Re: [NTG-context] \startchemical

2015-08-21 Thread Hans Hagen
On 8/18/2015 8:01 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 19:42:20 +0200 Wolfgang Schuster wrote: why does \startchemical take the name of a instance as argument (e.g. \startchemical[important]) when there is no way to create it because \definechemical is redefined and the original version

Re: [NTG-context] \startchemical

2015-08-19 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Alan BRASLAU 18. August 2015 20:01 On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 19:42:20 +0200 I did not realize that \startchemical took the name of an instance as argument - I have only used it with key=value, i.e.: \startchemical[...=...] I suppose that it uses some "standard" mechanisms.

Re: [NTG-context] \startchemical

2015-08-18 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 19:42:20 +0200 Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > why does \startchemical take the name of a instance as argument (e.g. > \startchemical[important]) when > there is no way to create it because \definechemical is redefined and > the original version isn’t saved. > > Even \setupchemi

[NTG-context] \startchemical

2015-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Hi, why does \startchemical take the name of a instance as argument (e.g. \startchemical[important]) when there is no way to create it because \definechemical is redefined and the original version isn’t saved. Even \setupchemical[important][..,..=..,..] can’t be used because it doesn’t resol