Today first-setup.sh ended with
status-of-update.lus
instead of expected
status-of-update.lua
Is it
correct ?
I don't know, but I get the status-of-update.lus file
too (Linux 64 bit)
Jelle
___
If your question
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 9:58 AM, je...@jhnet.nl wrote:
Today first-setup.sh ended with
status-of-update.lus
instead of expected
status-of-update.lua
Is it correct ?
I don't know, but I get the status-of-update.lus file too (Linux 64 bit)
Confirm that this is the case on windows too.
On 4-6-2010 10:31, Marius wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 9:58 AM,je...@jhnet.nl wrote:
Today first-setup.sh ended with
status-of-update.lus
instead of expected
status-of-update.lua
Is it correct ?
I don't know, but I get the status-of-update.lus file too (Linux 64 bit)
Confirm that this is
Today first-setup.sh ended with
status-of-update.lus
instead of expected
status-of-update.lua
Is it correct ?
--
luigi
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!