Re: [NTG-context] \indenting[next] and math = no vertical space before the formula
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:49 AM, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Mikael Persson wrote:
Hello again,
* snip *
I could reproduce the result and have also a fix but I don't know what
the correct
reults should be and other people like Aditya should decide if it makes
sense
to change the current behaviour.
\def\startdisplaymath
{\ifgridsnapping
\beforedisplayspace
\snapmathtogrid\vbox
* snip *
Wolfgang
This fix seems not to solve the problem entirely. With this fix
applied, If one now put a formula inside an enumeration one gets
double space before the formula. This is a test file that shows the
problem:
This is basically because in enumerations indenting is set to never.
You can see the same affect with
\setupindenting[no]
\testtext
One possible fix is to add
indenting=(reset|next|first) %default is never
to the \setupenumeration command. For example
\defineenumeration[example]
[text=Example,
location=serried,
width=fit,
indenting=reset, %% Add This
distance=0.5em,
way=bysection,
]
Another is to change \startdisplaymath to
\def\startdisplaymath
{\ifgridsnapping
\beforedisplayspace
\snapmathtogrid\vbox
\bgroup
\informulatrue
%\forgetall % breaks side floats
\else
\bgroup
\parskip\formulaparskip % ! !
\informulatrue
%\forgetall % otherwise backgrounds fail
\ifdim\lastskip\zeropoint\else
\par
\ifvmode \ifdim\parskip\zeropoint\relax
\whitespace \vskip-\parskip % kind of forces and cancels again
\fi \fi
\fi
\doif\displaygridcorrection{-\v!top}{\kern-\strutht}% new, currently
only option/default
\beforedisplayspace
\par
\ifvmode \ifdim\parskip\zeropoint\relax \else
\ifindentfirstparagraph
\verticalstrut
\vskip-\struttotal
\vskip-\baselineskip
\fi\fi
\fi
\fi
$$\setdisplaydimensions
\setpredisplaysize\lastlinewidth
\startinnermath}
But this is getting ugly.
Aditya
Thank you Aditya, but I don't get that to work. Both with
ConTeXt ver: 2007.04.03 13:01 MKII fmt: 2008.4.24 int:
english/english (with the fix earlier in this thread)
and
ConTeXt ver: 2007.09.28 16:52 MKII fmt: 2008.4.24 int:
english/english (which is the one from new ubuntu, without the fix)
this fails with the following error msg:
%% Start error msg
! Illegal unit of measure (pt inserted).
to be read again
\chardef
\@@in:reset ...rue \parindent \zerocount \chardef
\indentingtoggle \zerocount
\next1 #1,-\docomplexsetupindentingB {#1}
\doprocesscommaitem
\doprocesscommalist ...item \gobbleoneargument #1,
]\relax \global \advance \...
argument ...ndenting ]\docomplexsetupindentingB
\checkeverypar \ifindentfi...
\firstofoneargument #1-#1
...
l.29 \testexpr
% Too much space before the formula if the fix is applied,
?
%% Stop error msg
The file that gives that error is:
%% Begin file
\setupindenting[yes,small]
\indenting[next]
\def\testtext{This is just some text so we see better what happens.}
\def\testexpr{%
\par
\testtext
\startformula
f(x)= \sin(x)
\stopformula
\testtext
\par
}
\defineenumeration[example]
[text=Example,
location=serried,
width=fit,
indenting=reset,
distance=0.5em,
way=bysection,
]
\starttext
\testexpr % OK if fix is applied, otherwise to little space before the
formula
\startexample
\testexpr % Too much space before the formula if the fix is applied,
otherwise OK.
