Taco Hoekwater wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I strongly agree that ConTeXt needs an improved versioning model.
I agree. We probably all agree, Hans included. But we also need
improved days with more (or longer) hours. That, and pdftex and
xetex should stop evolving.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I strongly agree that ConTeXt needs an improved versioning model.
I agree. We probably all agree, Hans included. But we also need
improved days with more (or longer) hours. That, and pdftex and
xetex should stop evolving. Nothing is as disruptive as new
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Dear Patrtic,
... ConTeXt would probably stabilize, which IMHO is not a good thing.
One thing I really love ConTeXt for is the speed new techniques are
adopted (pdf features, luatex,...) One day we might have a ConTeXt
MKII book for those who are afraid of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Dear Patrtic,
... ConTeXt would probably stabilize, which IMHO is not a good thing.
One thing I really love ConTeXt for is the speed new techniques are
adopted (pdf features, luatex,...) One day we might have a ConTeXt
Dear Patrtic,
... ConTeXt would probably stabilize, which IMHO is not a good thing.
One thing I really love ConTeXt for is the speed new techniques are
adopted (pdf features, luatex,...) One day we might have a ConTeXt
MKII book for those who are afraid of swithing to pdftex2.
ConTeXt should
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky schrieb:
[...]
My experience of using open-source products (I'm best familiar with
Moodle) suggest that there should be overlapping cycles in
development: 1. Allocate new version number and start implementing
new features. Many things are broken at the moment and the
Ulf Martin wrote:
I wonder how people (esp. at Pragma) currently deal with this. What
happens if you have a ConTeXt doc from say 1997 that compiles into the
resp. PDF with some ConTeXt version from that time but not today
anymore? Which ConTeXt versions does one have to keep in order to be
On 4/14/07, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ulf Martin wrote:
I wonder how people (esp. at Pragma) currently deal with this.
for projects where we use relatively new features (which evolve) we use
frozen trees;
Confirm
One tree of 2002 (still-crazy-after-all-these-years).
Another of 2004.
