Re: [NTG-context] [Index] Indenting long primaries after secondaries
On 3/7/2014 6:54 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2014-02-26 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
when a long primary is preceded with the secondary or tertiary
index entry, the second line is not indented as usual, see
the following example:
\setupregister[balance=no]
\starttext
\index{primary+secondary+tertiary}
\index[primary long]{\dorecurse{5}{primary long }}
\index[primary longer]{\dorecurse{5}{primary longer }} % but this is Ok
\input{tufte}
\completeindex
\stoptext
I've tested this in new beta and the issue is still there...
how is a \dorecurse supposed to get sorted ...
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] [Index] Indenting long primaries after secondaries
On 2014-03-16 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 3/7/2014 6:54 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2014-02-26 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
when a long primary is preceded with the secondary or tertiary
index entry, the second line is not indented as usual, see
the following example:
\setupregister[balance=no]
\starttext
\index{primary+secondary+tertiary}
\index[primary long]{\dorecurse{5}{primary long }}
\index[primary longer]{\dorecurse{5}{primary longer }} % Ok
\input{tufte}
\completeindex
\stoptext
how is a \dorecurse supposed to get sorted ...
That \dorecurse is used in this MWE only to make it shorter. Indeed, this
command confuses the letter grouping procedure so this is the reason why I
specified the sorting key via the bracket syntax [].
I think there is no need to fix this grouping issue (not enough ROI), but if
so, I would expect to resolve the \dorecurse command first and then apply
the grouping/sorting etc.
My main wish is fixing that indentation (or offering any workaround).
Thanks, Jan
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] [Index] Indenting long primaries after secondaries
On 3/16/2014 4:34 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2014-03-16 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 3/7/2014 6:54 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2014-02-26 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
when a long primary is preceded with the secondary or tertiary
index entry, the second line is not indented as usual, see
the following example:
\setupregister[balance=no]
\starttext
\index{primary+secondary+tertiary}
\index[primary long]{\dorecurse{5}{primary long }}
\index[primary longer]{\dorecurse{5}{primary longer }} % Ok
\input{tufte}
\completeindex
\stoptext
how is a \dorecurse supposed to get sorted ...
That \dorecurse is used in this MWE only to make it shorter. Indeed, this
command confuses the letter grouping procedure so this is the reason why I
specified the sorting key via the bracket syntax [].
I think there is no need to fix this grouping issue (not enough ROI), but if
so, I would expect to resolve the \dorecurse command first and then apply
the grouping/sorting etc.
My main wish is fixing that indentation (or offering any workaround).
we get this:
p
primary
secondary
tertiary 1
primary long primary long primary
long primary long primary long 1
primary longer primary longer primary
longer primary longer primary longer
1
getting this:
p
primary
secondary
tertiary 1
primary long primary long primary
long primary long primary long 1
primary longer primary longer primary
longer primary longer primary longer
1
is pretty hard because it would demand postprocessing entries but i
wonder it looks better
\defineprocessor[twolines][style=\aftergroup\hangafter\aftergroup\plustwo]
\setupregister
[balance=no]
\starttext
\index{primary+secondary+tertiary}
\index{twolines-primary long primary long primary long primary
long primary long}
\index{twolines-primary longer primary longer primary longer
primary longer primary longer}
\input{tufte}
\completeindex
\stoptext
assuming that we never change the implementation
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] [Index] Indenting long primaries after secondaries
On 3/16/2014 4:34 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2014-03-16 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 3/7/2014 6:54 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2014-02-26 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
when a long primary is preceded with the secondary or tertiary
index entry, the second line is not indented as usual, see
the following example:
\setupregister[balance=no]
\starttext
\index{primary+secondary+tertiary}
\index[primary long]{\dorecurse{5}{primary long }}
\index[primary longer]{\dorecurse{5}{primary longer }} % Ok
\input{tufte}
\completeindex
\stoptext
how is a \dorecurse supposed to get sorted ...
That \dorecurse is used in this MWE only to make it shorter. Indeed, this
command confuses the letter grouping procedure so this is the reason why I
specified the sorting key via the bracket syntax [].
I think there is no need to fix this grouping issue (not enough ROI), but if
so, I would expect to resolve the \dorecurse command first and then apply
the grouping/sorting etc.
