Re: [NTG-context] Integral limits

2013-11-18 Thread Hans Hagen

On 11/18/2013 11:45 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

2. Define a new mathclass "intop" and use that in char-def.lua. Then, in
the appropriate math-*.lua file, map intop to the appropriate macro.

What would be the best way to go?


i prefer 2 (as these set the defaults) and we can make a definer for
specific variants if needed (at all)


Great.


is intop the best name? (we don't need to be sparse)


How about: integral or integral_operator?


we have radical, limop, nolimop so maybe intop and nointop are ok (we 
can have verbose synonyms but then we also need them for lim)


just wrap up what is needed and i'll look into it (or you can provide 
patches)


Hans


-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Integral limits

2013-11-18 Thread Aditya Mahajan

2. Define a new mathclass "intop" and use that in char-def.lua. Then, in
the appropriate math-*.lua file, map intop to the appropriate macro.

What would be the best way to go?


i prefer 2 (as these set the defaults) and we can make a definer for specific 
variants if needed (at all)


Great.


is intop the best name? (we don't need to be sparse)


How about: integral or integral_operator?

Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Integral limits

2013-11-18 Thread Hans Hagen

On 11/18/2013 9:41 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

Hi,

In MkII, it was possible to change the limits on integrals using

\setupmathematics[integral=...] % limits, nolimits, displaylimits

that would affect how \int, \iint, \iiint, \oint, etc behaved.

I can see two ways of definining a similar feature in MkIV.

1. Define \intop, \iintop, etc in char-def.lua and then somewhere define:

\define\int{\intop\intlimits}
\define\iint{\intop\intlimits}

   etc.

2. Define a new mathclass "intop" and use that in char-def.lua. Then, in
the appropriate math-*.lua file, map intop to the appropriate macro.

What would be the best way to go?


i prefer 2 (as these set the defaults) and we can make a definer for 
specific variants if needed (at all)


is intop the best name? (we don't need to be sparse)

Hans


-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


[NTG-context] Integral limits

2013-11-18 Thread Aditya Mahajan

Hi,

In MkII, it was possible to change the limits on integrals using

   \setupmathematics[integral=...] % limits, nolimits, displaylimits

that would affect how \int, \iint, \iiint, \oint, etc behaved.

I can see two ways of definining a similar feature in MkIV.

1. Define \intop, \iintop, etc in char-def.lua and then somewhere define:

   \define\int{\intop\intlimits}
   \define\iint{\intop\intlimits}

  etc.

2. Define a new mathclass "intop" and use that in char-def.lua. Then, in 
the appropriate math-*.lua file, map intop to the appropriate macro.


What would be the best way to go?

Thanks,
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Integral limits on wrong place

2011-11-23 Thread Hans Hagen

On 23-11-2011 17:21, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist  wrote:

Dear list,

in the latest minimals (downloaded today 15 nov 2011) I get the
integral limits placed below and above the integral sign, per default.

%%% Example
%\setupmathematics[integral=nolimits]
\starttext
$\int_a^b f(x)\, dx$
\startformula
\int_a^b f(x)\, dx.
\stopformula
\stoptext
%%% End of example

The result is http://tmp.oblandat.se/integraltest.pdf

I'd expect the limits to be placed more to the right. Even if the line
\setupmathematics[integral=nolimits] is uncommented (as suggested on
the wiki) nothing is improved.

Is this something that has changed recently? I can add a \nolimits at
every integral but that is not a nice option.

It would be nice to have the integrals back as they used to be.

With best regards (and thanks in advance), Mikael



Dear list,

also here no reply in a week, so I bump it.


it just ends op my (large) stack of to-be-looked into so reminding helps


Is it only me having this issue? Is there a fix?


patch this in in math-int.mkiv:

\appendtoks

\mathintlimitmode\executeifdefined{\??mo::\v!integral::\@@mointegral}\zerocount
\to \everysetupmathematics




-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Integral limits on wrong place

2011-11-23 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist  wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> in the latest minimals (downloaded today 15 nov 2011) I get the
> integral limits placed below and above the integral sign, per default.
>
> %%% Example
> %\setupmathematics[integral=nolimits]
> \starttext
> $\int_a^b f(x)\, dx$
> \startformula
> \int_a^b f(x)\, dx.
> \stopformula
> \stoptext
> %%% End of example
>
> The result is http://tmp.oblandat.se/integraltest.pdf
>
> I'd expect the limits to be placed more to the right. Even if the line
> \setupmathematics[integral=nolimits] is uncommented (as suggested on
> the wiki) nothing is improved.
>
> Is this something that has changed recently? I can add a \nolimits at
> every integral but that is not a nice option.
>
> It would be nice to have the integrals back as they used to be.
>
> With best regards (and thanks in advance), Mikael
>

Dear list,

also here no reply in a week, so I bump it.

Is it only me having this issue? Is there a fix?

Best regards, Mikael
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


[NTG-context] Integral limits on wrong place

2011-11-15 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
Dear list,

in the latest minimals (downloaded today 15 nov 2011) I get the
integral limits placed below and above the integral sign, per default.

%%% Example
%\setupmathematics[integral=nolimits]
\starttext
$\int_a^b f(x)\, dx$
\startformula
\int_a^b f(x)\, dx.
\stopformula
\stoptext
%%% End of example

The result is http://tmp.oblandat.se/integraltest.pdf

I'd expect the limits to be placed more to the right. Even if the line
\setupmathematics[integral=nolimits] is uncommented (as suggested on
the wiki) nothing is improved.

Is this something that has changed recently? I can add a \nolimits at
every integral but that is not a nice option.

It would be nice to have the integrals back as they used to be.

With best regards (and thanks in advance), Mikael
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___