On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 01:26:06AM +0200, Hans Hagen Outside wrote:
ok; btw, also take a look at sieps afm2pl since it has some other nice
features
Hans
My belated three cents on some of the things which were discussed in
this thread:
As to texnansi: this is supported in Latex by
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 12:09:50PM +0200, Patrick Gundlach wrote:
texnansi does not work with german.sty which I'd say is necessary for
german texts. T1 and OT1 is hardcoded. I don't know about babel.
Patrick
Checking babel.def, I saw that it sets \latinencoding to OT1 if T1
is unavailable
Hi Patrick,
Yes, but what is the problem? We are not talking about other fonts,
just the ones preinstalled by psnfss. We know ervery bit of those
fonts, so no need to reflect the spacing etc. in the filename, since
e.g. phvr8t will always have the same characteristics thougout all
distributions.
Salman Khilji wrote:
I found out that while trying to install the latest ConTeXt over whatever came
with texlive2003-inst-20030928.iso, I screwed up somewhere and ConTeXt would
not even generate me a pdf file with cmr fonts.
So here is what I did.
1) I deleted everything about TeX from my
On Friday 20 August 2004 09:40 am, Patrick Gundlach wrote:
So [EMAIL PROTECTED] should report again.
Still no luck!!! :-(
Okay, so I got really upset with teTeX so I decided to get rid of it. Earlier
I said that I was using Fedora Core 2. Now I am sitting on a SuSE 8.0 Pro
machine. I
I found out that while trying to install the latest ConTeXt over whatever came
with texlive2003-inst-20030928.iso, I screwed up somewhere and ConTeXt would
not even generate me a pdf file with cmr fonts.
So here is what I did.
1) I deleted everything about TeX from my system
2) Installed
Okay. Problem solved. The thing is that I did not ask the texlive
distribution to install the extra fonts package. The palatino fonts were
part of the extra fonts.
Now I have another question. It seems like \setupbodyfont[palatino] produces
different results than \setupbodyfont[ppl].
The
Patrick Gundlach wrote:
And the argument about being too LaTeXy: the encoding of these files
is not LaTeX specific (besides from the fact that LaTeX can only
handle T1/OT1 encoding right), so what is not generic about them?
if you run afm2tfm on some files you get different results that the
Patrick Gundlach wrote:
Yes, but you stated that different metrics, different subpaths, urw
instances either or not present. Different metrics? I can't see any
differences in metrics between differnent distributions on those
fonts! Can you? They come from one source, i.e psnfss. Different
Patrick Gundlach wrote:
Hello Hans,
[...]
but type-akb.tex should be there ...
\usetypescriptfile[type-akb]
Hmm, shouldn't \usetypescript[adobekb][..] be enough to load the file?
I have just deleted my tetex 2 installation, so I can't verify. type-akb.tex
didn't get loaded with fedora
Patrick Gundlach wrote:
Hi,
[...]
I also tried:
\usetypescript[adobekb][\defaultencoding]
\usetypescript[palatino][\defaultencoding]
\setupbodyfont[palatino,12pt]
Patrick
Concerning those fonts, there are differences between distributions:
different metrics, different subpaths,
11 matches
Mail list logo
