Hi Hans and Mikael,
Thanks for your solutions. I’m happy to discard paths that have no area, so I
used:
q = for i = 1 upto 3 :
if (length(p[i]) > 1): p[i] && fi
endfor
cycle ;
This worked in the MWE, but it didn’t solve my problem in the globes module.
Something else must be
On 12/31/2023 8:06 AM, Mikael Sundqvist wrote:
\startMPpage
path p[], q ;
p1 = fullcircle scaled 3cm ;
p2 = fullcircle scaled 2cm shifted (3cm,0) ;
p3 = (3cm,2cm) ;
p4 = fullcircle ;
q = p[1] for i = 2 upto 3:
if (length(p[i]) == 0): &&& else: && fi p[i]
endfor
&& cycle ;
eofill q withcolor 0.9
Hi
On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 3:33 AM Gavin via ntg-context
wrote:
>
> Hi MetaFun fans,
>
> Following a suggestion of Hans, I experimented with && and &&& and for
> joining paths in MetaFun. The joiner &&& produces one long path, but && and
> seem to produce a disconnected path which
luigi.scarso wrote:
hmm, try on ctan:
ctan/support/pstoedit/windows
It should be an older (3.31) but good version .
cited from the webpage:
New or changed in 3.32:
...
workaround to cope with a change introduced since ghostscript 7.04.
Some new operators were added to ghostscript's
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I tried it out before reading that paragraph and I can approve: unless
you have an ancient GS, it doesn't work at all. 3.40 at least does
something even though it crashes.
but i have no problems here with gs 8.51 (all 8 versions worked ok) and pstoedit
3.33, so how
luigi.scarso wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I tried it out before reading that paragraph and I can approve: unless
you have an ancient GS, it doesn't work at all. 3.40 at least does
something even though it crashes.
but i have no problems here with gs 8.51 (all 8
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I believe that the version 3.33 works, but I can't find it anywhere.
i mailed you a copy yesterday (1 meg attachment) but you rmail agent may be to
picky on zip files
Hans
-
Jojo wrote:
Would you plan to release a Chinese version? I am glad to be a volunteer translate
for that.
could be a challenge, remind me later (once the source code of the manual is stable
translation should be no problem)
Hans
+++ Hans Hagen [31/08/04 10:25 +0200]:
Jojo wrote:
Would you plan to release a Chinese version? I am glad to be a volunteer translate
for that.
could be a challenge, remind me later (once the source code of the manual is stable
translation should be no problem)
Best wishes!
+++ Brooks Moses [30/08/04 12:37 -0700]:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 09:21:29PM +0200, Floris van Manen wrote:
I'm going to 'finish' the metafun manual, so if you have topics that
need to be covered ...
That's Great !!
If you'd like volunteers to proofread the finished version, I'd be glad
Hi,
try texexec --alone --make metafun
and your texexec is (as far as I can judge) far out of date.
TeXExec 4.3 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2004
is current
Patrick
--
texshow-web: http://members.ping.de:8061
ConTeXt wiki: http://members.ping.de:8062
you are right...mine is 3.1
but I don't understand...I downloaded cont-tmf.zip yesterday from
pragma-ade downloading page...
is it not the right place/version?
where should I get the lattest?
thanks again !
Jose
Hi,
try texexec --alone --make metafun
and your texexec is (as far as I
Hi,
but I don't understand...I downloaded cont-tmf.zip yesterday from
pragma-ade downloading page...
is it not the right place/version?
that is the only authorative(spelling?) place to download... There
are mirrors, but I don't know how uptodate they are.
The output you have sent me
yep, it seems to work...it generates metafun.mem in the same directory it
was invoked...
do I have to invoke
texexec --make --alone
in a specific directory to perform correct installation of ConTeXt ?
I have not seen anything like that mentioned in install document...
is lattest version of
Hi Jose,
do I have to invoke
texexec --make --alone
in a specific directory to perform correct installation of ConTeXt ?
texexec --make --alone bypasses your distribution's way of installing
format files (fmtutil in your case I guess).
Put the resulting format files (*.fmt, *efmt, *mem) in
Patrick Gundlach wrote:
Hi,
but I don't understand...I downloaded cont-tmf.zip yesterday from
pragma-ade downloading page...
is it not the right place/version?
that is the only authorative(spelling?) place to download... There
are mirrors, but I don't know how uptodate they are.
The output
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yep, it seems to work...it generates metafun.mem in the same directory it
was invoked...
do I have to invoke
texexec --make --alone
in a specific directory to perform correct installation of ConTeXt ?
I have not seen anything like that mentioned in install document...
17 matches
Mail list logo