\stopexample
\stoptext
%% End file
Best regards, Micke P
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] \indenting[next] and math = no vertical space before the formula
Thank you Aditya, but I don't get that to work. Both with ConTeXt ver: 2007.04.03 13:01 MKII fmt: 2008.4.24 int: english/english (with the fix earlier in this thread) and ConTeXt ver: 2007.09.28 16:52 MKII fmt: 2008.4.24 int: english/english (which is the one from new ubuntu, without the fix) Update your ConTeXt istallation, both systems use old versions. Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \indenting[next] and math = no vertical space before the formula
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Wolfgang Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you Aditya, but I don't get that to work. Both with ConTeXt ver: 2007.04.03 13:01 MKII fmt: 2008.4.24 int: english/english (with the fix earlier in this thread) and ConTeXt ver: 2007.09.28 16:52 MKII fmt: 2008.4.24 int: english/english (which is the one from new ubuntu, without the fix) Update your ConTeXt istallation, both systems use old versions. Wolfgang I wish I could. I cant even run the new version from ubuntu, since there is some problem with the fourier fonts, explained in an earlier mail in this thread (and also in an earlier post: http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20070830.154143.005528b8.en.html ) And new minimals seem not to include the fourier fonts. If I set indenting=next (or first) in the enumeration, the file compiles... Sorry for complaining about old versions of ConTeXt. I am finishing my PhD thesis, and have not found any nice combinations of text and math fonts in the new minimals. (I am not too fond of the lm fonts). If you have a tip about such fonts, please tell me :) Micke P ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \indenting[next] and math = no vertical space before the formula
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Mikael Persson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Wolfgang Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you Aditya, but I don't get that to work. Both with ConTeXt ver: 2007.04.03 13:01 MKII fmt: 2008.4.24 int: english/english (with the fix earlier in this thread) and ConTeXt ver: 2007.09.28 16:52 MKII fmt: 2008.4.24 int: english/english (which is the one from new ubuntu, without the fix) Update your ConTeXt istallation, both systems use old versions. Wolfgang I wish I could. I cant even run the new version from ubuntu, since there is some problem with the fourier fonts, explained in an earlier mail in this thread (and also in an earlier post: http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20070830.154143.005528b8.en.html) No solution for this problem. And new minimals seem not to include the fourier fonts. If I set indenting=next (or first) in the enumeration, the file compiles... Sorry for complaining about old versions of ConTeXt. I am finishing my PhD thesis, and have not found any nice combinations of text and math fonts in the new minimals. (I am not too fond of the lm fonts). If you have a tip about such fonts, please tell me :) You don't have update your complete installation, cont-tmf.zip is enough for a new version but you also need the latest version of the latin modern fonts. Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \indenting[next] and math = no vertical space before the formula
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Mikael Persson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:49 AM, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Mikael Persson wrote:
Hello again,
* snip *
I could reproduce the result and have also a fix but I don't know what
the correct
reults should be and other people like Aditya should decide if it makes
sense
to change the current behaviour.
\def\startdisplaymath
{\ifgridsnapping
\beforedisplayspace
\snapmathtogrid\vbox
* snip *
Wolfgang
This fix seems not to solve the problem entirely. With this fix
applied, If one now put a formula inside an enumeration one gets
double space before the formula. This is a test file that shows the
problem:
This is basically because in enumerations indenting is set to never.
You can see the same affect with
\setupindenting[no]
\testtext
One possible fix is to add
indenting=(reset|next|first) %default is never
to the \setupenumeration command. For example
\defineenumeration[example]
[text=Example,
location=serried,
width=fit,
indenting=reset, %% Add This
distance=0.5em,
way=bysection,
]
Another is to change \startdisplaymath to
\def\startdisplaymath
{\ifgridsnapping
\beforedisplayspace
\snapmathtogrid\vbox
\bgroup
\informulatrue
%\forgetall % breaks side floats
\else
\bgroup
\parskip\formulaparskip % ! !
\informulatrue
%\forgetall % otherwise backgrounds fail
\ifdim\lastskip\zeropoint\else
\par
\ifvmode \ifdim\parskip\zeropoint\relax
\whitespace \vskip-\parskip % kind of forces and cancels again
\fi \fi
\fi
\doif\displaygridcorrection{-\v!top}{\kern-\strutht}% new, currently
only option/default
\beforedisplayspace
\par
\ifvmode \ifdim\parskip\zeropoint\relax \else
\ifindentfirstparagraph
\verticalstrut
\vskip-\struttotal
\vskip-\baselineskip
\fi\fi
\fi
\fi
$$\setdisplaydimensions
\setpredisplaysize\lastlinewidth
\startinnermath}
But this is getting ugly.
