Am 20.03.2012 um 10:10 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Hi,
how can I define the length of footnote's rule and the distance below it?
rulecommand doesn't seem to take these values (see below).
You have to enable you own command with “rule=command” but then you have to set
rulecolor and rule
Am 20.03.2012 um 14:42 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
You have to enable you own command with “rule=command” but then you have to
set rulecolor and rule thickness in your own definition (best us \blackrule
for this).
rule=command,rulecommand=\MyRule
instead of
rulecommand=\MyRule
hm ...
Am 20.03.2012 um 17:35 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Am 20.03.2012 um 14:42 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
You have to enable you own command with “rule=command” but then you have to
set rulecolor and rule thickness in your own definition (best us \blackrule
for this).
Am 20.03.2012 um 17:45 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 20.03.2012 um 17:35 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Am 20.03.2012 um 14:42 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
You have to enable you own command with “rule=command” but then you have to
set rulecolor and rule thickness in your own definition
On 20-3-2012 18:59, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
But nevertheless, isn't that already implied if I use rulecommand=\MyRule?
To me this already means exactly this: tell context it should use my rule.
Then we need double checking and I'm pretty sure that you would run into
expansion mess again and
Am 20.03.2012 um 19:49 schrieb Hans Hagen:
On 20-3-2012 18:59, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
But nevertheless, isn't that already implied if I use rulecommand=\MyRule?
To me this already means exactly this: tell context it should use my rule.
Then we need double checking and I'm pretty sure
I would like to accomplish the following in xml processing.
node macro=various macro calls and then define the attribute value as a TeX
macro.
For example, to use this in font switching: node
macro=\switchtobodyfont[helvetica]
Doing this in the following manner does not work:
\startxmlsetups
On 16-3-2012 10:25, Meer, H. van der wrote:
I would like to accomplish the following in xml processing.
node macro=various macro calls and then define the attribute value as a
TeX macro.
For example, to use this in font switching:node
macro=\switchtobodyfont[helvetica]
Doing
Hi all,
I need to define numerical coefficients (essentially at random) and then use
them with commands, say like \CoeffAlpha, \CoeffBeta, and so on.
More precisely, how can I define the command \RandomCoeff, so that
\RandomCoeff{Beta}{1}{10} yields a command named \CoeffBeta, which is a random
Reccently I did something random in ctxlua. I post it in the hope it will be
useful.
Hans van der Meer
\startluacode
-- Define our namespace as hvdm
hvdm = hvdm or {}
-- Return random series of numbers 1..n depending on the number of
arguments
function
On Thu, Jan 05 2012, Otared Kavian wrote:
\define[3]\RandomCoeff{%
\ctxlua{a = math.random(#2,#3)}
% \csname{Coeff#1}\endcsname{\ctxlua{tex.print(a)}} %% this line does not
work as expected...
\setuprandomize[2012]
\define[3]\RandomCoeff{%
\expandafter\def\csname
Coeff#1
Am 05.01.2012 um 21:17 schrieb Peter Münster:
On Thu, Jan 05 2012, Otared Kavian wrote:
\define[3]\RandomCoeff{%
\ctxlua{a = math.random(#2,#3)}
%\csname{Coeff#1}\endcsname{\ctxlua{tex.print(a)}} %% this line does not
work as expected...
\setuprandomize[2012]
\define[3
Am 05.01.2012 um 21:11 schrieb Meer, H. van der:
Reccently I did something random in ctxlua. I post it in the hope it will be
useful.
Hans van der Meer
\startluacode
-- Define our namespace as hvdm
hvdm = hvdm or {}
Don’t use a global namespace, you can use “userdata
:
Reccently I did something random in ctxlua. I post it in the hope it will be
useful.
Hans van der Meer
\startluacode
-- Define our namespace as hvdm
hvdm = hvdm or {}
-- Return random series of numbers 1..n depending on the number of
arguments
function
Thanks Peter,
I had tried \expandafter\xdef, \edef, \gdef, but not \expandafter\def…
Thanks for your quick answer: that's exactly what I was looking for.
