Re: [NTG-context] [Math in ConTeXt]

2014-02-18 Thread Matthias Weber
Thanks Otared for the offer to look into math issues.

Here are a few I noticed when TeXing an MK2 set of notes with MK4.

Matthias

\starttext
\startformula
\text{\bf R}^n = R^n ={\bf R}^n= \mathbb{R}^n
\stopformula
%spacing of  exponent is in Mk4 wider than in Mk2

\startformula
\left| \int_{a_{i-1}}^b e^x\, dx \right|
\stopformula
% lower bound runs into \left|
% space between integral sign and integrand too wide


\startformula
r'=r''
\stopformula

This $\int_{a}^b e^x\, dx $ is not good. 
% Inline math integrals need limits at the side. Spacing with lines below and 
above is awkward otherwise.

\startformula
area(f) = \iint_{\Omega} |{f_u\times f_v}|\, du dv
\stopformula

% limit not centered over double integral
\placeformula[-]

\stoptext


On Feb 16, 2014, at 5:30 AM, Otared Kavian  wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> After a series of exchanges on the list, on the topic of how mathematics 
> typesetting is and should be in ConTeXt, I am writing you this message to ask 
> all those who use ConTeXt to typeset mathematics and who encounter various 
> types of difficulties, or shortcomings, to send me their remarks, either on 
> list or off list. 
> I will check the problems with Aditya Mahajan and Mikael Sundqvist, and then 
> submit feature requests or bug reports to Hans and Aditya who will try to fix 
> the issues (I have asked these people about this, and they all agree…).
> 
> In order to help me manage efficiently the task, please add the following tag 
> 
>   [Math on ConTeXt]
> 
> to the Subject field of your message.
> 
> The issues which may be addressed are of the following categories:
> 
>   1. Differences in the output of ConTeXt mkiv vs mkii (due to 
> differences in engine)
> 
>   2.  Differences in the output of ConTeXt mkiv vs LuaLaTeX + Opentype 
> math fonts (due to differences in macro package)
> 
>   3. Differences in the output of ConTeXt mkiv vs PDFLaTeX + AMSMath (due 
> to differences in expectation)
> 
>   4. Bug reports (regarding commands of plain TeX missing in ConTeXt, the 
> position of math accents, etc…)
> 
> Indeed some of the issues may have their origin in the fonts (therefore not 
> easy to fix thouroughly), but others may be fixed once the expectations are 
> clearly expressed. 
> As usual, please give minimal examples imbedded in 
> 
>   \starttext
>   ………
>\stoptext 
> 
> so that we can test the issue you are reporting.
> Thanks for your attention and cooperation,
> Best regards: OK
> 
> 
> ___
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
> Wiki!
> 
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
> ___

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

[NTG-context] [Math in ConTeXt]

2014-02-16 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi all,

After a series of exchanges on the list, on the topic of how mathematics 
typesetting is and should be in ConTeXt, I am writing you this message to ask 
all those who use ConTeXt to typeset mathematics and who encounter various 
types of difficulties, or shortcomings, to send me their remarks, either on 
list or off list. 
I will check the problems with Aditya Mahajan and Mikael Sundqvist, and then 
submit feature requests or bug reports to Hans and Aditya who will try to fix 
the issues (I have asked these people about this, and they all agree…).

In order to help me manage efficiently the task, please add the following tag 

[Math on ConTeXt]

to the Subject field of your message.

