the mailing-list I mentioned, and
contact Ross Moore, Han The Thanh, etc.
Hello,
My name is John and I'm a nearly brand new TeX convert. All it took was one
letter I wanted to look nice and now I know I will never craft an important
document in another format again.
Now, an obvious entry point is LaTeX, and indeed my first TeX document used
this macro package.
Am 2009-05-24 um 19:17 schrieb John Haltiwanger:
1) Can environment files be used across documents, or is it
generally understood that every ConTeXt document requires its own
environment formatting? (The latter is the view of someone on c.t.t,
who said his perception of ConTeXt was that it
27 matches
Mail list logo
