Hi,
[language and hyphenation issues]
> [i can imagine that taco/patrick work out something for the
> mirror/wiki that unpacks the cont-tmf zip, tests format generation and
> missing things; kind of user download simulation]
Actually I am doing something like this for some time now: I install
Co
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Patrick Gundlach wrote:
Hello Hans,
MS-word by looking at the "rivers" and the lack of
but tex is *not* avoiding rivers, since it does not look at it -)
Not yet :-)
It is easy to make TeX look, but not as easy to make it see :-)
It has to do with grayness, so i wonder what
Patrick Gundlach wrote:
Hello Hans,
MS-word by looking at the "rivers" and the lack of
but tex is *not* avoiding rivers, since it does not look at it -)
Not yet :-)
It is easy to make TeX look, but not as easy to make it see :-)
Taco
___
ntg-context maili
Hello Hans,
>> MS-word by looking at the "rivers" and the lack of
>
> but tex is *not* avoiding rivers, since it does not look at it -)
Not yet :-)
Patrick
--
ConTeXt wiki: http://contextgarden.net
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http:
Ciro A. Soto wrote:
I suppose there is a problem then ...right?
Yes, there is.
I'm sorry I missed that you were using plain earlier, I must be getting
too old for this stuff. ;-) Thanks Patrick!
This thread is (almost certainly) discussing the same problem:
http://archive.contextgarden.net/messa
well, I did the test running texexec on a file
containing only this line:
\showhyphens{hyphenation}
and got:
TeXExec 5.2.4 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005
executable : pdfetex
format : cont-en
inputfile : 4test
output : pdftex
Hello Taco,
>> this is what I get. I got a *similar* line
>> to what you sent, but not the same. Is it ok?
> looks fine,
are you sure that the hyphenation configuration is the same in plain
and ConTeXt? Perhaps it is a bit late for me, but I think that the
test has to be done within ConTeXt to
