On 4-6-2010 10:31, Marius wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 9:58 AM, wrote:
Today first-setup.sh ended with
status-of-update.lus
instead of expected
status-of-update.lua
Is it correct ?
I don't know, but I get the status-of-update.lus file too (Linux 64 bit)
Confirm that this is the case on wi
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 9:58 AM, wrote:
>> Today first-setup.sh ended with
>> status-of-update.lus
>> instead of expected
>> status-of-update.lua
>> Is it correct ?
>
> I don't know, but I get the status-of-update.lus file too (Linux 64 bit)
>
Confirm that this is the case on windows too.
___
> Today first-setup.sh ended with
> status-of-update.lus
> instead of expected
> status-of-update.lua
> Is it
correct ?
I don't know, but I get the status-of-update.lus file
too (Linux 64 bit)
Jelle
___
If your ques
