Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 17:05, Hans Hagen wrote:
Yue Wang wrote:
It depends if the Minimals are intended to be a complete TeX system or
if they are meant to be a minimal system for ConTeXt, possibly
complementing the utility programs from TeX Live.
it is just context
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 13:09, Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hans ... I suspect that ConTeXt MKII (both pdftex and xetex) are
missing from the list ...
indeed. mkiv only as i don't want dependencies on perl/ruby in this case
So ... should I start blackmailing with I'll remove it
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 13:09, Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hans ... I suspect that ConTeXt MKII (both pdftex and xetex) are
missing from the list ...
indeed. mkiv only as i don't want dependencies on perl/ruby in this case
So ... should I start blackmailing
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 17:05, Hans Hagen wrote:
Yue Wang wrote:
It depends if the Minimals are intended to be a complete TeX system or
if they are meant to be a minimal system for ConTeXt, possibly
complementing the utility programs from TeX Live.
it is just context minimals' extra...
Yue Wang wrote:
btw, if one uses mkiv, ruby is no longer needed unless one wants to run
specific scripts that are not yet luafied; but then, installing ruby is no
big deal anyway
How about process the mkii document using lua script too? So
eventually we can get rid of ruby and perl.
for that
the mswincontext zip always provided ruby and gs and as well as xmlproc and
xsltproc
it's just that now that we have the garden minimals i no longer make my own
so making mswincontex makes less sense too
What about make a mswinbonus.zip for the user who need them,
like MacTeX shipped its
Yue Wang wrote:
the mswincontext zip always provided ruby and gs and as well as xmlproc and
xsltproc
it's just that now that we have the garden minimals i no longer make my own
so making mswincontex makes less sense too
What about make a mswinbonus.zip for the user who need them,
like
It depends if the Minimals are intended to be a complete TeX system or
if they are meant to be a minimal system for ConTeXt, possibly
complementing the utility programs from TeX Live.
it is just context minimals' extra...
minimals can still be a minimal system for ConTeXt.
—Joel Salomon
Yue Wang wrote:
It depends if the Minimals are intended to be a complete TeX system or
if they are meant to be a minimal system for ConTeXt, possibly
complementing the utility programs from TeX Live.
it is just context minimals' extra...
minimals can still be a minimal system for ConTeXt.
Am 15.06.2009 um 17:05 schrieb Hans Hagen:
it is just context minimals' extra...
minimals can still be a minimal system for ConTeXt.
there will be a goodies option:
--goodies=scite,texworks,xml,gs
but not many more
Is it also possible to change --extras=... to --modules=... (or keep
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Hello,
For me, pstopdf is a number one candidate to luafication :)
(Had problems with it recently)
yes, will be done (we use it here in workflows with massive amounts of
conversions, auto downsampling, etc)
Hans
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Hello,
For me, pstopdf is a number one candidate to luafication :)
(Had problems with it recently)
yes, will be done (we use it here in workflows with massive amounts of
conversions, auto
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 17:22, luigi scarso wrote:
For me, pstopdf is a number one candidate to luafication :)
(Had problems with it recently)
yes, will be done (we use it here in workflows with massive amounts of
conversions, auto downsampling, etc)
If I understand well, pstopdf uses
luigi scarso wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Hello,
For me, pstopdf is a number one candidate to luafication :)
(Had problems with it recently)
yes, will be done (we use it here in workflows with massive amounts of
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 17:22, luigi scarso wrote:
For me, pstopdf is a number one candidate to luafication :)
(Had problems with it recently)
yes, will be done (we use it here in workflows with massive amounts of
conversions, auto downsampling, etc)
If I understand
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Mojca Miklavec
mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 17:22, luigi scarso wrote:
For me, pstopdf is a number one candidate to luafication :)
(Had problems with it recently)
yes, will be done (we use it here in workflows with
If I understand well, pstopdf uses ghostscript .
luafication will use ghostscript again ?
sure, what else ... actually, pstopdf started out as some perl script long
ago (when we started using pdftex) and we needed it not only in order to
convert to pdf, but also to clean up some mess in
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 19:26, luigi scarso wrote:
The problem is that current pstopdf doesn't work reliably for me (no
way to do EPSCrop, sometimes wrong paper orientation, the graphic
missing completely ...),
hmm strange -- do you have an example ?
For wrong paper orientation you can try
luigi scarso wrote:
If I understand well, pstopdf uses ghostscript .
luafication will use ghostscript again ?
sure, what else ... actually, pstopdf started out as some perl script long
ago (when we started using pdftex) and we needed it not only in order to
convert to pdf, but also to clean
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Mojca Miklavec
mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 19:26, luigi scarso wrote:
The problem is that current pstopdf doesn't work reliably for me (no
way to do EPSCrop, sometimes wrong paper orientation, the graphic
missing
btw, if one uses mkiv, ruby is no longer needed unless one wants to run
specific scripts that are not yet luafied; but then, installing ruby is no
big deal anyway
How about process the mkii document using lua script too? So
eventually we can get rid of ruby and perl.
now context script
Am 2009-06-13 um 04:29 schrieb Yue Wang:
right now the most important thing missing in the distribution is:
gs, ruby, xml stuffs, gzip, zip, and tidy.
of course; at best just include a whole Windows.