Best regards: OK
On 5 janv. 2012, at 21:17, Peter Münster wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05 2012, Otared Kavian wrote:
\define[3]\RandomCoeff
Thanks for Wolfgang: your solution, that is
\setuprandomize[2012]
\define[3]\RandomCoeff{%
\setvalue{Coeff#1}{\ctxlua{tex.print(math.random(#2,#3))}}}
works indeed and it is somehow simpler than using \expandafter\csname, and as a
matter of fact, after reading your message I searched
Hi again Wolfgang and Peter,
The solution you provided to my problem is great but has a small issue…
Considering the definition
\define[3]\RandomCoeff{%
\setvalue{Coeff#1}{\ctxlua{tex.print(math.random(#2,#3))}}
}
after saying
\RandomCoeff{Alpha}{1}{10}
one gets
Sorry for the noise…
I found the answer to my last question in module-01.pdf, pages 92 and 93: the
right definition is
\define[3]\RandomCoeff{%
\setevalue{Coeff#1}{\ctxlua{tex.print(math.random(#2,#3))}}
}
that is one has to use \setevalue instead of \setvalue
Am Samstag, den 03.12.2011, 20:09 +0100 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 03.12.2011 um 20:06 schrieb Paul Menzel:
could some please try to parse the following minimal example and report
back if a parse problem occurs. Please find the protocols attached.
\define[1]\abs{\lvert #1
Dear ConTeXt folks,
thanks to Robin’s example documents I found out about the following last
two commands
\Context\ \contextmark\ \contextversion
allowing to put the used components and versions into the document.
Then I found `\luaversion` to display the version of Lua. But I could
Am 03.12.2011 um 19:23 schrieb Paul Menzel:
Dear ConTeXt folks,
thanks to Robin’s example documents I found out about the following last
two commands
\Context\ \contextmark\ \contextversion
allowing to put the used components and versions into the document.
Then I found
Am Samstag, den 03.12.2011, 19:28 +0100 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 03.12.2011 um 19:23 schrieb Paul Menzel:
thanks to Robin’s example documents I found out about the following last
two commands
\Context\ \contextmark\ \contextversion
allowing to put the used components
Dear ConTeXt folks,
could some please try to parse the following minimal example and report
back if a parse problem occurs. Please find the protocols attached.
\define[1]\abs{\lvert #1 \rvert}
\define\Ew{{\mathbf E}}
\define[1]\ew{\Ew \left[ #1 \right
Am 03.12.2011 um 20:06 schrieb Paul Menzel:
Dear ConTeXt folks,
could some please try to parse the following minimal example and report
back if a parse problem occurs. Please find the protocols attached.
\define[1]\abs{\lvert #1 \rvert}
\define\Ew{{\mathbf E
On 22-11-2011 13:08, Pavneet Arora wrote:
I am creating documentation labeling the circuits of electrical and
network panels for a project of mine.
Enclosed is a minimal example.
What I would like is to define two macros: \unused and \spare (\unused
referring to a circuit with no breaker
I am creating documentation labeling the circuits of electrical and network
panels for a project of mine.
Enclosed is a minimal example.
What I would like is to define two macros: \unused and \spare (\unused
referring to a circuit with no breaker installed, while \spare referring
Hi,
in this example the question mark nicely becomes part of the command name:
\def\OverFull?{\overfullrule30\points}
\OverFull?
here it does not work at all:
\define\OverFull?{\overfullrule30\points}
\OverFull?
(... but gives ?? instead)
As \define seems to be more canonical:
Does
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi,
in this example the question mark nicely becomes part of the command name:
\def\OverFull?{\overfullrule30\points}
\OverFull?
here it does not work at all:
\define\OverFull?{\overfullrule30\points}
\OverFull?
(... but gives ?? instead
On 21-7-2011 3:15, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi,
in this example the question mark nicely becomes part of the command name:
\def\OverFull?{\overfullrule30\points}
\OverFull?
here the ? is not part of the command but a delimiter
\OverFull ?
