[My former message was not delivered and awaits moderator approval
because it is bigger than 64 KB. I removed the PDF output using XITS.]
Am Sonntag, den 12.06.2011, 23:52 +0200 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 15:06, Paul Menzel wrote:
ConTeXt ver: 2011.05.18 22:26 MKIV fmt:
apart from this IMHO very useful change (mapping to \int), maybe we should
create a unicode-math module which replaces some commands with symbols. i
find myself always using this for chemical and mathematical documents:
\catcode`→=\active
\def→{\xrightarrow}
\catcode`↔=\active
Am Sonntag, den 11.12.2011, 13:28 +0100 schrieb Philipp A.:
apart from this IMHO very useful change (mapping to \int), maybe we should
create a unicode-math module which replaces some commands with symbols.
Do you mean symbols by commands?
i find myself always using this for chemical and
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011, Philipp A. wrote:
apart from this IMHO very useful change (mapping to \int), maybe we should
create a unicode-math module which replaces some commands with symbols. i
find myself always using this for chemical and mathematical documents:
\catcode`→=\active
wow, there is really much magic going on in context. one reason why i love
it.
i once wrote a script that showed some nice little gui for a similar file
(i.e. xkb/symbols/??) that displayed the characters on a grid similar to
the keyboard layout and allowed displaying of the different layers. i
