On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
Apparently not, again for some reason I'd always the feeling that they
are not interested in feedback
I wonder how you got that feeling if you never made contact with
them...
I'm still wondering too.
On 13-4-2010 8:07, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Apparently not, again for some reason I'd always the feeling that they
are not interested in feedback (I also usually try to provide fixes with
my bug reports, but I can't really do here).
If you'd met them in person you'd probably written your mails
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 04:21:27PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 13-4-2010 8:07, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Apparently not, again for some reason I'd always the feeling that they
are not interested in feedback (I also usually try to provide fixes with
my bug reports, but I can't really do here).
but for several personal reasons I can't join any
of the international TeX user groups
I don't know what your reasons are, but you realize that you can't
blame the user groups for your not wanting to join, right? TUG sends
its publication worldwide at its own expenses,
On 13-4-2010 12:58, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:41:59PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 12-4-2010 9:43, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:23:02PM +0200, Marco wrote:
With MkIV \cap and \nocap is no longer necessary when you have a
opentype font
with the smcp
this is not the place to elaborate on this (more for the usual font bof
session at bachotek) but to some extend it's a packaging issue: why a
full smallcaps embedded but not an italic
Actually, you can do that with OpenType: there is an 'ital' feature,
and using it would allow to embed
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:13:49PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 13-4-2010 12:58, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:41:59PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 12-4-2010 9:43, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:23:02PM +0200, Marco wrote:
With MkIV \cap and \nocap is no longer
I don't go to TeX conferences, so mailing lists is the only place I can
discuss such stuff, and TeX Gyre fonts don't have a mailing list, AFAIK.
You can write to the TeX Gyre team...
Arthur
___
If your
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:48:27PM +0200, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
this is not the place to elaborate on this (more for the usual font bof
session at bachotek) but to some extend it's a packaging issue: why a
full smallcaps embedded but not an italic
Actually, you can do that with
Am 12.04.10 21:23, schrieb Marco:
With MkIV \cap and \nocap is no longer necessary when you have a
opentype font
with the smcp (smallcapitals) and c2sc (capitals to smallcapitals)
features.
Thanks for your explanation. But why doesn't your example work with the
latin modern fonts? Don't
On 13-4-2010 12:48, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
this is not the place to elaborate on this (more for the usual font bof
session at bachotek) but to some extend it's a packaging issue: why a
full smallcaps embedded but not an italic
Actually, you can do that with OpenType: there is an 'ital'
italic correction or italic alternates?
Italic alternates.
http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/features_fj.htm#ital
Arthur
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an
On 13-4-2010 1:03, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Fontforge in script mode does not require X, mingw is enough, and AFAIK
latest FF CVS can be compiled under mingw without patching. One can
always run FF under some virtual machine etc. But to run Windows I need
a Windows license which I cannot afford.
On 13-4-2010 1:54, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
italic correction or italic alternates?
Italic alternates.
http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/features_fj.htm#ital
interesting is that combining them in one font can help kerning although
kerning in cjk is not much of an issue
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 02:00:39PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 13-4-2010 1:03, Khaled Hosny wrote:
They already shipped glyphs with such poor artistic value, being in the
Ghostscript fonts is not an excuse, they could have resorted to the
original URW fonts, which were released under GPL, from
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 01:06:47PM +0200, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
I don't go to TeX conferences, so mailing lists is the only place I can
discuss such stuff, and TeX Gyre fonts don't have a mailing list, AFAIK.
You can write to the TeX Gyre team...
And their contact info is listed in...
On Apr 13, 2010, at 7:16 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
BTW, I just checked ghostscript fonts shipped with my distro and they
don't have any of the crappy Greek glyphs TeX Gyre have (neither do the
files linked from TeX Gyre web page), so I don't know from where TeX
Gyre got those.
I contacted
Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 01:06:47PM +0200, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
I don't go to TeX conferences, so mailing lists is the only place I can
discuss such stuff, and TeX Gyre fonts don't have a mailing list, AFAIK.
You can write to the TeX Gyre team...
And their contact
And their contact info is listed in... ?
The TeX Gyre page starts with a list of names. And the first paper in
the Readings section lists e-mail addresses. Have you tried
contacting them?
Arthur
___
If
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 07:33:22PM +0200, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 7:16 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
BTW, I just checked ghostscript fonts shipped with my distro and they
don't have any of the crappy Greek glyphs TeX Gyre have (neither do the
files linked from TeX Gyre
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 07:37:04PM +0200, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 01:06:47PM +0200, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
I don't go to TeX conferences, so mailing lists is the only place I can
discuss such stuff, and TeX Gyre fonts don't have a mailing list,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 07:51:48PM +0200, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
And their contact info is listed in... ?
The TeX Gyre page starts with a list of names. And the first paper in
the Readings section lists e-mail addresses. Have you tried
contacting them?
Apparently not, again for some
Apparently not, again for some reason I'd always the feeling that they
are not interested in feedback
I wonder how you got that feeling if you never made contact with
them...
(I also usually try to provide fixes with
my bug reports, but I can't really do
Hi,
I wanted to wikify the command »\nocap« and tried it out. But it does
seen to have any effect, see the example from the manual:
\starttext
\cap {People that have gathered their \cap {capital} at the cost of
other people are not seldom \nocap {decapitated} in revolutionary
times.}
\stoptext
Am 12.04.10 15:47, schrieb Marco:
Hi,
I wanted to wikify the command »\nocap« and tried it out. But it does
seen to have any effect, see the example from the manual:
\starttext
\cap {People that have gathered their \cap {capital} at the cost of
other people are not seldom \nocap {decapitated}
On 12-4-2010 7:26, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 12.04.10 15:47, schrieb Marco:
\unexpanded\def\notsmallcapped{\groupedcommand{\setcharactercasing[\plustwo]\char\zerocount}{}}
added
-
With MkIV \cap and \nocap is no longer necessary when you have a
opentype font
with the smcp (smallcapitals) and c2sc (capitals to smallcapitals)
features.
Thanks for your explanation. But why doesn't your example work with the
latin modern fonts? Don't they have these features? I'd be
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:23:02PM +0200, Marco wrote:
With MkIV \cap and \nocap is no longer necessary when you have a
opentype font
with the smcp (smallcapitals) and c2sc (capitals to smallcapitals)
features.
Thanks for your explanation. But why doesn't your example work with the
On 12-4-2010 9:43, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:23:02PM +0200, Marco wrote:
With MkIV \cap and \nocap is no longer necessary when you have a
opentype font
with the smcp (smallcapitals) and c2sc (capitals to smallcapitals)
features.
Thanks for your explanation. But why doesn't
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:41:59PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 12-4-2010 9:43, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:23:02PM +0200, Marco wrote:
With MkIV \cap and \nocap is no longer necessary when you have a
opentype font
with the smcp (smallcapitals) and c2sc (capitals to
They don't have a small caps OpenType feature (smcp) for a reason
beyond to me, they however have an old-fashioned separate small
caps font.
this is because they are cm compatible (the initial objective of the
project was a merge of all those variants)
Thanks for the explanation.
I
31 matches
Mail list logo