\def\OverFull#1?{\overfullrule30\points}
\OverFull
Hi all,
Is it possible to set a fallback font from which glyphs will be taken
if the current font doesn't have it? For example, I'd want to use
fancy miscellaneous symbols from the Symbola font using their unicode
codepoint without any extra font-changing command (and obviously, I
don't want to
On 17-6-2011 9:43, Vianney le Clément wrote:
Hi all,
Is it possible to set a fallback font from which glyphs will be taken
if the current font doesn't have it? For example, I'd want to use
fancy miscellaneous symbols from the Symbola font using their unicode
codepoint without any extra
2011/6/17 Vianney le Clément vleclem...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
Is it possible to set a fallback font from which glyphs will be taken
if the current font doesn't have it? For example, I'd want to use
fancy miscellaneous symbols from the Symbola font using their unicode
codepoint without any extra
2011/6/17 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl:
% \definefontfeature[zh][mode=node,script=hang,lang=zhs]
% \definefontfallback[serifwhatever] [lmroman10-regular]
[0x-0x0400][force=yes]
% \definefontfallback[serifboldwhatever] [lmroman10-bold]
[0x-0x0400][force=yes]
%
Am 17.06.2011 um 09:43 schrieb Vianney le Clément:
Hi all,
Is it possible to set a fallback font from which glyphs will be taken
if the current font doesn't have it? For example, I'd want to use
fancy miscellaneous symbols from the Symbola font using their unicode
codepoint without any
Dear Otared,
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2011, 23:59 +0200 schrieb Otared Kavian:
I think the error comes from your way of using \define: you use
\define\abs[1]{\lvert #1 \rvert}
instead of
\define[1]\abs{\lvert#1\rvert}
the following works fine for me:
\starttext
%\define
Dear ConTeXt folks,
Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2011, 12:11 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel:
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2011, 23:59 +0200 schrieb Otared Kavian:
I think the error comes from your way of using \define: you use
\define\abs[1]{\lvert #1 \rvert}
instead of
\define[1]\abs{\lvert#1
Am 05.06.2011 um 12:11 schrieb Paul Menzel:
thank you very much for the solution. I took my definition from the Wiki [1].
Could the developers please clarify the correct syntax so that it can be
updated in the source or the Wiki.
The wiki entry is correct, the syntax is
\define[number
Dear ConTeXt folks,
I want to define `\abs` as the command for the absolute value. The
following minimal example is also attached.
\define\abs[1]{\lvert #1 \rvert}
\starttext
$\lvert 2 \rvert$
$\abs{2}$
\stoptext
This does not work though
On Sat, Jun 04 2011, Paul Menzel wrote:
I want to define `\abs` as the command for the absolute value. The
following minimal example is also attached.
\define\abs[1]{\lvert #1 \rvert}
Don't ask me why \define doesn't work (certainly related to
expansion), but \def does the job:
\def
Hi
I think the error comes from your way of using \define: you use
\define\abs[1]{\lvert #1 \rvert}
instead of
\define[1]\abs{\lvert#1\rvert}
the following works fine for me:
\starttext
%\define[1]\abs{|#1|} % this works
\define[1]\abs{\lvert#1\rvert} % this works too
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 05:58, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Jonas Stein wrote:
\define[1]\myoneliner{#1 \par }
raises an error.
(Untested)
\define[1]\myoneliner{#1 \endgraf}
This is also nicely covered in TeXBook.
Alternatively \long\def might work.
Mojca
\define[1]\myoneliner{#1 \par }
raises an error.
\define[1]\myoneliner{#1 \endgraf}
works fine. Thank you!
This is also nicely covered in TeXBook.
Alternatively \long\def might work.
\long\define[1]\myoneliner{#1 \par }
fails too
kind regards,
--
Jonas Stein n...@jonasstein.de
2010/12/16 Jonas Stein n...@jonasstein.de
\define[1]\myoneliner{#1 \par }
raises an error.
\define[1]\myoneliner{#1 \endgraf}
works fine. Thank you!
This is also nicely covered in TeXBook.
Alternatively \long\def might work.
\long\define[1]\myoneliner{#1 \par }
fails too
\long
Am 16.12.2010 um 18:28 schrieb Vedran Miletić:
2010/12/16 Jonas Stein n...@jonasstein.de
\define[1]\myoneliner{#1 \par }
raises an error.
\define[1]\myoneliner{#1 \endgraf}
works fine. Thank you!
This is also nicely covered in TeXBook.
Alternatively \long\def might work
\define[1]\myoneliner{#1 \par }
raises an error.
Why, and how should i repair it?
Kind regards,
--
Jonas Stein n...@jonasstein.de
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Jonas Stein wrote:
\define[1]\myoneliner{#1 \par }
raises an error.
(Untested)
\define[1]\myoneliner{#1 \endgraf}
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add
at line 4
(/Users/graph/ConTeXtMini/tex/texmf-local/tex/context/type-kor.tex)
!define font: font with name unbatangRegular is not found
!define font: unknown font unbatangRegular, loading aborted
!define font: unable to define unbatangRegular as \*Myface12ptrmtf*
systems : begin
Hi,
Jeong Dalyoung wrote:
Both current version and ConTeXt ver: 2010.05.24 13:05 MKIV fmt:
2010.5.27 int: english/english version work same.
Why isn't it able to define unbatangRegular while it can use the
unbatangBold?
Drop the [uc] and '[encoding=uc]' from your typescript
Dear Taco,
Thank you advice.
