RE: [NTG-context] Additional steps taken since the first e-mail

2005-02-28 Thread Mats Broberg
Hans, OK, and what should I do to remedy this? I am using ConTeXt out of the box, as it is when you install MikTeX. Should I download something else from your site? A more recent distribution? My log says: ConTeXt ver: 2005.01.24 Best regards, Mats Broberg On Behalf Of h h extern

Re: [NTG-context] Additional steps taken since the first e-mail

2005-02-28 Thread h h extern
Mats Broberg wrote: Hans, OK, and what should I do to remedy this? I am using ConTeXt out of the box, as it is when you install MikTeX. Should I download something else from your site? A more recent distribution? if things run fine, you can just ignore the message; normally more methods are

Re: [NTG-context] Additional steps taken since the first e-mail

2005-02-27 Thread VnPenguin
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:34:00 +0100, Johannes Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: newinstaller, i struggled more than one day with installation of context. i'm using a different OS (redhat linux) and have a different tex-distribution on it (tetex), but maybe this hint is useful for you too: in the

Re: [NTG-context] Additional steps taken since the first e-mail

2005-02-27 Thread h h extern
Mats Broberg wrote: However, when I run the test file, I still get the unknown file type: texmfscripts as the first entry, but the test file seem to be processed anyway. Does this mean I can forget about this warning? seesm like your tex binaries and context scripts are not in sync; Also, what

Re: [NTG-context] Additional steps taken since the first e-mail

2005-02-27 Thread h h extern
Johannes Werner wrote: newinstaller, i struggled more than one day with installation of context. i'm using a different OS (redhat linux) and have a different tex-distribution on it (tetex), but maybe this hint is useful for you too: in the tetex-distro there is a file .../texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf

[NTG-context] Additional steps taken since the first e-mail

2005-02-26 Thread Mats Broberg
Listmembers, I have also done the following since the first e-mail: - Copied the contents of texexec.rme to texexec.ini - Uncommented the set TeXShell to miktex line in the new texexec.ini file. - Added the string C:\texmf\miktex\context\perltk to the PATH (however, there is no context or

Re: [NTG-context] Additional steps taken since the first e-mail

2005-02-26 Thread Matthew Huggett
Mats Broberg wrote: I have also done the following since the first e-mail: - Copied the contents of texexec.rme to texexec.ini OK - Uncommented the set TeXShell to miktex line in the new texexec.ini file. - Added the string C:\texmf\miktex\context\perltk to the PATH

Re: [NTG-context] Additional steps taken since the first e-mail

2005-02-26 Thread Matthew Huggett
Also, what does mktexlsr refer to I don't know how it really works, so I can only explain this in layman's terms. If you look in your texmf directory, you should see a ls-R file. If you have a texmf-local tree, there should be one there too. These ls-R files make up a database that are

Re: [NTG-context] Additional steps taken since the first e-mail

2005-02-26 Thread Johannes Werner
newinstaller, i struggled more than one day with installation of context. i'm using a different OS (redhat linux) and have a different tex-distribution on it (tetex), but maybe this hint is useful for you too: in the tetex-distro there is a file .../texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf . in this file the