Aditya
Thank you Aditya, but I don't get that to work. Both with
ConTeXt ver: 2007.04.03 13:01 MKII fmt: 2008.4.24 int:
english/english (with the fix earlier in this thread)
and
ConTeXt ver: 2007.09.28 16:52 MKII fmt: 2008.4.24 int:
english/english (which is the one from new ubuntu, without the fix)
this fails with the following error msg:
%% Start error msg
! Illegal unit of measure (pt inserted).
to be read again
\chardef
\@@in:reset ...rue \parindent \zerocount \chardef
\indentingtoggle \zerocount
\next1 #1,-\docomplexsetupindentingB {#1}
\doprocesscommaitem
\doprocesscommalist ...item \gobbleoneargument #1,
]\relax \global \advance \...
argument ...ndenting ]\docomplexsetupindentingB
\checkeverypar \ifindentfi...
\firstofoneargument #1-#1
An old bug (more than two month old :)
Also add this
\unprotect
\defineindentingmethod [\v!reset] {\indentfirstparagraphtrue
\parindent\zeropoint%AM was \zerocount
\chardef\indentingtoggle\zerocount}
\protect
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] \indenting[next] and math = no vertical space before the formula
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Mikael Persson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:49 AM, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Mikael Persson wrote:
Hello again,
* snip *
I could reproduce the result and have also a fix but I don't know what
the correct
reults should be and other people like Aditya should decide if it
makes sense
to change the current behaviour.
\def\startdisplaymath
{\ifgridsnapping
\beforedisplayspace
\snapmathtogrid\vbox
* snip *
Wolfgang
This fix seems not to solve the problem entirely. With this fix
applied, If one now put a formula inside an enumeration one gets
double space before the formula. This is a test file that shows the
problem:
This is basically because in enumerations indenting is set to never.
You can see the same affect with
\setupindenting[no]
\testtext
One possible fix is to add
indenting=(reset|next|first) %default is never
to the \setupenumeration command. For example
\defineenumeration[example]
[text=Example,
location=serried,
width=fit,
indenting=reset, %% Add This
distance=0.5em,
way=bysection,
]
Another is to change \startdisplaymath to
\def\startdisplaymath
{\ifgridsnapping
\beforedisplayspace
\snapmathtogrid\vbox
\bgroup
\informulatrue
%\forgetall % breaks side floats
\else
\bgroup
\parskip\formulaparskip % ! !
\informulatrue
%\forgetall % otherwise backgrounds fail
\ifdim\lastskip\zeropoint\else
\par
\ifvmode \ifdim\parskip\zeropoint\relax
\whitespace \vskip-\parskip % kind of forces and cancels again
\fi \fi
\fi
\doif\displaygridcorrection{-\v!top}{\kern-\strutht}% new,
currently only option/default
\beforedisplayspace
\par
\ifvmode \ifdim\parskip\zeropoint\relax \else
\ifindentfirstparagraph
\verticalstrut
\vskip-\struttotal
\vskip-\baselineskip
\fi\fi
\fi
\fi
$$\setdisplaydimensions
\setpredisplaysize\lastlinewidth
\startinnermath}
But this is getting ugly.
Aditya
Thank you Aditya, but I don't get that to work. Both with
ConTeXt ver: 2007.04.03 13:01 MKII fmt: 2008.4.24 int:
english/english (with the fix earlier in this thread)
and
ConTeXt ver: 2007.09.28 16:52 MKII fmt: 2008.4.24 int:
english/english (which is the one from new ubuntu, without the fix)
this fails with the following error msg:
%% Start error msg
! Illegal unit of measure (pt inserted).
to be read again
\chardef
\@@in:reset ...rue \parindent \zerocount \chardef
\indentingtoggle
\zerocount
\next1 #1,-\docomplexsetupindentingB {#1}
\doprocesscommaitem
\doprocesscommalist ...item \gobbleoneargument #1,
]\relax \global \advance
\...
argument ...ndenting ]\docomplexsetupindentingB
\checkeverypar
\ifindentfi...
\firstofoneargument #1-#1
An old bug (more than two month old :)
Also add this
\unprotect
\defineindentingmethod [\v!reset] {\indentfirstparagraphtrue
\parindent\zeropoint%AM was \zerocount
\chardef\indentingtoggle\zerocount}
\protect
Aditya
Thank you Aditya (and also thank you Wolfgang!) Your help is really appreciated!
Micke P
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] \indenting[next] and math = no vertical space before the formula
Hello again,
* snip *
I could reproduce the result and have also a fix but I don't know what
the correct
reults should be and other people like Aditya should decide if it makes sense
to change the current behaviour.
