At 23:06 08/12/2003, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
Monday, December 8, 2003 Bob Kerstetter wrote:
I know XML source should work, but at least for me, creating XML source
is unproductive. I work with a text editor and find writing this:
``Hello world,'' says HAL.
much more productive than writing
On Dec 8, 2003, at 2:33 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am Montag, 08.12.03, um 18:20 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Bob
Kerstetter:
ConTeXt is very attractive because of its detailed control, layers,
colors, few or no packages(!), magical developers, and on and on.
It can obvious
Wednesday, December 10, 2003 Christopher G D Tipper wrote:
This is probably taboo, but surely the smart thing to do
is start from Word, generate some XML with macros, and
produce some HTML with stylesheets, some PDF with ConTeXt.
BTW you can generate some simple Context with VB macros and
On Dec 9, 2003, at 5:39 PM, Christopher G D Tipper wrote:
On Dec 8, 2003, at 2:33 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am Montag, 08.12.03, um 18:20 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Bob
Kerstetter:
ConTeXt is very attractive because of its detailed control, layers,
colors, few or no packages(!),
On Dec 8, 2003, at 12:55 PM, Peter Münster wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Bob Kerstetter wrote:
It can obvious produce PDF. Can it also produce HTML and Word from the
same document?
Hello,
I like TeX4ht for LaTeX. It would be great, if TeX4ht and ConTeXt work
together. It seems, that it works well
On Dec 8, 2003, at 2:33 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am Montag, 08.12.03, um 18:20 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Bob
Kerstetter:
ConTeXt is very attractive because of its detailed control, layers,
colors, few or no packages(!), magical developers, and on and on.
It can obvious produce PDF.
Monday, December 8, 2003 Bob Kerstetter wrote:
I know XML source should work, but at least for me, creating XML source
is unproductive. I work with a text editor and find writing this:
``Hello world,'' says HAL.
much more productive than writing this:
p#8220;Hello world#8221;/p, says
