Re: [NTG-context] How to typeset ellipsis (=three dots)?
Am 20.08.2011 um 20:57 schrieb Marcin Borkowski: Do I get it correctly that \unknown yields three characters (dots) in the resulting pdf and … one (if it's available in the font, at least)? Yes, \unknown are three periods which are separated by a small space and … is one character. Sometimes \unknown can give a better look and it can be necessary when you use a Type1 font which lacks … Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] How to typeset ellipsis (=three dots)?
Dnia 2011-08-07, o godz. 08:07:24 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com napisał(a): Am 06.08.2011 um 23:39 schrieb Marcin Borkowski: Hi, I looked into the \dots macro: I can see how it works in math mode, but in text mode it puts a thin space (\,) after the dots. So what is the right way to type, say, this sentence: I like ConTeXt... but the learning curve is steep! A. I like \CONTEXT\dots but the learning curve is steep! or B. I like \CONTEXT\dots\ but the learning curve is steep! ? “\CONTEXT\unknown” or “\CONTEXT …” Wolfgang Thanks! Do I get it correctly that \unknown yields three characters (dots) in the resulting pdf and … one (if it's available in the font, at least)? Regards, -- Marcin Borkowski ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] How to typeset ellipsis (=three dots)?
Dnia 2011-08-07, o godz. 11:35:39
Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.de napisał(a):
Am 06.08.2011 um 23:39 schrieb Marcin Borkowski:
Hi,
I looked into the \dots macro: I can see how it works in math mode,
but in text mode it puts a thin space (\,) after the dots. So what
is the right way to type, say, this sentence:
I like ConTeXt... but the learning curve is steep!
A. I like \CONTEXT\dots but the learning curve is steep!
or
B. I like \CONTEXT\dots\ but the learning curve is steep!
What about this?
I like \CONTEXT{\dots} but the learning curve is steep!
This I consider equivalent to \dots\ (at least in this, well,
context;)).
Steffen
--
Marcin Borkowski
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