\def\startdisplaymath
{\ifgridsnapping
\beforedisplayspace
\snapmathtogrid\vbox
* snip *
Wolfgang
This fix seems not to solve the problem entirely. With this fix
applied, If one now put a formula inside an enumeration one gets
double space before the formula. This is a test file that shows the
problem:
%%% Test file
\setupindenting[yes,small]
\indenting[next]
\def\testtext{This is just some text so we see better what happens.}
\def\testexpr{%
\par
\testtext
\startformula
f(x)= \sin(x)
\stopformula
\testtext
\par
}
\defineenumeration[example]
[text=Example,
location=serried,
width=fit,
distance=0.5em,
way=bysection,
]
\starttext
\testexpr % OK if fix is applied, otherwise to little space before the formula
\startexample
\testexpr % Too much space before the formula if the fix is applied,
otherwise OK.
\stopexample
\stoptext
%%% Stop testfile
Best regards, Micke P
PS Hans, I save the timing testing for next time I try LuaTeX.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
[NTG-context] \indenting[next] and math = no vertical space before the formula
Dear all, I have a problem with \indenting[next] combined with math formulas. Look at the example below. The space between the text above the formula and the formula is way to small. This goes away if I change next to for example yes. Btw, this happens on my TeXLive 2007 on ubuntu at home, my ConTeXt minimal from 2007-04-03 at work and on live.contextgarden.net (with pdfTeX but not LuaTeX). Do I misuse the indenting macros? Thanks, Micke P % test file \setupindenting[yes,small] \indenting[next] \starttext Hello World! This is just some dumb text to show the problem. \startformula a=b \stopformula Goodbye World! The space below the formula is OK. \stoptext ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \indenting[next] and math = no vertical space before the formula
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Mikael Persson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
I have a problem with \indenting[next] combined with math formulas.
Look at the example below. The space between the text above the
formula and the formula is way to small. This goes away if I change
next to for example yes.
Btw, this happens on my TeXLive 2007 on ubuntu at home, my ConTeXt
minimal from 2007-04-03 at work and on live.contextgarden.net (with
pdfTeX but not LuaTeX).
Do I misuse the indenting macros?
Thanks, Micke P
% test file
\setupindenting[yes,small]
\indenting[next]
\starttext
Hello World! This is just some dumb text to show the problem.
\startformula
a=b
\stopformula
Goodbye World! The space below the formula is OK.
\stoptext
I could reproduce the result and have also a fix but I don't know what
the correct
reults should be and other people like Aditya should decide if it makes sense
to change the current behaviour.
\def\startdisplaymath
{\ifgridsnapping
\beforedisplayspace
\snapmathtogrid\vbox
\bgroup
\informulatrue
%\forgetall % breaks side floats
\else
\bgroup
\parskip\formulaparskip % ! !
\informulatrue
%\forgetall % otherwise backgrounds fail
\ifdim\lastskip\zeropoint\else
\par
\ifvmode \ifdim\parskip\zeropoint\relax
\whitespace \vskip-\parskip % kind of forces and cancels again
\fi \fi
\fi
\doif\displaygridcorrection{-\v!top}{\kern-\strutht}% new,
currently only option/default
\beforedisplayspace
\par
\ifvmode
\ifindentfirstparagraph
\verticalstrut
\vskip-\struttotal
\vskip-\baselineskip
\fi
\fi
\fi
$$\setdisplaydimensions
\setpredisplaysize\lastlinewidth
\startinnermath}
I added the \ifindentfirstparagraph test before the last skip
upwards is executed.
