Re: [NTG-context] \mathematics might be missing \everymathematics

2019-02-25 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/25/2019 9:47 PM, Henri Menke wrote: Bump i'll catch it (no uploads today) On 19/02/19 10:02 PM, Henri Menke wrote: Dear Hans, In the following example I want to locally set lcgreek=normal but it is not picked up because the attribute is not propagated. When I enter \everymathematics

Re: [NTG-context] \mathematics might be missing \everymathematics

2019-02-25 Thread Henri Menke
Bump On 19/02/19 10:02 PM, Henri Menke wrote: > Dear Hans, > > In the following example I want to locally set lcgreek=normal but it is > not picked up because the attribute is not propagated. When I enter > \everymathematics manually it works fine. Is this by design or is this > a bug? MWE

[NTG-context] \mathematics might be missing \everymathematics

2019-02-19 Thread Henri Menke
Dear Hans, In the following example I want to locally set lcgreek=normal but it is not picked up because the attribute is not propagated. When I enter \everymathematics manually it works fine. Is this by design or is this a bug? MWE below. Cheers, Henri --- \starttext The greek letter

[NTG-context] Mathematics (\lim, \int, ...)

2013-10-08 Thread Alan BRASLAU
Is something gone funny with mathematics? \starttext $\lim_1^2$ $\int_1^2$ \stoptext Undefined control sequence ... 1 \starttext 2 $\lim_1^2$ 3 4 $\int_1^2$ 5 \stoptext 6 recently read \lim_ l.2 $\lim_ 1^2$ ? ! Undefined control sequence. 1

Re: [NTG-context] Mathematics (\lim, \int, ...)

2013-10-08 Thread Marco Patzer
On 2013–10–08 Alan BRASLAU wrote: Is something gone funny with mathematics? http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context/84607/focus=84616 It was a bug which has been fixed in the current beta. Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [NTG-context] (mathematics) Stretching Unicode big operator

2013-06-24 Thread Hans Hagen
On 6/22/2013 10:45 PM, Sander Maijers wrote: If I decide to use, for instance, Σ instead of \sum, this operator is no longer stretched/scaling regardless of the sub/superscripts specified tot it. Is it possible to keep stretching/scaling while using Inicode characters for such operators? This

[NTG-context] (mathematics) Stretching Unicode big operator

2013-06-22 Thread Sander Maijers
If I decide to use, for instance, Σ instead of \sum, this operator is no longer stretched/scaling regardless of the sub/superscripts specified tot it. Is it possible to keep stretching/scaling while using Inicode characters for such operators?

[NTG-context] \mathematics

2006-08-14 Thread Boris Tschirschwitz
Hi.When writing math I like avoiding $ whenever possible by defining my math operators with \mathematics, e.g.\def\grp{\mathematics{G}}.So far I was using this like I use \EnsureMath in LaTeX, but now I'm running into problems in MPgraphics: Texexec compiles the following file fine until I add the

Re: [NTG-context] \mathematics

2006-08-14 Thread taco hoekwater
Boris Tschirschwitz wrote: Hi. When writing math I like avoiding $ whenever possible by defining my math operators with \mathematics, e.g. \def\grp{\mathematics{G}}. So far I was using this like I use \EnsureMath in LaTeX, but now I'm running into problems in MPgraphics: Texexec

Re: [NTG-context] \mathematics

2006-08-14 Thread Boris Tschirschwitz
Cool, it works nicely here, too.Thanks,Boris.On 8/14/06, taco hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Boris Tschirschwitz wrote: Hi. When writing math I like avoiding $ whenever possible by defining my math operators with \mathematics, e.g. \def\grp{\mathematics{G}}. So far I was using this like I use