Should I downgrade to an older Context version, or is
there a fix available ?
TIA
Wim
Hamid Kamrani wrote:
This happens on live context too. Itemize starts with 0 in some
situations. You can create the problem with:
This happens on live context too. Itemize starts with 0 in some
situations. You can create the problem with:
\starttext
\bTABLE
\bTR
\bTD
\startitemize[n]
\item one
\item two
\stopitemize
\eTD
\eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
On 7/1/07, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, [EMAIL
Hi,
When I use
\startitemize[n]
\item One
\item Two
\stopitemize
the list starts at 0 (zero) instead of 1 (one)
I am using the standalone Windows version
ConTeXt ver: 2007.06.26 23:21 MKII fmt: 2007.7.1 int: english/english
Kind regards
Wim
Hello Wim,
When I use
\startitemize[n]
\item One
\item Two
\stopitemize
the list starts at 0 (zero) instead of 1 (one)
\starttext
\startitemize[n]
\item One
\item Two
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Are you sure about this? I've just tried the above in
live.contextgarden.net and the result looks
Patrick et al,
I also tried it on live.contextgarden.net and there it works fine.
But not with my Context.
I have some definitions but they did not change for more than 6 months,
and comparing my setups with some of my backups, nothing has changed.
The only change is that I updated Context with
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick et al,
I also tried it on live.contextgarden.net and there it works fine.
But not with my Context.
I have some definitions but they did not change for more than 6 months,
and comparing my setups with some of my backups, nothing has
To Aditya
It is possible that this change caused your existing setup to break.
Can you create a minimum example that exhibits the problem? Start with
Patrick's example, and start adding lines from your setup, so that the
problem reappears. That may help in figuring out if it is something
wrong in
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To Aditya
It is possible that this change caused your existing setup to break.
Can you create a minimum example that exhibits the problem? Start with
Patrick's example, and start adding lines from your setup, so that the
problem reappears. That