No, really, before providing everything in some monster install,
better provide a Linux VM
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2009-06-13 um 04:29 schrieb Yue Wang:
right now the most important thing missing in the distribution is:
gs, ruby, xml stuffs, gzip, zip, and tidy.
of course; at best just include a whole Windows.
No, really, before providing everything in some monster install,
Hello,
For me, pstopdf is a number one candidate to luafication :)
(Had problems with it recently)
Vyatcheslav
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist :
Kevin D. Robbins wrote:
Thanks! I'll play around a bit with TeXWorks and Notepad++.
i have texworks kind of working (stripped and patched set of
configuration files) and at some point i will add them to the distribution
-
right now the most important thing missing in the distribution is:
gs, ruby, xml stuffs, gzip, zip, and tidy.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Kevin D. Robbins wrote:
Thanks! I'll play around a bit with TeXWorks and Notepad++.
i have texworks kind of working
stand-alone CONTEXTediting environment (windows) is not available?
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
Carlos Breton Besnier wrote:
stand-alone CONTEXTediting environment (windows) is not available?
no, as i need to spend some time on getting scite into the minimals as
option
-
Hans
Good news! I just wanted to say that including Scite with ConTeXt support in
minimals as an option will be very helpful to me, because I need to support
users who only work on Windows and are not really comfortable using only a
command line interface. I'll be happy to test this option.
Kevin
On
why not support Emacs? AucTeX is mature.
Kevin D. Robbins wrote:
Good news! I just wanted to say that including Scite with ConTeXt
support in minimals as an option will be very helpful to me, because I
need to support users who only work on Windows and are not really
comfortable using only a
Well, I and another colleague do use Emacs on Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux
alike. The folks I'm planning to help get started with ConTeXt, though, are
as intimidated by Emacs as they are by the command line. I'm hoping that
Scite will feel a bit more natural to them.
Kevin
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009
TeXworks would be a good choice too, if you want a simple interface that
just works. It can be used as a portable application on windows too, and
I believe it can combined easily with context minimals.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 01:06:31PM -0600, Kevin D. Robbins wrote:
Well, I and another
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:05:07 -0600, Kevin D. Robbins
krobb...@alumni.princeton.edu wrote:
Good news! I just wanted to say that including Scite with ConTeXt
support in minimals as an option will be very helpful to me, because I
need to support users who only work on Windows and are not
Thanks! I'll play around a bit with TeXWorks and Notepad++.
Kevin
2009/6/11 Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد isha...@colostate.edu
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:05:07 -0600, Kevin D. Robbins
krobb...@alumni.princeton.edu wrote:
Good news! I just wanted to say that including Scite with ConTeXt
On 1/19/06, Miguel Queiros wrote:
http://www.pragma-ade.com/context/install/mswincontext.zip
Can someone explain to me what this is? If it is downloaded and
unzipped, is it ready to go? Is there documentation of this
particular zip?
See isoimage\usr\local\context\tex\setuptex.bat:
REM
Am 2006-01-19 um 09:35 schrieb Ville Voipio:
Can someone explain to me what this is? If it is downloaded and
unzipped, is it ready to go? Is there documentation of this
particular zip? Is there an editor in this zip configured and
ready to go?
Here is a step by step of how it should
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Thank you, I'm wikifying that.
see http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Windows_Installation
Oh, great if you do it (then I don't need to). Thanks.
Greetlings from Lake Constance!
Greetings from slightly cool (-22 'C at the moment) Finland.
- Ville
All,
At:
http://www.pragma-ade.com/download-1.htm
There is:
http://www.pragma-ade.com/context/install/mswincontext.zip
Can someone explain to me what this is? If it is downloaded and
unzipped, is it ready to go? Is there documentation of this
particular zip? Is there an editor in this
http://www.pragma-ade.com/context/install/mswincontext.zip
is all that I use. Dump it as C:\ConTeXt
add it to your PATH, or add a
CALL setuptex C:\ConTeXt\tex
to you batch files, editor, whatever, before invoking texexec
read the README
and u're good to go. Just need to be clear on which
http://www.pragma-ade.com/context/install/mswincontext.zip
Can someone explain to me what this is? If it is downloaded and
unzipped, is it ready to go? Is there documentation of this
particular zip? Is there an editor in this zip configured and ready
to go?
I'm using it. You just
David Arnold wrote:
All,
At:
http://www.pragma-ade.com/download-1.htm
There is:
http://www.pragma-ade.com/context/install/mswincontext.zip
Can someone explain to me what this is? If it is downloaded and
unzipped, is it ready to go? Is there documentation of this
particular zip? Is
Hans,
I don't see cdwincontext on
http://pragma-ade.com/download-1.htm
Where can I find it?
On Jan 18, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
David Arnold wrote:
All,
At:
http://www.pragma-ade.com/download-1.htm
There is:
http://www.pragma-ade.com/context/install/mswincontext.zip
Can
42 matches
Mail list logo