Hi Aditya,
>> \starttext
>> \setupitemize[2][packed]
> [...]
>> \setupitemize[1][packed]
>
> so in this example both are packed :)
Right after sending my mail I realized that this could be used against
me :)
> Right now packedlistitem is for the entire itemgroup rather than for
> each level.
Quoting Patrick Gundlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I am slightly confused with the second part of the following example.
> IMO only the 1st level should be packed, not the second.
>
> Patrick
> --
>
> \starttext
> \setupitemize[2][packed]
[...]
Should I downgrade to an older Context version, or is
there a fix available ?
TIA
Wim
> Hamid Kamrani wrote:
>> This happens on live context too. Itemize starts with 0 in some
>> situations. You can create the problem with:
__
This happens on live context too. Itemize starts with 0 in some
situations. You can create the problem with:
\starttext
\bTABLE
\bTR
\bTD
\startitemize[n]
\item one
\item two
\stopitemize
\eTD
\eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
On 7/1/07, Aditya Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, [EMA
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To Aditya
>
>> It is possible that this change caused your existing setup to break.
>> Can you create a minimum example that exhibits the problem? Start with
>> Patrick's example, and start adding lines from your setup, so that the
>> problem reappear
To Aditya
>It is possible that this change caused your existing setup to break.
>Can you create a minimum example that exhibits the problem? Start with
>Patrick's example, and start adding lines from your setup, so that the
>problem reappears. That may help in figuring out if it is something
>wron
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Patrick et al,
>
> I also tried it on live.contextgarden.net and there it works fine.
> But not with my Context.
>
> I have some definitions but they did not change for more than 6 months,
> and comparing my setups with some of my backups, nothing has
Patrick et al,
I also tried it on live.contextgarden.net and there it works fine.
But not with my Context.
I have some definitions but they did not change for more than 6 months,
and comparing my setups with some of my backups, nothing has changed.
The only change is that I updated Context with c
Hello Wim,
> When I use
> \startitemize[n]
> \item One
> \item Two
> \stopitemize
>
> the list starts at 0 (zero) instead of 1 (one)
\starttext
\startitemize[n]
\item One
\item Two
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Are you sure about this? I've just tried the above in
live.contextgarden.net and the result
Hallo!
> >> use \par at the end of the question
> >>
> >
> > Why?
> >
> \question pick up it sargument and uses \par as delimiter, otherwise
> we could not apply attributes to the question text
>
> \question is the 'minimalistic approach,
>
> \startquestion
> \stopquestion
>
> is the
Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini wrote:
> Hi Bernd!
>
>
>>> what I am doing wrong with the following snipped?
>>>
>>> The \par in the \item does not work.
>>> ---
>>> \defineenumeration[question][location=top,text=Aufgabe]
>>> \defineblock[question]
>
Hi Bernd!
> > what I am doing wrong with the following snipped?
> >
> > The \par in the \item does not work.
> > ---
> > \defineenumeration[question][location=top,text=Aufgabe]
> > \defineblock[question]
> >
> > \starttext
> > \chapter{Aufgaben}
Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini schrieb:
> Hallo,
>
> what I am doing wrong with the following snipped?
>
> The \par in the \item does not work.
> ---
> \defineenumeration[question][location=top,text=Aufgabe]
> \defineblock[question]
>
> \starttext
> \c
2007/4/4, Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hallo,
what I am doing wrong with the following snipped?
The \par in the \item does not work.
---
\defineenumeration[question][location=top,text=Aufgabe]
\defineblock[question]
\startt
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> \placefigure will always start a new paragraph, but usually you don't
> notice that since you want it in a separate paragraph anyway. It has
> to do with boxes, although I have no idea how exactly Hans implemented
> "itemize/itemgroup" environment.
>
> You can help yourself
On 10/3/06, plink wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as soon as I put a placefigure in an \item paragraph, the whole
> paragraph starts one line below the stopper. Is this a conceptual issue
> or just a weirdness?
>
> What is the best way to start at the same height? I couldn´t find
> anything in the wiki or the det
On Fri, 5 May 2006 01:37:45 -0400 (EDT), Aditya Mahajan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yes, that's it. I wondered if it was possible a to specify a different
>> symbol for a head, something like this:
>>
>> \startitemize[n][headstyle=bold]
>> \head Default head symbol (here a number)\par Body
>>
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, nico wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:13:09 +0200, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> nico wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Is it possible to change the symbol of \head in an itemize list, like
>>> \sym
>>> does for \item?
