On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 1/16/2017 11:27 PM, Jeong Dal wrote:
>
>> If I remove either “%” or the formula, then the output looks fine.
>
>
> indeed, some subtle end-par-too-late-then-and-grouping issue
>
> Hans
>
> -
On 1/16/2017 11:27 PM, Jeong Dal wrote:
If I remove either “%” or the formula, then the output looks fine.
indeed, some subtle end-par-too-late-then-and-grouping issue
Hans
-
Hans Hagen
Dear Mikael,
I didn’t see any problem which you mentioned when I run it under the ConTeXt
version 2016.10. 6 MKIV beta.
But I saw a change the vertical space when I run it under ConTeXt version 2016.
12. 28 MKIV beta after updated the bata.
I tested in several ways and found that the vertical
On 1/16/2017 12:56 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Mikael,
Thanks for making it clear to me: I was looking for the changes in vertical
spacing around the formula… Now it is clear that there is a bug in the vertical
spacing: when I typeset your example with mkii or mkiv ConTeXt Version
2016.05.17
Hi Mikael,
Thanks for making it clear to me: I was looking for the changes in vertical
spacing around the formula… Now it is clear that there is a bug in the vertical
spacing: when I typeset your example with mkii or mkiv ConTeXt Version
2016.05.17 from TeXLive, the issue is not present, as one
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
> Hi Mikael,
>
> To make sure we are talking about the same issue, here are the outputs
> obtained with and without blank lines around \startformula…\stopformula: Can
> you please send me too your outputs so I can compare with mines?
>
> Bes
Hi Mikael,
To make sure we are talking about the same issue, here are the outputs obtained
with and without blank lines around \startformula…\stopformula: Can you please
send me too your outputs so I can compare with mines?
Best regards: OK
formula-vertical-distance-with.pdf
Description: Adob
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 1:00 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
>> Hi Mikael,
>>
>> I tested your example but I see no difference in the outputs, with, or
>> without a blank line between the text and the displayed formula.
>> I am using ConteXt
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 1:00 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
> Hi Mikael,
>
> I tested your example but I see no difference in the outputs, with, or
> without a blank line between the text and the displayed formula.
> I am using ConteXt 2016.12.28 17:55 MKIV beta.
>
> Best regards: OK
>
>> On 13 Jan 201
Hi Mikael,
I tested your example but I see no difference in the outputs, with, or without
a blank line between the text and the displayed formula.
I am using ConteXt 2016.12.28 17:55 MKIV beta.
Best regards: OK
> On 13 Jan 2017, at 14:13, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
>
> Dear list,
>
> please
Dear list,
please have a look at the output (ctx-example13.pdf) of the somewhat
ugly example below. The vertical space before the paragraph with the
displayed formula is almost none. If I remove the % signs before and
after the formula, the space before the paragraph looks ok.
Do I have to enter
11 matches
Mail list logo