After deleting [uc] and [encoding=uc], it worked fine.
Every sentences was appeared correctly.
Best regards,
Dalyoung
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add
Curiouser and curiouser! cried Alice.
:)
context has two different versions of \define, there is one in
syst-ext.mkii/syst-aux.mkiv
which has no parameters but prevents you from overwriting a existing
command (there \redefine
with allows this) and another one in core-sys.mkii/mkiv which
On Mon, Apr 19 2010, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
\starttext
\define\hans{hans}
\define\hans{taco}
\stoptext
the output now is 'hans' because \define checks whether a command with the
name \hans is already defined
Hello Wolfgang,
Did you test it? The output is taco here on my system:
MTXrun
Am 19.04.10 21:15, schrieb Peter Münster:
On Mon, Apr 19 2010, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
\starttext
\define\hans{hans}
\define\hans{taco}
\stoptext
the output now is 'hans' because \define checks whether a command with the
name \hans is already defined
Hello Wolfgang,
Did you test
Hello,
Patrick posed a good question on wiki at
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Reference/en/define
is there any bonus when I use \define instead of \def?
Regards,
Vyatcheslav
___
If your question is of interest
Am 18.04.10 21:12, schrieb Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky:
Hello,
Patrick posed a good question on wiki at
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Reference/en/define
is there any bonus when I use \define instead of \def?
1. \define checks if the command you try to create already exists
Hi Hans Aditya
Please be patient as I am not a developer just someone who writes
documents.
I discovered the integral symbols starting at the double integral
are now composed by repeating the normal integral symbol
n-times. However in an earlier email I commented that they didn't
look right
Hi,
How to use definemathcommand to setup some of the missing math symbols ?
Some of these symbols are defined in char-def.lua but missing in
math-vfu.lua.
Thanks
___
If your question is of interest to others as
On 11-4-2010 2:45, gummybears wrote:
Hi,
How to use definemathcommand to setup some of the missing math symbols ?
Some of these symbols are defined in char-def.lua but missing in
math-vfu.lua.
if they are in the regular tex fonts, then we need to extend the vfu ...
keep in mind that the vfu
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009, John Devereux wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to define a tex macro on the context command line (MkII)?
For example:
texexec manual.tex --define Title X99 Operators Manual
so that
\Title
would expand to the appropriate text?
You can do
Hi,
Is it possible to define a tex macro on the context command line (MkII)?
For example:
texexec manual.tex --define Title X99 Operators Manual
so that
\Title
would expand to the appropriate text?
(I know about modes I think)
--
John Devereux
Thank you, Aditya, for help!
My further questions:
Why after={}or after= does not remove the space between enumeration
caption and next paragraph?
For example:
\defineenumeration[exercise][title=yes, text=Вправа, prefix=yes,
prefixset=section, titleleft=, titleright=, after=]
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Thank you, Aditya, for help!
My further questions:
Why after={}or after= does not remove the space between enumeration
caption and next paragraph?
For example:
\defineenumeration[exercise][title=yes, text=Вправа, prefix=yes,
Please, disregard my last question about enumeration setup. Now I know
more and created definition that works fine for me:
\defineenumeration[exercise][title=yes, text=Вправа, prefix=yes,
prefixset=section, titleleft=, titleright=, after=,
inbetween={\blank[medium]}]
The trick is that
Hello Aditya,
Thanks for help again. However, the result is far from OK.
[title=yes, text=Вправа, way=bysection, prefix=yes, width=broad]
I use enumeration within subsubsection, namely 1.3.1. If I put
prefix=yes, the first exercise is 1.3.1.1. That is, it is numbered
within subsubsection,
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 01:31:02PM +0200, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Hello Aditya,
Thanks for help again. However, the result is far from OK.
[title=yes, text=Вправа, way=bysection, prefix=yes, width=broad]
I use enumeration within subsubsection, namely 1.3.1. If I put
prefix=yes, the first
Hello,
I want to be only
ExerciseSectionNumber.ExerciseNumber, like 1.1, 1.2, etc.
You may try prefixset=section.
Thank you, Longmin, for your suggestion, it works! But other problems
persist.
Hans (or someone else who can fix it), please, look into my minimal example:
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Hello,
I want to be only
ExerciseSectionNumber.ExerciseNumber, like 1.1, 1.2, etc.
You may try prefixset=section.
Thank you, Longmin, for your suggestion, it works! But other problems
persist.
Hans (or someone else who can fix it),
Hello,
I need to define a Exercise command that will enumerate exercises and provide
captions.
For example,
\exercise{Conversion from hex to dec}
should produce
Exercise 1.1. Conversion from hex to dec.
What is the best way to achieve that? Use \definehead or another command
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Hello,
I need to define a Exercise command that will enumerate exercises and
provide
captions.
For example,
\exercise{Conversion from hex to dec}
should produce
Exercise 1.1. Conversion from hex to dec.
What is the best way
Hello,
I need to define a Exercise command that will enumerate exercises and
provide captions.
For example,
\exercise{Conversion from hex to dec}
should produce
Exercise 1.1. Conversion from hex to dec.
What is the best way to achieve that? Use \definehead or another command?
Best
is okay:
\starttext
\font\Myfont=/usr/local/share/fonts/d/delicious_roman.otf at 24pt
\Myfont Hello, world
\stoptext
but running
\starttext
\font\Myfont=Delicious-Roman at 24pt
\Myfont Hello, world
\stoptext
leads to
define font | font with name Delicious-Roman
Am 28.05.2009 um 17:59 schrieb Nicolas Girard:
Hi all,
I'm using the latest beta of context minimals, rsynced over a TeXlive
2008 on ubuntu.
[...]
Running the following file is okay:
\starttext
\font\Myfont=/usr/local/share/fonts/d/delicious_roman.otf at 24pt
\Myfont Hello, world
2009/5/28 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com:
Hi Wolfgang,
thanks for such a fast answer !
Am 28.05.2009 um 17:59 schrieb Nicolas Girard:
\starttext
\font\Myfont=Delicious-Roman at 24pt
\Myfont Hello, world
\stoptext
Please don't use \font, use ConTeXt's
Am 28.05.2009 um 18:47 schrieb Nicolas Girard:
Please don't use \font, use ConTeXt's \definefont instead:
OK, but why ? Reading the list, I see that you were still using it six
months ago ; is is deprecated now ?
It's not ConTeXt style.
2009/5/28 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com:
Am 28.05.2009 um 18:47 schrieb Nicolas Girard:
Please don't use \font, use ConTeXt's \definefont instead:
OK, but why ? Reading the list, I see that you were still using it six
months ago ; is is deprecated now ?
It's not
2009/5/28 Nicolas Girard nicolas.gir...@nerim.net:
2009/5/28 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com:
\starttext
\font\Myfont=Delicious-Roman at 24pt
\Myfont Hello, world
\stoptext
Now, I'm trying to make the typescript code from the wiki [1] work
[1]
Am 28.05.2009 um 19:35 schrieb Nicolas Girard:
Now, I'm trying to make the typescript code from the wiki [1] work
[1] http://wiki.contextgarden.net/exljbris_typescript
My test file is as follows:
[...]
\starttypescript [delicious]
\definetypeface [delicious] [ss] [sans] [delicious]
2009/5/28 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com:
Am 28.05.2009 um 19:35 schrieb Nicolas Girard:
Now, I'm trying to make the typescript code from the wiki [1] work
[1] http://wiki.contextgarden.net/exljbris_typescript
My test file is as follows:
[...]
\starttypescript
Dear Hans,
Thank you for your code.
I tested it using ConTeXt and LuaTeX, but I got following error.
(/Users/graph/ConTeXtBeta/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/pdfr-
def.tex)
(./test-lua.tuo)
systems : begin file test-lua at line 2
! Argument of \MyCircledNumber has an
Hi,
It works here with:
This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.40.1-2009050813 (Web2C 7.5.7)
ConTeXt ver: 2009.05.26 17:57 MKIV fmt: 2009.5.26 int: english/
english
KR
Willi
On May 27, 2009, at 3:22 PM, dalyoung wrote:
Dear Hans,
Thank you for your code.
I tested it using ConTeXt and LuaTeX,
dalyoung schrieb:
Dear Hans,
Thank you for your code.
I tested it using ConTeXt and LuaTeX, but I got following error.
(/Users/graph/ConTeXtBeta/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/pdfr-def.tex)
(./test-lua.tuo)
systems : begin file test-lua at line 2
! Argument of
Thank you for the checking.
I typed the text and run it.
At this time, it worked.
There may be a garbage attached during the process of copy and paste.
By the way, is it possible to modify this code to use circled
character a, b, c, ...?
By using the command \sym{symbol}, I may use them,
Dear all,
I'd like to use circled number 1, circled number 2, ... as bullets
of itemized block.
There is an explanation how to define a personal bullet in the manual.
