On 8/18/2015 8:01 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 19:42:20 +0200
Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:
why does \startchemical take the name of a instance as argument (e.g.
\startchemical[important]) when
there is no way to create it because \definechemical is
Alan BRASLAU mailto:alan.bras...@cea.fr
18. August 2015 20:01
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 19:42:20 +0200
I did not realize that \startchemical took the name of an instance as
argument - I have only used it with key=value, i.e.:
\startchemical[...=...]
I suppose that it uses some standard mechanisms.
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 19:42:20 +0200
Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:
why does \startchemical take the name of a instance as argument (e.g.
\startchemical[important]) when
there is no way to create it because \definechemical is redefined and
the original version isn’t
Hi,
why does \startchemical take the name of a instance as argument (e.g.
\startchemical[important]) when
there is no way to create it because \definechemical is redefined and
the original version isn’t saved.
Even \setupchemical[important][..,..=..,..] can’t be used because it
doesn’t
