Am 19.10.2009 um 17:53 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 19.10.2009 um 16:13 schrieb Andreas Harder:
There is an inherent "problem" as one can see in the attachment,
but since mostly I cite a whole paragraph it's not a real problem.
This happens when you start in the middle of a paragraph/lin
Am 19.10.2009 um 16:13 schrieb Andreas Harder:
There is an inherent "problem" as one can see in the attachment, but
since mostly I cite a whole paragraph it's not a real problem.
This happens when you start in the middle of a paragraph/line which
results in different line breaking.
I th
Am 19.10.2009 um 00:50 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:Am 18.10.2009 um 12:02 schrieb Andreas Harder:Before I help you provide us with more information, e.g. should the text in the bufferappear also in the complete text or do you it only in the snippet?Sorry, that I did not make myself clear. The real se
Am 18.10.2009 um 12:02 schrieb Andreas Harder:
Before I help you provide us with more information, e.g. should the
text in the buffer
appear also in the complete text or do you it only in the snippet?
Sorry, that I did not make myself clear. The real setup is: I've a
lot of line numbered
Am 18.10.2009 um 11:14 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 17.10.2009 um 22:29 schrieb Andreas Harder:
Hi all,
now that \inline[ref] etc. work—whereas in the case of \someline
[ref] \inline[ref] always jumps to the else-branch of its
definition and outputs the same line twice—I tried, obviousl
Am 17.10.2009 um 22:29 schrieb Andreas Harder:
Hi all,
now that \inline[ref] etc. work—whereas in the case of \someline
[ref] \inline[ref] always jumps to the else-branch of its definition
and outputs the same line twice—I tried, obviously naive, to realize
the following functionality (at
Hi all,
now that \inline[ref] etc. work—whereas in the case of \someline[ref]
\inline[ref] always jumps to the else-branch of its definition and
outputs the same line twice—I tried, obviously naive, to realize the
following functionality (attachment).
test-linenumbering4.tex
Description: