Re: [NTG-context] [dev-context] integrating context mkiv, luatex, and fmtutil, mktexlsr, etc

2007-10-03 Thread Norbert Preining
On Mi, 03 Okt 2007, Hans Hagen wrote: > formats go to the paths defined in texmf.cnf (TEXFORMATS) and the > filedatabses go alongside the ls-R files, so basically it then behaves > like any other tex ??? "file databases go alongside the ls-R files" what do you mean? I thought the stuff generate

Re: [NTG-context] [dev-context] integrating context mkiv, luatex, and fmtutil, mktexlsr, etc

2007-10-03 Thread Hans Hagen
Norbert Preining wrote: > On Mi, 03 Okt 2007, Hans Hagen wrote: >> formats go to the paths defined in texmf.cnf (TEXFORMATS) and the >> filedatabses go alongside the ls-R files, so basically it then behaves >> like any other tex > > ??? "file databases go alongside the ls-R files" what do you m

Re: [NTG-context] [dev-context] integrating context mkiv, luatex, and fmtutil, mktexlsr, etc

2007-10-03 Thread Hans Hagen
Norbert Preining wrote: > Are these megabytes kept and are they useful for later runs? If yes, > then it is ok to put them in a separate cache (I assume the stuff is > useful, it is the font stuff). not sure yet, maybe later; but there is a cache cleaner (i may even thrash by date and usage) >

Re: [NTG-context] [dev-context] integrating context mkiv, luatex, and fmtutil, mktexlsr, etc

2007-10-03 Thread Norbert Preining
HI Hans! On Mi, 03 Okt 2007, Hans Hagen wrote: > >database for luatex. But it is placed NOT alongside the ls-R files, > >right? > > well, "TEXMFSHARECACHE=yes" makes sure that it is put in the same path > as the ls-r file Ah, ok, that is with the new context you created today. No, didn't test t