On 2013-12-01 Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 11:21:30AM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Interestingly, after I patched Sorts Mill (a FontForge fork) to avoid
duplicates[1] I ended up with a ‘dotlessi.sc’ glyph, as it turns out
the font has a dotlessi → regular smallcap i later on, so
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 09:19:26PM +0100, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-12-01 Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 11:21:30AM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Interestingly, after I patched Sorts Mill (a FontForge fork) to avoid
duplicates[1] I ended up with a ‘dotlessi.sc’ glyph, as it
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:35:01PM +0100, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-11-27 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/27/2013 10:20 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/27/2013 9:53 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote:
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 11:21:30AM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
It is not clear to me how FontLab arrived to the dotlessi name from the
GSUB table, but I need to look into the font a bit more closer.
Interestingly, after I patched Sorts Mill (a FontForge fork) to avoid
duplicates[1] I ended up
On 11/27/2013 11:35 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-11-27 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/27/2013 10:20 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/27/2013 9:53 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/27/2013 8:44 PM, Jan
Dear All,
during my attempts to patch the Palatino's dotless 'i' I found that this
font is parsed incorrectly by ConTeXt.
Comparing index/name info of individual glyphs in the font software and
resulting pala.tma file there is the following difference:
Index | Name - font| Name - tma
1110
On 11/27/2013 8:44 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
Dear All,
during my attempts to patch the Palatino's dotless 'i' I found that this
font is parsed incorrectly by ConTeXt.
Comparing index/name info of individual glyphs in the font software and
resulting pala.tma file there is the following
On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/27/2013 8:44 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
during my attempts to patch the Palatino's dotless 'i' I found that
this font is parsed incorrectly by ConTeXt.
Comparing index/name info of individual glyphs in the font software
and resulting pala.tma file
On 11/27/2013 9:53 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/27/2013 8:44 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
during my attempts to patch the Palatino's dotless 'i' I found that
this font is parsed incorrectly by ConTeXt.
Comparing index/name info of individual glyphs in the font
On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/27/2013 9:53 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/27/2013 8:44 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
during my attempts to patch the Palatino's dotless 'i' I found that
this font is parsed incorrectly by ConTeXt.
Comparing index/name
On 11/27/2013 10:20 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/27/2013 9:53 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/27/2013 8:44 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
during my attempts to patch the Palatino's dotless 'i' I found that
this font is parsed
On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/27/2013 10:20 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/27/2013 9:53 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/27/2013 8:44 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
during my attempts to patch the Palatino's dotless 'i' I
On 2013-11-27 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/27/2013 10:20 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/27/2013 9:53 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/27/2013 8:44 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
during my
13 matches
Mail list logo