My main wish is fixing that indentation (or offering any workaround).
stylistic variant:
\defineprocessor[twolines][command=\MyStyle]
\unexpanded\def\MyStyle#1%
{\setbox\scratchbox\hbox{#1}%
\scratchdimen\dimexpr\hsize-\leftskip-\hangindent\relax
\ifdim\wd\scratchbox\scratchdimen
\aftergroup\hangafter
\aftergroup\plustwo
\aftergroup\break
\else\ifdim\wd\scratchbox2\scratchdimen
\aftergroup\hangafter
\aftergroup\plustwo
\aftergroup\break
\fi\fi
\unhbox\scratchbox}
\setupregister
[balance=no]
\setupregister
[index:1]
[textstyle=\MyStyle]
\starttext
\index{primary+secondary+tertiary}
\index{twolines-primary long primary long primary long primary
long primary long}
\index{twolines-primary longer primary longer primary longer
primary longer primary longer}
\input{tufte}
\completeindex
\stoptext
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] [Index] Indenting long primaries after secondaries
On 2014-03-16 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 2014-02-26 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
when a long primary is preceded with the secondary or tertiary
index entry, the second line is not indented as usual, see
the following example:
\setupregister[balance=no]
\starttext
\index{primary+secondary+tertiary}
\index[primary long]{\dorecurse{5}{primary long }}
\index[primary longer]{\dorecurse{5}{primary longer }} % Ok
\input{tufte}
\completeindex
\stoptext
My main wish is fixing that indentation (or offering any workaround).
we get this:
p
primary
secondary
tertiary 1
primary long primary long primary
long primary long primary long 1
primary longer primary longer primary
longer primary longer primary longer
1
hmm, I was getting different output in ConTeXt-2014.03.07:
p
primary
secondary
tertiary 1
primary long primary long primary
long primary long primary long 1 (!!! this was not indented)
primary longer primary longer primary
longer primary longer primary longer 1
(or see the screenshot)
I've just updated ConTeXt to 2014.03.16 and now it works as expected!
Thanks a lot!
Jan
long_primary.png
Description: Binary data
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] [Index] Indenting long primaries after secondaries
On 3/16/2014 6:31 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2014-03-16 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 2014-02-26 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
when a long primary is preceded with the secondary or tertiary
index entry, the second line is not indented as usual, see
the following example:
\setupregister[balance=no]
\starttext
\index{primary+secondary+tertiary}
\index[primary long]{\dorecurse{5}{primary long }}
\index[primary longer]{\dorecurse{5}{primary longer }} % Ok
\input{tufte}
\completeindex
\stoptext
My main wish is fixing that indentation (or offering any workaround).
we get this:
p
primary
secondary
tertiary 1
primary long primary long primary
long primary long primary long 1
primary longer primary longer primary
longer primary longer primary longer
1
hmm, I was getting different output in ConTeXt-2014.03.07:
p
primary
secondary
tertiary 1
primary long primary long primary
long primary long primary long 1 (!!! this was not indented)
primary longer primary longer primary
longer primary longer primary longer 1
(or see the screenshot)
I've just updated ConTeXt to 2014.03.16 and now it works as expected!
Thanks a lot!
The register mechanism has been adapted a bit and this was probably a
positive side effect. Some changes:
- using mixed columns
- support for: referencemethod=forward (smaller tuc files)
- more efficient interactive support (esp when no page numbers)
- better keeping entries and subentries together
Apart from that the beta has some (small) speed improvements and there
will be a slightly different index anchoring once the new version of
luatex is available on all platforms.
Also, the beta has slightly different low level implementation of some
of the interactive features (which can result in more efficient pdf
files in some cases). In fact, due to some other changes, pdf files
could be smaller anyway.
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] [Index] Indenting long primaries after secondaries
On 2014-02-26 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
when a long primary is preceded with the secondary or tertiary
index entry, the second line is not indented as usual, see
the following example:
\setupregister[balance=no]
\starttext
\index{primary+secondary+tertiary}
\index[primary long]{\dorecurse{5}{primary long }}
\index[primary longer]{\dorecurse{5}{primary longer }} % but this is Ok
\input{tufte}
\completeindex
\stoptext
I've tested this in new beta and the issue is still there...
Jan
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
[NTG-context] [Index] Indenting long primaries after secondaries
Dear All,
when a long primary is preceded with the secondary or tertiary index entry,
the second line is not indented as usual, see the following example:
\setupregister[balance=no]
\starttext
\index{primary+secondary+tertiary}
\index[primary long]{\dorecurse{5}{primary long }}
\index[primary longer]{\dorecurse{5}{primary longer }} % but this is Ok
\input{tufte}
\completeindex
\stoptext
How can I avoid this?
Thanks, Jan
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
