Dear Hans,
>> Thank you for your explanation.
>> I just wonder \alinghere can be applicable to multiple formula.
>> It is OK to use \NC \NR for multiple formulas.
> What probably can be done, is to let the next formula start with the align of
> the previous one .. Mikael can add it to our todo
On 9/24/2022 4:51 PM, Jeong Dal via ntg-context wrote:
Dear Aditya, Mikael,
Thank you for your explanation.
I just wonder \alinghere can be applicable to multiple formula.
It is OK to use \NC \NR for multiple formulas.
What probably can be done, is to let the next formula start with the
align
Dear Aditya, Mikael,
Thank you for your explanation.
I just wonder \alinghere can be applicable to multiple formula.
It is OK to use \NC \NR for multiple formulas.
Best regards,
Dalyoung
___
If your question is of
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 8:46 PM Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2022, Jeong Dal via ntg-context wrote:
>
> > Dear Mikael and Hans,
> >
> > Recently, you introdued the new command “\alignhere, \breakhere, \skiphere”
> > which works fine.
> >
> > Since I usually use the
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022, Jeong Dal via ntg-context wrote:
> Dear Mikael and Hans,
>
> Recently, you introdued the new command “\alignhere, \breakhere, \skiphere”
> which works fine.
>
> Since I usually use the following code that is adopted from My
> Way(Mathalign.pdf), I’d like to know that
That was the solution, it worked!
Thank you so much!
/Jan-Erik
> 22 sep. 2022 kl. 14:54 skrev Alexandre Christe via ntg-context
> :
>
> Hi Jan-Erik,
>
> One way I came across searching the mailing list is the following:
>
> \starttext
>
> \startitemize [a,columns,joinedup] [n=3,grid=line]
Hi Jan-Erik,
One way I came across searching the mailing list is the following:
\starttext
\startitemize [a,columns,joinedup] [n=3,grid=line]
\item $ 56 + 2 \cdot 3 $
\item $ 5-(7) $
\item $ \frac{21}{7} $
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Could be that there is a *better* way.
Le jeu. 22 sept. 2022 à
On 7 Jul 2015, at 16:47, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com
wrote:
I get errors when using \MC - see example below.
The \NR before \stopmathcases is missing in all your examples.
OK. Though I know it, it is hard to get used to, coming from LaTeX.
But the spacing is wrong:
On 7 Jul 2015, at 04:46, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com
wrote:
The spacing is different in cases - TeX also has such a variation.
Specifically, there is extra space before the conditionals.
In addition, it seems \startmathcases ... \stopmathcases is not working with
On 7 Jul 2015, at 20:17, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com
wrote:
You can set the alignment for each column in a matrix with the align key.
\definemathmatrix
[aligned]
[n=2,
align={right,left},
distance=\spaceamount]
\starttext
\startformula
J^j:
Hans Aberg mailto:haber...@telia.com
7. Juli 2015 20:53
On 7 Jul 2015, at 20:17, Wolfgang Schusterschuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:
You can set the alignment for each column in a matrix with the align key.
\definemathmatrix
[aligned]
[n=2,
align={right,left},
Hans Aberg mailto:haber...@telia.com
7. Juli 2015 21:11
On 7 Jul 2015, at 20:17, Wolfgang Schusterschuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:
You can set the alignment for each column in a matrix with the align key.
FYI, the document amshelp.pdf says that AMS-LaTeX environments align, align*,
On 7 Jul 2015, at 21:49, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com
wrote:
You should google for mathalign.pdf which explains and shows examples for the
matrix, cases etc. environments.
To get the same result as your LaTeX example you can use the m key for
\startalign.
Hans Aberg mailto:haber...@telia.com
7. Juli 2015 18:23
On 7 Jul 2015, at 16:47, Wolfgang Schusterschuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:
I get errors when using \MC - see example below.
The \NR before \stopmathcases is missing in all your examples.
