On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 06:32:13PM -0600, Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
Hi Hans,
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:45:10 -0600, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Khaled Hosny wrote:
Using Luatex engine, ZWNJ and ZWJ chars are rendered incorrectly. If the
font has a glyph for it, it does the
Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 06:32:13PM -0600, Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
Hi Hans,
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:45:10 -0600, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Khaled Hosny wrote:
Using Luatex engine, ZWNJ and ZWJ chars are rendered incorrectly. If the
font has a glyph for it, it
Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
Can this be made an option, so fonts that contain zwj zwnj are not
affected?
ok, the next version will have
otf.remove_joiners = true -- default
later we can make it an option in the font definition
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:45:31 -0600, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
Can this be made an option, so fonts that contain zwj zwnj are not
affected?
ok, the next version will have
otf.remove_joiners = true -- default
Our main test fonts + professional fonts
Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:45:31 -0600, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
Can this be made an option, so fonts that contain zwj zwnj are not
affected?
ok, the next version will have
otf.remove_joiners = true -- default
Our main test
Khaled Hosny wrote:
Using Luatex engine, ZWNJ and ZWJ chars are rendered incorrectly. If the
font has a glyph for it, it does the expected behaviour (force
non-joining or joining respectively) but the glyph get rendered while it
shouldn't. But if the font has no glyphs for it, it has no effect
Khaled Hosny wrote:
Using Luatex engine, ZWNJ and ZWJ chars are rendered incorrectly. If the
font has a glyph for it, it does the expected behaviour (force
non-joining or joining respectively) but the glyph get rendered while it
shouldn't. But if the font has no glyphs for it, it has no effect
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 05:45:10PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Khaled Hosny wrote:
Using Luatex engine, ZWNJ and ZWJ chars are rendered incorrectly. If the
font has a glyph for it, it does the expected behaviour (force
non-joining or joining respectively) but the glyph get rendered while it
Hi Hans,
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:45:10 -0600, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Khaled Hosny wrote:
Using Luatex engine, ZWNJ and ZWJ chars are rendered incorrectly. If the
font has a glyph for it, it does the expected behaviour (force
non-joining or joining respectively) but the glyph get
Using Luatex engine, ZWNJ and ZWJ chars are rendered incorrectly. If the
font has a glyph for it, it does the expected behaviour (force
non-joining or joining respectively) but the glyph get rendered while it
shouldn't. But if the font has no glyphs for it, it has no effect at
all. See the
10 matches
Mail list logo
