Re: [NTG-context] Problems with mathalign

2007-02-19 Thread Wim Neimeijer

Aditya Mahajan wrote:

\startbuffer
\placeformula
\startformula
\startalign[m=2,distance=3cm]
  \NC a \NC =b
  \NC A \NC =B \NR[+]
  \NC c \NC =d
  \NC C \NC =D \NR[+]
\stopalign
\stopformula
\stopbuffer
\typebuffer
\getbuffer



I can confirm that there is an extra number. I do not know what is 
causing this. I am not aware of anything in core-mat has changed.


I compiled My Way on mathalign, and everything has an extra number. 
hmm...
  

Does a solution or fix exists  for this problem ?
The problem still exists in ConTeXt  ver: 2007.01.02 13:44 MK II  fmt: 
2007.2.3  int: english/english.


I don't want to complain but in general this is really worrying, changes 
to core functionality

which worked in the past, it seems it suddenly stops working.

I saw Taco made a comment on the 3nd of January 2007 , quoting
''There is that extra stuff in \everymathematics. Could that be it?''
but unfortunately he did not provide a solution.

Regards

Wim Neimeijer
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] Problems with mathalign

2007-02-19 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Wim Neimeijer wrote:

 Aditya Mahajan wrote:
 \startbuffer
 \placeformula
 \startformula
 \startalign[m=2,distance=3cm]
   \NC a \NC =b
   \NC A \NC =B \NR[+]
   \NC c \NC =d
   \NC C \NC =D \NR[+]
 \stopalign
 \stopformula
 \stopbuffer
 \typebuffer
 \getbuffer
 
 
 I can confirm that there is an extra number. I do not know what is causing 
 this. I am not aware of anything in core-mat has changed.
 
 I compiled My Way on mathalign, and everything has an extra number. hmm...
 
 Does a solution or fix exists  for this problem ?
 The problem still exists in ConTeXt  ver: 2007.01.02 13:44 MK II  fmt: 
 2007.2.3  int: english/english.

It was fixed immediately. Update ConTeXt to either the latest stable 
version or the latest beta version.

 I don't want to complain but in general this is really worrying, changes to 
 core functionality
 which worked in the past, it seems it suddenly stops working.

There is a ConTeXt tests projects to provide regression testing. 
However, it will take some time before it can be automated. Also, if 
something in the core functionality breaks down, and is reported on 
the list, Hans or Taco provide the solution almost immediately (well, 
at most in a day or two). So, if there is a new ConTeXt beta after you 
report a bug, the beta will contain a fix.

 I saw Taco made a comment on the 3nd of January 2007 , quoting
 ''There is that extra stuff in \everymathematics. Could that be it?''
 but unfortunately he did not provide a solution.

Taco continued on the dev-context list and provided the solution. See 
http://archive.contextgarden.net/thread/20070105.080939.8ef11c87.en.html

Aditya
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


[NTG-context] Problems with mathalign

2007-01-03 Thread Mojca Miklavec
Hello,

I wanted to keep Aditya busy now that he finished his wonderful new
module ;), so ...


I first wanted to ask how to number subformulas in a certain way, but
that I figured out that numbering is already causing some problems on
its own.


Consider the following examples:

\starttext

This is almost OK, but has one formula number too much here:

\startbuffer
\placeformula
\startformula
\startalign[m=2,distance=3cm]
  a  =b
 A  =B \\
  c  =d
 C  =D \\
\stopalign
\stopformula
\stopbuffer
\typebuffer
\getbuffer

This results in a very weird formula numbering

\startbuffer
\placeformula
\startformula
\startalign[m=2,distance=3cm]
\NC a \NC =b
\NC A \NC =B \NR
\NC c \NC =d
\NC C \NC =D \NR
\stopalign
\stopformula
\stopbuffer
\typebuffer
\getbuffer

Adding [+] helps, but than we have the same problem as at the beginning:

\startbuffer
\placeformula
\startformula
\startalign[m=2,distance=3cm]
\NC a \NC =b
\NC A \NC =B \NR[+]
\NC c \NC =d
\NC C \NC =D \NR[+]
\stopalign
\stopformula
\stopbuffer
\typebuffer
\getbuffer

Without placeforumla, but with [+] we don't get any numbering at all:

\startbuffer
\startformula
\startalign[m=2,distance=3cm]
\NC a \NC =b
\NC A \NC =B \NR[+]
\NC c \NC =d
\NC C \NC =D \NR[+]
\stopalign
\stopformula
\stopbuffer
\typebuffer
\getbuffer

\stoptext

CtxTools | context version: 2006.12.27 11:34
(After running ctxtools --update I just managed to break everything.)

Any clue?

Thanks,
Mojca
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] Problems with mathalign

2007-01-03 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

 Hello,
 
 I wanted to keep Aditya busy now that he finished his wonderful new
 module ;), so ...
 
 
 I first wanted to ask how to number subformulas in a certain way, but
 that I figured out that numbering is already causing some problems on
 its own.
 
 
 Consider the following examples:
 
 \starttext
 
 This is almost OK, but has one formula number too much here:
 
 \startbuffer
 \placeformula
 \startformula
 \startalign[m=2,distance=3cm]
 a  =b
A  =B \\
 c  =d
C  =D \\
 \stopalign
 \stopformula
 \stopbuffer
 \typebuffer
 \getbuffer

Do not use the latex syntax.

 This results in a very weird formula numbering

Something is broken. AFAIK, this should not give you any number.

 \startbuffer
 \placeformula
 \startformula
 \startalign[m=2,distance=3cm]
   \NC a \NC =b
   \NC A \NC =B \NR
   \NC c \NC =d
   \NC C \NC =D \NR
 \stopalign
 \stopformula
 \stopbuffer
 \typebuffer
 \getbuffer
 
 Adding [+] helps, but than we have the same problem as at the beginning:

Adding [+] is necessary.

 \startbuffer
 \placeformula
 \startformula
 \startalign[m=2,distance=3cm]
   \NC a \NC =b
   \NC A \NC =B \NR[+]
   \NC c \NC =d
   \NC C \NC =D \NR[+]
 \stopalign
 \stopformula
 \stopbuffer
 \typebuffer
 \getbuffer

I can confirm that there is an extra number. I do not know what is 
causing this. I am not aware of anything in core-mat has changed.

I compiled My Way on mathalign, and everything has an extra number. 
hmm...

 Without placeforumla, but with [+] we don't get any numbering at all:

Yes you need the placefurmula.

 
 \startbuffer
 \startformula
 \startalign[m=2,distance=3cm]
   \NC a \NC =b
   \NC A \NC =B \NR[+]
   \NC c \NC =d
   \NC C \NC =D \NR[+]
 \stopalign
 \stopformula
 \stopbuffer
 \typebuffer
 \getbuffer
 
 \stoptext
 
 CtxTools | context version: 2006.12.27 11:34
 (After running ctxtools --update I just managed to break everything.)
 
 Any clue?

Something is broken.

Aditya
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] Problems with mathalign

2007-01-03 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
 
 
 I can confirm that there is an extra number. I do not know what is 
 causing this. I am not aware of anything in core-mat has changed.

There is that extra stuff in \everymathematics.  Could that be it?

Taco
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context