>>>
>> i'm not sure if i understand the question ... h
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:13:09 +0200, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nico wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is it possible to change the symbol of \head in an itemize list, like
>> \sym
>> does for \item?
>>
> i'm not sure if i understand the question ... heads are like items so
> the same symbols
> Olivier wrote:
> > Hi Taco,
> >
> > Quoting "Taco Hoekwater" :
> >
> >>-- was [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Apr 26, 2006 at 01:12:20 --
> >
> >
> >>Olivier wrote:
> >>
> >>>Is there a way to achieve this?
> >>
> >>There is probably a nicer solution, but this works:
> >>
> >>\startitemize[inbetween={\
Olivier wrote:
> Hi Taco,
>
> Quoting "Taco Hoekwater" :
>
>>-- was [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Apr 26, 2006 at 01:12:20 --
>
>
>>Olivier wrote:
>>
>>>Is there a way to achieve this?
>>
>>There is probably a nicer solution, but this works:
>>
>>\startitemize[inbetween={\blank[30pt]\hrule height 0pt
Hi Taco,
Quoting "Taco Hoekwater" :
> -- was [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Apr 26, 2006 at 01:12:20 --
> Olivier wrote:
> >
> > Is there a way to achieve this?
>
> There is probably a nicer solution, but this works:
>
> \startitemize[inbetween={\blank[30pt]\hrule height 0pt}]
I forgot to emphasize th
Olivier wrote:
>
> Is there a way to achieve this?
There is probably a nicer solution, but this works:
\startitemize[inbetween={\blank[30pt]\hrule height 0pt}]
Cheers, taco
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/list
nico wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to change the symbol of \head in an itemize list, like \sym
> does for \item?
>
i'm not sure if i understand the question ... heads are like items so the same
symbols apply (or do you want different symbols for \item and \head in one
itemize?)
--
� wrote:
> Hello,
> is it normal, that the first "margin=5em" is not taken into account, but
> the with \setupitemize it works?
>
> Perhaps I misunderstand the second argument of \startitemize.
>
> \starttext
> \startitemize[packed][margin=5em]
> \item bla
> \item bla
> \stopitemize
>
> \setupitemi
Thanks Taco to help me on this issue.
I eventually use (allmost copy-paste from #context):
\setbox0=\hbox{--~}
\def\indenteddash#1{\hskip\parindent--~}
\definesymbol[indentdash][\indenteddash]
\setupitemize[each][indentdash,packed,joinedup,intext][indentnext=yes,width=\dimexpr
\parindent + \w
Renaud AUBIN wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Up to now, I used:
>
> \startnarrower[left]
> \startitemize[2,packed,joinedup]
> \item 4 liaisons pivot (1 degré de liberté en rotation) soit 4 couples
> cinématiques de classe V,
> \item 1 liaison pivot glissant (2 degrés de liberté dont 1 en rotation
> et 1 e
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>No, the internal macro \dododosetupitemgroupconstant has bug.
>The loose line has to be:
>
> \v!loose*=>\setfalse\optimizelistitem,
>
>instead of
>
> \v!loose*=>\optimizeitemsfalse,
>
>
>
ah, stupid me, repaired
Hans
--
Hans van der Meer wrote:
> Error message:
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> \optimizeitemsfalse
>
> \p!compareprocessaction ...commalistelement {#3}#2
>\expandafter
> \quitcommalis...
> etc.
>
> Is this expected behaviour? The manual does not
OMG, it is that easy!! ConTeXt never ceases to amaze me, I just
didn't think of trying this because it's too obvious. Thanks so much,
Vit, this is just what I was looking for!
Best
Thomas
On Aug 15, 2005, at 11:24 PM, Vit Zyka wrote:
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Dear gang,
This seems like a
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Dear gang,
This seems like a very easy one, but I can't figure it out: on my
slides, I want numbered itemizations to appear item by item, and I want
the previous items to be "greyed out." I think this can only be done by
combining two itemize environments. This is
� wrote:
Hi
This error massage in \startitemize[1, packed] with \setbodyfont[22pt].
this is solved in the current release
you can try
\definebodyfontenvironment[22pt]
(funny, this \ is a backslasg but shows asn an crossed W in my mail agent)
How can I do
syste
201 - 232 of 232 matches
Mail list logo