The issues which may be addressed are of the following categories:

1. Differences in the output of ConTeXt mkiv vs mkii (due to 
differences in engine)

2.  Differences in the output of ConTeXt mkiv vs LuaLaTeX + Opentype 
math fonts (due to differences in macro package)

3. Differences in the output of ConTeXt mkiv vs PDFLaTeX + AMSMath (due 
to differences in expectation)

4. Bug reports (regarding commands of plain TeX missing in ConTeXt, the 
position of math accents, etc…)

Indeed some of the issues may have their origin in the fonts (therefore not 
easy to fix thouroughly), but others may be fixed once the expectations are 
clearly expressed. 
As usual, please give minimal examples imbedded in 

\starttext
………
 \stoptext 

so that we can test the issue you are reporting.
Thanks for your attention and cooperation,
Best regards: OK


___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] math in ConTeXt

2004-06-25 Thread Otared Kavian
is ConTeXt prepared for math?
I mean...can I do...
$\sum_{i=1}^{n}{x_{i}}$
as I used to in LaTeX ?
I don't make the \Sigma to be under and over characterised by i=1 and n.
Jose
Hi Jose,
Indeed ConTeXt contains all the plain TeX commands and you can use 
them (in this case \sum). So these formulas give what you want
$\sum_{i=1}^n x_i$ (for the summation)
$\prod_{i=1}^{i=n} (1+x_i)$ (for the product), and so on.

For the displayed version you can use either
$$\sum_{i=1}^n x_i$$
or
\startformula
\sum_{i=1}^n x_i
\stopformula
Best regards: OK
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] math in ConTeXt

2004-06-25 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hello,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is ConTeXt prepared for math?
 

With regard to mathematics ConTeXt can do all things which plain TeX can.
I mean...can I do...
$\sum_{i=1}^{n}{x_{i}}$
as I used to in LaTeX?
 

Yes. For displaymath you can use plain TeX's $$\sum$$ or better
\placeformula
\startformula
\stopfromula
(LaTeX's \[ ... \] doesn't work.)
I don't make the \Sigma to be under and over characterised by i=1 and n.
In inline math you need \limits\sum if you want to have the i=1 below 
and the n above the sum sign. If I'm not mistaken, LaTeX does the same.

Regards,
Tobias
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


[NTG-context] math in ConTeXt

2004-06-25 Thread jimarin
is ConTeXt prepared for math?

I mean...can I do...

$\sum_{i=1}^{n}{x_{i}}$

as I used to in LaTeX ?

I don't make the \Sigma to be under and over characterised by i=1 and n.

Jose
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re[2]: [NTG-context] math in context

2003-09-29 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Friday, September 26, 2003 Hans Hagen wrote:

> At 06:51 26/09/2003 +0100, you wrote:
>>I woul like to know where I may find a complete list of symbols like
>>
>>$\Bbb{R}$
>>
>>to use in context while I am typing maths.
>>
>>The main hurdle that I have today in change my personal typset work from
>>latex to context is a lack of a reference manual in this area.
>>Do you know where I may find one?

> Most of the symbols of ams math are available, furthermore, GB (why is he
> so silent) has ported the nath system

Sorry, I was silent because I was away for two days ... now I'm
back.

Hans, we *need* a ConTeXt section on CTAN. Please. So that I
can put my stuff there, and you should upload your betas there
too.

-- 
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta

___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] math in context

2003-09-26 Thread Hans Hagen
At 06:51 26/09/2003 +0100, you wrote:
I woul like to know where I may find a complete list of symbols like

$\Bbb{R}$

to use in context while I am typing maths.

The main hurdle that I have today in change my personal typset work from
latex to context is a lack of a reference manual in this area.
Do you know where I may find one?
Most of the symbols of ams math are available, furthermore, GB (why is he 
so silent) has ported the nath system

Hans
-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
 tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
-
   information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf
documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf
-
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


[NTG-context] math in context

2003-09-25 Thread gmorais
I woul like to know where I may find a complete list of symbols like 

$\Bbb{R}$

to use in context while I am typing maths.

The main hurdle that I have today in change my personal typset work from
latex to context is a lack of a reference manual in this area.
Do you know where I may find one?

Thanks in advance

Gonçalo Morais 



___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


[NTG-context] Math in context

2003-07-31 Thread David Arnold
Giuseppe,

Hans tells me you have developed the math mode into something special. Is
their documentation or instructions anywhere on how to use it?

I'd like to experiment.


___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context