For each \item the same bullet is used. But I want bullets
automatically changed to the next character in unicode table
polytope wrote:
Dear all,
I'd like to use circled number 1, circled number 2, ... as bullets
of itemized block.
There is an explanation how to define a personal bullet in the manual.
For each \item the same bullet is used. But I want bullets
automatically changed to the next character
Am 05.02.2009 um 19:45 schrieb Michael Bynum:
Ah, I think I see. So \define[1]\mysectionhead{\bfa
\WORD{\underbar{#1}}} would also be valid. Is \define a context
equivalent to the \def command for tex? I couldn't find much
documentation on it.
\define is ConTeXt's equivalent to \newcommand
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Arthur Reutenauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but it might make more sense to look into metatables (i assume that you
own the programming in lua book which explains that)
I don't have one :(, I'll take a good at it later.
You really should look into the book, it
variables are only symbols in lua.
they are reference to values (a place in the memory).
On 12/5/08, Zhichu Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Arthur Reutenauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but it might make more sense to look into metatables (i assume that you
own
Zhichu Chen wrote:
Hi,
I'm learning to use luatex these days, one day actually. It's very
interesting. Although reference manuals are available, I still don't
know how to implement my designation.
The thing is, I know there's a self variable for object-oriented
programming, like
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zhichu Chen wrote:
Hi,
I'm learning to use luatex these days, one day actually. It's very
interesting. Although reference manuals are available, I still don't
know how to implement my designation.
The thing is, I know
but it might make more sense to look into metatables (i assume that you
own the programming in lua book which explains that)
I don't have one :(, I'll take a good at it later.
You really should look into the book, it has a whole chapter about
object-oriented programming in Lua, and explains
Hi,
I'm learning to use luatex these days, one day actually. It's very
interesting. Although reference manuals are available, I still don't
know how to implement my designation.
The thing is, I know there's a self variable for object-oriented
programming, like
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008, Yue Wang wrote:
Hi:
\setupinteraction[style=] % default is style=bold
Thank you, Aditya! Previously I was searching command like setupgoto
or some stuffs like that:(
btw, how to link to the specific position instead of go to that page?
if i point to Equation 12, my
The mailing list blocked my mail because the attachment is too big:(
Ummm... I think we should increase the capacity ...
Here is the original message:
I remove the test.pdf, but one can always compile it using the tex
file in the attachment.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008, Yue Wang wrote:
This is called referencing in ConTeXt. You can search the excursion and
the main manual for some more details.
still go to the page, not go to the specific place. see the attachment.
what I want is the feature that can go to certain area in the pdf
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
ConTeXt behaviour is not perfect in this regard. Sometimes the link jumps
higher or lower than the actual section title. But I could never determine
if it was the fault of the pdf viewer or ConTeXt.
annotation areas in pdf are not part of the stream but take place on
Hi:
\setupinteraction[style=] % default is style=bold
Thank you, Aditya! Previously I was searching command like setupgoto
or some stuffs like that:(
btw, how to link to the specific position instead of go to that page?
if i point to Equation 12, my context document will only flow to the
page
Hi:
I don't want bold font for \goto, Where can I change it?
BTW, some users here suggest that maybe we can define a hypperref-like
linkcolor, citecolor, urlcolor in \setupinteraction, I think it will
be a good idea.
Yue Wang
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Yue Wang wrote:
Hi:
I don't want bold font for \goto, Where can I change it?
\setupinteraction[style=] % default is style=bold
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well,
Hi,
For example
\define\somemacro[3]{...}
gets invoked with
\somemacro{#1}{#2}{#3}
How do you get rid of those repeating pesky curly brackets and
invoke a user defined macro with
\somemacro{#1,#2,#3}
instead ? :O)
--
Best,
Alan
* TeX engine = LuaTeX
* ConTeXt minimals ver: 2008.56.06
Am 14.11.2008 um 12:58 schrieb Alan STONE:
Hi,
For example
\define\somemacro[3]{...}
gets invoked with
\somemacro{#1}{#2}{#3}
How do you get rid of those repeating pesky curly brackets and
invoke a user defined macro with
\somemacro{#1,#2,#3}
\starttext
\def\somemacro#1
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Alan STONE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi,
For example
\define\somemacro[3]{...}
gets invoked with
\somemacro{#1}{#2}{#3}
How do you get rid of those repeating pesky curly brackets and
invoke a user defined macro with
\somemacro{#1,#2,#3}
Not what
201 - 300 of 321 matches
Mail list logo
