Re: [NTG-context] Bug in math arrows

[Aditya Mahajan]

On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:




 Aditya Mahajan 
 10. Januar 2018 um 17:27
 Hi,

 There is a bug in extensible arrows. The syntax of extensible arrows is:

 \xleftarrow{below}{top}

 but when the optional argument is used

 \xleftarrow[small]{A}{B}

 then A ends up on the top and B on the bottom.


The "x" commands change the position of both texts and when you change
the instance for the command the reversed order is overwritten (search for
the order key in math-stc.mkvi).

\starttext

$\xleftarrow{A}{B}$

$\mleftarrow{A}{B}$

\stoptext


I would still consider it a bug :-) Either order is fine but it should be 
used consistently.


Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Bug in math arrows

[Wolfgang Schuster]

Aditya Mahajan 
10. Januar 2018 um 17:27
Hi,

There is a bug in extensible arrows. The syntax of extensible arrows is:

\xleftarrow{below}{top}

but when the optional argument is used

\xleftarrow[small]{A}{B}

then A ends up on the top and B on the bottom.


The "x" commands change the position of both texts and when you change
the instance for the command the reversed order is overwritten (search for
the order key in math-stc.mkvi).

\starttext

$\xleftarrow{A}{B}$

$\mleftarrow{A}{B}$

\stoptext

Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___