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] \indenting[next] and math = no vertical space before the formula
Aditya Mahajan wrote: Hans, if you agree with Wolfgang's fix, I think it should be included in core-mat. i just wait till you send me a core-mat with fixes .. fixing whitespace is always a bit tricky ... test with/without whitespace as well as with grids Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \indenting[next] and math = no vertical space before the formula
Thank you Wolfgang, Aditya and Hans for your kind answers. Today the new ubuntu was released, and I did upgrade. That was not too smart: With the newer TeXLive in ubuntu 8.04 came an updated ConTeXt which gave me the problem explained in http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20070830.154143.005528b8.en.html again. Since I am finishing my PhD thesis and really want to use the utopia+fourier fonts, I downgraded to an old ConTeXt minimal for now. I have not managed to get Wolfgang's solution to work (just tried to copy that definition to my file, and that did not change the vertical space. I will try to make the change in core-mat.tex now). However, some questions remain: 1) I also tried the new context minimal with LuaTeX (to see if it worked better there) and found out that the fourier fonts are not included in the minimals anymore. Are there any plans to include them? Or to make some kind of package with these and other nice free fonts? 2) Will the problem from http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20070830.154143.005528b8.en.html go away in the near future (of new versions)? From the answers to that question I did not really get if the problem was a big one or not. Best Regards, Micke P PS I am impressed by the speed of LuaTeX. It compiled my document in ~20s instead of 1-2 minutes. On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aditya Mahajan wrote: Hans, if you agree with Wolfgang's fix, I think it should be included in core-mat. i just wait till you send me a core-mat with fixes .. fixing whitespace is always a bit tricky ... test with/without whitespace as well as with grids Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \indenting[next] and math = no vertical space before the formula
First, thank you Wolfgang, I tried to change it in the core-mat.tex and it looks great now! 1) I also tried the new context minimal with LuaTeX (to see if it worked better there) and found out that the fourier fonts are not included in the minimals anymore. Are there any plans to include them? Or to make some kind of package with these and other nice free fonts? mojca will look into it (out of reach, mail etc now) since it came up last week sounds great! 2) Will the problem from http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20070830.154143.005528b8.en.html go away in the near future (of new versions)? From the answers to that question I did not really get if the problem was a big one or not. depends on who wants to fix it -) I don't know what to do (and I am not a programmer), but if there is some monkey-see-monkey-do work, I am happy to help. PS I am impressed by the speed of LuaTeX. It compiled my document in ~20s instead of 1-2 minutes. Due to mplib or in general? Some parts of mkiv can still be sped up, e.g. xml processing, but there's not that much more to gain in font handling (that is ... we're playing with runtime mp fonts and there we can gain a lot when the new img related features show up). Also, some mechanisms will be reimplemented and as such be sped up. Hm, I hoped you would tell me why ;) The document is a math document with a lot of references, 5 different bibliographies. But no MetaPost graphics, just plain text + formulas. It is about 100 pages at the moment. Could it maybe be the fact that I am changing font? With LuaTeX I was using the lm fonts. I have a feeling it takes a bit longer to load other fonts, but that might just be a feeling from what is written in the terminal? Micke P ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \indenting[next] and math = no vertical space before the formula
Mikael Persson wrote:
First, thank you Wolfgang, I tried to change it in the core-mat.tex
and it looks great now!
1) I also tried the new context minimal with LuaTeX (to see if it
worked better there) and found out that the fourier fonts are not
included in the minimals anymore. Are there any plans to include them?
Or to make some kind of package with these and other nice free fonts?
mojca will look into it (out of reach, mail etc now) since it came up
last week
sounds great!
2) Will the problem from
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20070830.154143.005528b8.en.html
go away in the near future (of new versions)? From the answers to that
question I did not really get if the problem was a big one or not.
depends on who wants to fix it -)
I don't know what to do (and I am not a programmer), but if there is
some monkey-see-monkey-do work, I am happy to help.
PS I am impressed by the speed of LuaTeX. It compiled my document in
~20s instead of 1-2 minutes.
Due to mplib or in general? Some parts of mkiv can still be sped up,
e.g. xml processing, but there's not that much more to gain in font
handling (that is ... we're playing with runtime mp fonts and there we
can gain a lot when the new img related features show up). Also, some
mechanisms will be reimplemented and as such be sped up.
Hm, I hoped you would tell me why ;)
The document is a math document with a lot of references, 5 different
bibliographies. But no MetaPost graphics, just plain text + formulas.
It is about 100 pages at the moment. Could it maybe be the fact that I
am changing font? With LuaTeX I was using the lm fonts. I have a
feeling it takes a bit longer to load other fonts, but that might just
be a feeling from what is written in the terminal?
mkiv needs less fonts but they may be bigger (more glyphs)
at the end of a run you see the statistics, just write them down
occasionally so that we can see the improvements
other reasons can be that some mem bugs have been removed over time adn
that mkiv share more data, so that overall less memory is needed which
in turn gives less garbage collection
try adding
\usemodule[timing]
to the top of the doc and one or more
\ShowUsage {}
\ShowMemoryUsage{}
\ShowNodeUsage {}
at the end ... it generates some pictures that show what takes most time
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
