On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>>> In principle a cleaner implementation is possible in luatex (without
>>> using
>>> active characters), but I am not completely sure about this. It will be
>>> better to handle this as part of \mnum macro.
>>>
>> Hm, can you explain this a b
In principle a cleaner implementation is possible in luatex (without using
active characters), but I am not completely sure about this. It will be
better to handle this as part of \mnum macro.
Hm, can you explain this a bit ?
Currently ConTeXt already checks if '.' is part of a complete number
that would be very useful for sets and german decimals: $x = 1,33$ vs. $x ∈
{1, 2, 3, 4}$
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
>> http://tug.org/pracjourn/2011-1/beccari.html
>
> Short summary: This allows the comma in $1, 2, 3$ to be have as punctuation
> comma (similar to \setupmathematics[autopunct=no]) and
> $1,23$ t
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
http://tug.org/pracjourn/2011-1/beccari.html
Short summary: This allows the comma in $1, 2, 3$ to be have as
punctuation comma (similar to \setupmathematics[autopunct=no]) and
$1,23$ to behave as decimal comma (similar to
\setupmatematics[autopunct
http://tug.org/pracjourn/2011-1/beccari.html
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpa
