On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Hans van der Meer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following minimal example goes wrong:
> \starttext
> \startitemize[a]
> \item sub a
>\startitemize
>\item sub a1
>\item sub a2
>\stopitemize
> \item sub b
> \stopitemize
> \stoptext
>
The following minimal example goes wrong:
\starttext
\startitemize[a]
\item sub a
\startitemize
\item sub a1
\item sub a2
\stopitemize
\item sub b
\stopitemize
\stoptext
The result is:
. sub a
- sub a1
- sub a2
a. sub b
Whereas:
\starttext
\startitemize[a]
\i
Aditya,
Many thanks, that works beautifully.
Thanks again.
Richard
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I just tried the following on Context Live:
>
> \starttext
> \startitemize[n]
> \item one
> \item two
>\startitemize
> \item a
> \item b
>\sto
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> Am 2008-04-29 um 17:49 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
>>> I just tried the following on Context Live:
>>>
>>> \starttext
>>> \startitemize[n]
>>> \item one
>>> \item two
>>>\startitemize
>>> \item a
>>> \item b
>>>\stopitemize
>>> \it
Am 2008-04-29 um 17:49 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
>> I just tried the following on Context Live:
>>
>> \starttext
>> \startitemize[n]
>> \item one
>> \item two
>>\startitemize
>> \item a
>> \item b
>>\stopitemize
>> \item three
>> \stopitemize
>> \stoptext
>>
>> and the first item
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I just tried the following on Context Live:
>
> \starttext
> \startitemize[n]
> \item one
> \item two
>\startitemize
> \item a
> \item b
>\stopitemize
> \item three
> \stopitemize
> \stoptext
>
> and the first item
Hello All,
I just tried the following on Context Live:
\starttext
\startitemize[n]
\item one
\item two
\startitemize
\item a
\item b
\stopitemize
\item three
\stopitemize
\stoptext
and the first itemize starts at 0. Remove the inner itemize and it starts
at 1.
Is th
