On 8/18/2016 6:30 PM, Brian R. Landy wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8/18/2016 1:12 AM, Brian R. Landy wrote:
On Aug 17, 2016, at 5:45 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8/17/2016 9:56 PM, Brian R. Landy wrote:
Hi, I was wondering if there is a way to call \getscaledglyph to
scal
On 8/18/2016 6:30 PM, Brian R. Landy wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8/18/2016 1:12 AM, Brian R. Landy wrote:
On Aug 17, 2016, at 5:45 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8/17/2016 9:56 PM, Brian R. Landy wrote:
Hi, I was wondering if there is a way to call \getscaledglyph to
scal
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8/18/2016 1:12 AM, Brian R. Landy wrote:
On Aug 17, 2016, at 5:45 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8/17/2016 9:56 PM, Brian R. Landy wrote:
Hi, I was wondering if there is a way to call \getscaledglyph to
scale a
glyph only horizontally, leaving the hei
On 8/18/2016 1:12 AM, Brian R. Landy wrote:
On Aug 17, 2016, at 5:45 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8/17/2016 9:56 PM, Brian R. Landy wrote:
Hi, I was wondering if there is a way to call \getscaledglyph to scale a
glyph only horizontally, leaving the height untouched? Or maybe an
alternate comman
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 5:45 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 8/17/2016 9:56 PM, Brian R. Landy wrote:
>> Hi, I was wondering if there is a way to call \getscaledglyph to scale a
>> glyph only horizontally, leaving the height untouched? Or maybe an
>> alternate command?
>>
>> I can sort of accomplis
On 8/17/2016 9:56 PM, Brian R. Landy wrote:
Hi, I was wondering if there is a way to call \getscaledglyph to scale a
glyph only horizontally, leaving the height untouched? Or maybe an
alternate command?
I can sort of accomplish this with (for example)
\scale[sx=0.75,sy=1.0]{}{A}, but that enclo
Hi, I was wondering if there is a way to call \getscaledglyph to scale a
glyph only horizontally, leaving the height untouched? Or maybe an
alternate command?
I can sort of accomplish this with (for example)
\scale[sx=0.75,sy=1.0]{}{A}, but that encloses the glyph in an \hbox,
which can be p
> -Original Message-
> From: ntg-context-boun...@ntg.nl [mailto:ntg-context-boun...@ntg.nl] On
> Behalf Of Hans Hagen
> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 9:50 AM
> To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
> Subject: Re: [NTG-context] \getscaledglyph
>
> On 20-1-2011 11:
On 20-1-2011 11:25, Thomas Floeren wrote:
Thank you, Willi, I wasn't aware of this nice font module!
(btw, running it on ArialUnicode with 2 columns and 10pt produces 500 PDF pages
and a peak memory usage of 1.2 GB!).
I like the idea of using glyph names rather than unicode numbers. For my actu
Thank you, Willi, I wasn't aware of this nice font module!
(btw, running it on ArialUnicode with 2 columns and 10pt produces 500 PDF pages
and a peak memory usage of 1.2 GB!).
I like the idea of using glyph names rather than unicode numbers. For my actual
purpose your suggestion works perfectly,
Hi Thomas,
I had to do some work with regard to this issue recently.
What was mentioned on this list, is, that \fontchar is a command which will
stay.
\setupbodyfont[Myfont,rm,12pt]
\definesymbol[Q.alt] [\fontchar{Q.alt}]
\def\Qa{\symbol[Q.alt]}
The easiest way to get a stable environment is
Hi,
I did a rather huge update step from my working context 2010.09.29 to the
actual beta. I noted that \getscaledglyph doesn’t work anymore.
I use it a lot for symbol insertions like this:
\definefontsynonym [ArialU] [name:ArialUnicodeMS]
\definesymbol [Diameter] [\getscaledglyph{1.5}{ArialU}
12 matches
Mail list logo