OK. Though I know it, it is hard to get
On 7 Jul 2015, at 20:17, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com
wrote:
You can set the alignment for each column in a matrix with the align key.
FYI, the document amshelp.pdf says that AMS-LaTeX environments align, align*,
and aligned, can have multiple alignments, and gives this
On 7 Jul 2015, at 21:18, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have also put in an extra alignment to see what happens, monospace code
alignment style. Changing ‘left’ to ‘right did not seem to have any effect
here.
Can you see the effect of the alignment?
On 7 Jul 2015, at 21:49, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com
wrote:
You should google for mathalign.pdf which explains and shows examples for the
matrix, cases etc. environments.
It looks rather basic, except for last formula of section 9.
The document amshelp.pdf, ch. 7, has
Hans Aberg mailto:haber...@telia.com
7. Juli 2015 10:30
On 7 Jul 2015, at 04:46, Wolfgang Schusterschuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:
The spacing is different in cases - TeX also has such a variation.
Specifically, there is extra space before the conditionals.
In addition, it seems
[I do not get copies from the list, though having signed up.]
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
On 6 Jul 2015, at 11:24, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com wrote:
The example below shows the intended output when using original TeX code
(compiled with ‘context' of TeX Live 2015): a pair of left braced
Hans Aberg mailto:haber...@telia.com
7. Juli 2015 01:46
[I do not get copies from the list, though having signed up.]
The spacing is different in cases - TeX also has such a variation.
Specifically, there is extra space before the conditionals.
In addition, it seems \startmathcases ...
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
Is \startformula\startalign\stopalign\stopformula broken in context mkiv?
After just updating the minimals, I now get (using the example below):
See this thread:
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20100513.211849.e7079712.en.html
There will be a new current soon,
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009, Curiouslearn wrote:
Hi,
Can someone please help with the alignment of the equation so that it
starts at left. I tried flushleft and other options (such as without
\NC \NR, with align=left etc.). None of them result in the equation
starting at the left margin. The equation
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hans: we need to either move these definitions from math-ali to strc-mat
or remove
\let\startinnermath\empty
\let\stopinnermath \empty
from strc-mat.mkiv
ok, removed
-
I had tried using \setupformulas, but it did not work when I posted my
question. I suppose it was for the reason you mentioned. I will try it
again, once I have downloaded the latest beta.
Thanks.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:41 AM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009,
Otared, thanks very much for bringing Aditya's article to my
attention. The method worked well.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Otared Kavian ota...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for sending this again: I forgot a closing } in \type{FLalign]…)}…
Hi,
Is this what you want to achieve:
%% begin
Hi,
Is this what you want to achieve:
%% begin
\starttext
From Aditya's \type{mathalign.pdf}, where he defines in fact a
\type{\definemathalignment[flalign]},
(but I prefer \type{FLalign]…) one has
\definemathalignment[FLalign] [m=2, distance=5em plus 1 fil] %We need to set a
default
Sorry for sending this again: I forgot a closing } in \type{FLalign]…)}…
Hi,
Is this what you want to achieve:
%% begin
\starttext
From Aditya's \type{mathalign.pdf}, where he defines in fact a
\type{\definemathalignment[flalign]},
(but I prefer \type{FLalign]…)} one has
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Dnia Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 07:14:58PM -0500, Aditya Mahajan napisa#322;(a):
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to typeset a system of simultaneous equations. I want it to
have a brace on the left (like cases), but
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to typeset a system of simultaneous equations. I want it to
have a brace on the left (like cases), but inside I want it to have
two columns aligned like align. Also, I'd like to have the vertical
space between the equations be
Dnia Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 01:15:28PM -0500, Aditya Mahajan napisa#322;(a):
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to typeset a system of simultaneous equations. I want it to
have a brace on the left (like cases), but inside I want it to have
two columns aligned
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Dnia Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 01:15:28PM -0500, Aditya Mahajan napisa#322;(a):
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to typeset a system of simultaneous equations. I want it to
have a brace on the left (like cases), but
31 matches
Mail list logo
