John R. Culleton wrote:
> My preferences in order are printed book, downloadable source,
> downloadable pdf and online anything. Information needs to be
> structured, indexed, portable, easily readable.
Speaking of printed manuals, it struck me the other day that an interim
solu
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> Does this mean that in future (distant future) it will be possible to
> simple pass cont-en.fmt file along with the source file and write
>
> %&cont-en
>
> in the tex file, and someone just having plain tex can run
>
> tex filename (possibly multiple times) to get the
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> I don't agree that lack of a current manual is a big problem for
>> potential users of ConteXt. In my experience, the biggest problem is
>> with the 3rd party tools (perl, ghostscript, ruby) on Win32 and legacy
>> commercial u
John R. Culleton wrote:
> What is needed now for greater acceptance of Context is not new
> features but a new manual, perhaps a multi volume set with a
> common index. The 2001 manual is great, but many of the features
> discussed daily here are not in it. One must chase around the
> wiki and the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I don't agree that lack of a current manual is a big problem for
> potential users of ConteXt. In my experience, the biggest problem is
> with the 3rd party tools (perl, ghostscript, ruby) on Win32 and legacy
> commercial unix (where ruby is not provided and the system
On Friday 29 September 2006 10:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 9/28/06, John R. Culleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What is needed now for greater acceptance of Context is not new
> > features but a new manual, perhaps a multi volume set with a
> > common index. The 2001 manual is great, but
On 9/28/06, John R. Culleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is needed now for greater acceptance of Context is not new
> features but a new manual, perhaps a multi volume set with a
> common index. The 2001 manual is great, but many of the features
> discussed daily here are not in it. One must
On 9/28/06, John R. Culleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> What is needed now for greater acceptance of Context is not new
> features but a new manual, perhaps a multi volume set with a> common index.> If a consolidated manual set were offered for sale there would be a> lot of customers.>I'd buy it i
And me too. No doubt!
Ricard Roca
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
On Don 28.09.2006 09:42, Marcus Vinicius Mesquita de So wrote:
>I would buy it too...
I too ;-))
Ragards
Alex
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
I would buy it too...Marcus Vinicius
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messengers low PC-to-Phone call rates.___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
On 9/28/06, John R. Culleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is needed now for greater acceptance of Context is not new
> features but a new manual, perhaps a multi volume set with a
> common index.
> If a consolidated manual set were offered for sale there would be a
> lot of customers.
I'd b
What is needed now for greater acceptance of Context is not new
features but a new manual, perhaps a multi volume set with a
common index. The 2001 manual is great, but many of the features
discussed daily here are not in it. One must chase around the
wiki and the individual manuals like "details",
13 matches
Mail list logo
