Am Thu, 2 Feb 2012 10:21:03 +0900 schrieb Vladimir Lomov:
1. if PDF output is only interesting then it is Ok, ignore that message,
because font information is already in PDF and PDF programs should deal
with it;
It doesn't depend on the output format. The checksum of vf and
tfm-files are
On 2-2-2012 02:21, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but this how I understand TFM font and currect
state of tex engines (actually pdftex, xetex and luatex):
sort of wrong
1. to use any font in tex one need a TFM file (file name = fontname.TFM),
that file actually contain
Am Wed, 1 Feb 2012 17:23:09 +0200 schrieb Khaled Hosny:
I tried printing the tfm table we pass to the backed, and the checksum
matches the one in the VF file, so this is a bit confusing
Well I actually don't know what test is actually done (and why
exactly) but some remarks:
1. If I try to
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:54 AM, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Vladimir Lomov lomov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
** luigi scarso [2012-02-01 08:45:18 +0100]:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Vladimir Lomov lomov...@gmail.com wrote:
I specially
Basically it seems coherent with the luatex manual (ch. 7 Font structure):
luatex read the txr.tfm file and set the checksum to the unsigned int 0
(luafont.w ,int font_from_lua(lua_State * L, int f)) (but see Note below)
Then read the vf
(dofont.w, do_vf(f) inside static int do_define_font(int
Hello,
** luigi scarso [2012-02-01 08:45:18 +0100]:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Vladimir Lomov lomov...@gmail.com wrote:
I specially chose that font (txr, txr.tfm and txr.vf files), it is
distributed by txfonts package. May be you installation doesn't have
them because I installed
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Vladimir Lomov lomov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
** luigi scarso [2012-02-01 08:45:18 +0100]:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Vladimir Lomov lomov...@gmail.com wrote:
I specially chose that font (txr, txr.tfm and txr.vf files), it is
distributed by txfonts
Hello,
** luigi scarso [2012-02-01 10:54:04 +0100]:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Vladimir Lomov lomov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
** luigi scarso [2012-02-01 08:45:18 +0100]:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Vladimir Lomov lomov...@gmail.com wrote:
I specially chose that font (txr,
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Vladimir Lomov lomov...@gmail.com wrote:
We have
$vftovp txr.vf
(VTITLE )
(FAMILY TXR)
(FACE F MRR)
(CODINGSCHEME TEX TEXT)
(DESIGNSIZE R 10.0)
(COMMENT DESIGNSIZE IS IN POINTS)
(COMMENT OTHER SIZES ARE MULTIPLES OF DESIGNSIZE)
(CHECKSUM O 32212676346)
Am Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:54:04 +0100 schrieb luigi scarso:
It's not related to MKIV but to luatex.
I think it is related to MKIV (or more precisely to the fontloader).
It is a bit difficult to demonstrate it with context (how to you use
luatex without mkiv there?) but latex (or plain) it is quite
On 1-2-2012 15:15, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
Am Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:54:04 +0100 schrieb luigi scarso:
It's not related to MKIV but to luatex.
I think it is related to MKIV (or more precisely to the fontloader).
It is a bit difficult to demonstrate it with context (how to you use
luatex without
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Ulrike Fischer ne...@nililand.de wrote:
Am Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:54:04 +0100 schrieb luigi scarso:
It's not related to MKIV but to luatex.
I think it is related to MKIV (or more precisely to the fontloader).
The message can be reproduced also with luatex
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:15:14PM +0100, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
So the code from luaotfload (which is based on the context
fontloader code) changes a checksum (either in the vf or in the
tfm-information) and so the check in the luatex engines fails.
I tried printing the tfm table we pass to
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:47:32PM +0100, luigi scarso wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Ulrike Fischer ne...@nililand.de wrote:
Am Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:54:04 +0100 schrieb luigi scarso:
It's not related to MKIV but to luatex.
I think it is related to MKIV (or more precisely to the
Hello,
** Hans Hagen [2012-02-01 15:22:58 +0100]:
On 1-2-2012 15:15, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
Am Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:54:04 +0100 schrieb luigi scarso:
It's not related to MKIV but to luatex.
I think it is related to MKIV (or more precisely to the fontloader).
It is a bit difficult to demonstrate
Hello,
** luigi scarso [2012-02-01 15:04:07 +0100]:
[...]
I was not sure, that why I began this thread. I started with latex example,
then strip it down to plain tex one and after that came to context
minimal example.
it's also in pdftex: see
function vf_def_font
in
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Vladimir Lomov lomov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
** luigi scarso [2012-02-01 15:04:07 +0100]:
[...]
I was not sure, that why I began this thread. I started with latex example,
then strip it down to plain tex one and after that came to context
minimal example.
Hello,
please consider the following example:
example file=ex8.tex
\starttext
\font\test=txr \test abs
\stoptext
/example
I process this document with context (context --version - 2012.01.25)
nothing suspecious in terminal output but in log file I see checksum mismatch,
terminal
$ grep
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Vladimir Lomov lomov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
please consider the following example:
example file=ex8.tex
\starttext
\font\test=txr \test abs
\stoptext
/example
I process this document with context (context --version - 2012.01.25)
nothing suspecious
Hello,
** luigi scarso [2012-02-01 02:37:20 +0100]:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Vladimir Lomov lomov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
please consider the following example:
example file=ex8.tex
\starttext
\font\test=txr \test abs
\stoptext
/example
I process this document with context
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Vladimir Lomov lomov...@gmail.com wrote:
I specially chose that font (txr, txr.tfm and txr.vf files), it is
distributed by txfonts package. May be you installation doesn't have
them because I installed context suite with './first-setup.sh --modules=all'.
21 matches
Mail list logo
