### Re: [NTG-context] How to \bf for math?

Hans Hagen wrote: (concerning the definemathcharacters, we need input from taco on that because he knows what goes on deep inside tex and has done complex math typesetting for ages) The \definemathcharacter macro is a actually quite simple, it is mostly a syntactic wrapper around \mathcode

### Re: [NTG-context] How to \bf for math?

Adam Lindsay wrote: Now, do digits ever get bold-ed in mixed bold and regular math? AFAIK, only in courseware (and perhaps other explanatory texts, like errata). There, the required emphasis can be anything, really, but nobody would object to a \hbox{} wrapper either. Cheers, Taco

### Re: [NTG-context] How to \bf for math?

Very interesting, but with these definitions, I can't get roman characters in formulae. For the moment, the best solution for me is still the hbox wrapper. David Adam Lindsay wrote: \startmathcollection[default] %eventual patch for math-tex? \definemathcharacter [a] [nothing] [mi] [61]

### Re: [NTG-context] How to \bf for math?

David Munger wrote: Very interesting, but with these definitions, I can't get roman characters in formulae. For the moment, the best solution for me is still the hbox wrapper. Okay. What do you mean by can't get roman characters? Can you give an minimal example? adam Adam Lindsay wrote:

### Re: [NTG-context] How to \bf for math?

Adam Lindsay wrote : David Munger wrote: Very interesting, but with these definitions, I can't get roman characters in formulae. For the moment, the best solution for me is still the hbox wrapper. Okay. What do you mean by can't get roman characters? Can you give an minimal example?

### Re: [NTG-context] How to \bf for math?

David Munger wrote: Adam Lindsay wrote : David Munger wrote: Very interesting, but with these definitions, I can't get roman characters in formulae. For the moment, the best solution for me is still the hbox wrapper. Okay. What do you mean by can't get roman characters? Can you give an

### Re: [NTG-context] How to \bf for math?

Adam Lindsay wrote : David Munger wrote: Adam Lindsay wrote : David Munger wrote: Very interesting, but with these definitions, I can't get roman characters in formulae. For the moment, the best solution for me is still the hbox wrapper. Okay. What do you mean by can't get roman

### Re: [NTG-context] How to \bf for math?

Adam Lindsay wrote: David Munger wrote: Adam Lindsay wrote : David Munger wrote: Very interesting, but with these definitions, I can't get roman characters in formulae. For the moment, the best solution for me is still the hbox wrapper. Okay. What do you mean by

### Re: [NTG-context] How to \bf for math?

Adam Lindsay wrote: \startmathcollection[default] %eventual patch for math-tex? \definemathcharacter [a] [nothing] [mi] [61] \definemathcharacter [b] [nothing] [mi] [62] \definemathcharacter [c] [nothing] [mi] [63] \definemathcharacter [d] [nothing] [mi] [64] \definemathcharacter

### Re: [NTG-context] How to \bf for math?

Hans Hagen wrote: taco is the math expert ... At the moment, I don't understand this math vs. typescript stuff any better than the next person, I'm afraid. There are a number of (perhaps conflicting?) ways of getting 'bold math' in your text, and I have not the faintest clue which one is

### Re: [NTG-context] How to \bf for math?

Taco, thanks for the answer. I managed to change the whole math family into bold, but I can't get the following example working: \switchtobodyfont[iwona-light,ss] $$normal {\bf bold}{\bfm bold}{\bfmath bold}$$ \bf and \bfmath result in cm fonts, \bfm has no influence, no matter what I tried to

### Re: [NTG-context] How to \bf for math?

Hans Hagen wrote: Mojca Miklavec wrote: I'm also able to get the complete formula typeset in bold iwona, but I don't know how to get something like $-{\bf\nabla}\phi={\bi E}$, where \phi would be typeset in iwona-light and the rest in iwona-heavy for example. maybe a way out is something

### Re: [NTG-context] How to \bf for math?

Hi Mojca, I must say I understand about nothing about fonts in ConTeXt. But I've somehow managed do define a bold vector command, working in my environment. I hope it helps. \definetypeface [boldmath] [mm] [boldmath] [latin-modern] [default] % boldsymbol work-around

### Re: [NTG-context] How to \bf for math?

Mojca Miklavec wrote: . I grep-ed for bfmath and boldmath and tried to replace them, but no success at all. See the attached file for my attempts. Yeah, that's what got me confused as well. I'll try to sort all this bold/not bold/fake bold/wrong bold math out (unless someone else

### [NTG-context] How to \bf for math?

Hello, What exactly is the ConTeXt alternative to LaTeX's \mathbf (switch to bold or bold italic math fonts)? (Btw: is it better to use bold or bold italic for typesetting vectors? We use overrightharpoonup, so I don't know what an international standard says.) I understand the main commands

### Re: [NTG-context] How to \bf for math?

What exactly is the ConTeXt alternative to LaTeX's \mathbf (switch to bold or bold italic math fonts)? I can't help you here, but did you read http://wiki.contextgarden.net/ Bold_Math ? Grüßlis vom Hraban! --- http://www.fiee.net/texnique/ http://contextgarden.net http://www.cacert.org (I'm

### Re: [NTG-context] How to \bf for math?

Mojca Miklavec wrote: Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: What exactly is the ConTeXt alternative to LaTeX's \mathbf (switch to bold or bold italic math fonts)? I can't help you here, but did you read http://wiki.contextgarden.net/ Bold_Math ? I tried a couple of tricks, but none of