Re: [NTG-context] Footnotes in MkIV and MkII
On 29-10-2010 12:52, Matija Šuklje wrote:
Dne petek 29. oktobra 2010 ob 00:42:20 je Hans Hagen napisal(a):
On 29-10-2010 12:17, Matija Šuklje wrote:
Hullo,
from what I can understand I'm using \footnote correctly (i.e. as on
wiki), but if I generate the document with 'context' every footnote
instance is just a direct copy of the first footnote.
If I generate it with 'texexec' though, the footnotes are generated as
expected.
Is that a MkIV bug, feature or just me being stupid?
sounds like a but or maybe a side effect of how you use the footnote; in
mkiv footnotes are stored differently (and can actually be accessed in
many ways) .. so a small test file is needed that shows the problem
\starttext
Something something\footnote{dark side}
Something something\footnote{complete}
\stoptext
Something as simple as that already triggers it in my case.
I'm using minimals from 2010.06.18 11:26.
first update then
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Footnotes in MkIV and MkII
Dne petek 29. oktobra 2010 ob 11:24:36 je Hans Hagen napisal(a): first update then Will do, thanks :) Cheers, Matija -- gsm:+386 41 849 552 www:http://matija.suklje.name xmpp: matija.suk...@gabbler.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] Footnotes in MkIV and MkII
Hullo, from what I can understand I'm using \footnote correctly (i.e. as on wiki), but if I generate the document with 'context' every footnote instance is just a direct copy of the first footnote. If I generate it with 'texexec' though, the footnotes are generated as expected. Is that a MkIV bug, feature or just me being stupid? Cheers, Matija -- gsm:+386 41 849 552 www:http://matija.suklje.name xmpp: matija.suk...@gabbler.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Footnotes in MkIV and MkII
On 29-10-2010 12:17, Matija Šuklje wrote: Hullo, from what I can understand I'm using \footnote correctly (i.e. as on wiki), but if I generate the document with 'context' every footnote instance is just a direct copy of the first footnote. If I generate it with 'texexec' though, the footnotes are generated as expected. Is that a MkIV bug, feature or just me being stupid? sounds like a but or maybe a side effect of how you use the footnote; in mkiv footnotes are stored differently (and can actually be accessed in many ways) .. so a small test file is needed that shows the problem - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Footnotes in MkIV and MkII
Dne petek 29. oktobra 2010 ob 00:42:20 je Hans Hagen napisal(a):
On 29-10-2010 12:17, Matija Šuklje wrote:
Hullo,
from what I can understand I'm using \footnote correctly (i.e. as on
wiki), but if I generate the document with 'context' every footnote
instance is just a direct copy of the first footnote.
If I generate it with 'texexec' though, the footnotes are generated as
expected.
Is that a MkIV bug, feature or just me being stupid?
sounds like a but or maybe a side effect of how you use the footnote; in
mkiv footnotes are stored differently (and can actually be accessed in
many ways) .. so a small test file is needed that shows the problem
\starttext
Something something\footnote{dark side}
Something something\footnote{complete}
\stoptext
Something as simple as that already triggers it in my case.
I'm using minimals from 2010.06.18 11:26.
Cheers,
Matija
--
gsm:+386 41 849 552
www:http://matija.suklje.name
xmpp: matija.suk...@gabbler.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
